Dominant Non-Dominant Upper Extremity in Gender

NCT ID: NCT06269887

Last Updated: 2024-06-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

213 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-11-07

Study Completion Date

2024-03-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

There are strength and functional differences between non-dominant and dominant extremities. This is important in the hand and extremity rehabilitation process. This situation also differs between genders. Comparison of the dominant and non-dominant limb can provide important clinical or rehabilitation field-related information. It is reported in the literature that manual dexterity, grip strength and joint position sense may differ between extremities. However, the relationship between this situation and the difference between genders has not been explained. It is thought that examining this difference can be extremely useful in determining achievable goals in hand rehabilitation and in customizing care for different groups.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Many treatment protocols compare the strength of the injured extremity to the uninjured extremity or compare it to normative data from the same group of individuals. There is controversy about the difference in grip strength between dominant and non-dominant hands in left- and right-hand dominant individuals. There is no study in the literature that evaluates the differences in muscle strength, joint position sense and upper extremity function skills between dominant and non-dominant upper extremities between genders. It is very important to include bilateral activity training in rehabilitation programs that aim to improve upper extremity mobility and speed. In addition, it will contribute to the accurate evaluation of activity and participation limitations, the determination of priorities, the selection of the right activity in task-specific and target-oriented treatment approaches, and the achievement of more effective results when integrated with technology-supported approaches. Therefore, the aim of our study is to fill this gap in the literature by comparing the differences between dominant and non-dominant upper extremities between genders.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Upper Extremity Problem Gender Issues

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Male

Hand preference was evaluated with the Edinburgh Hand Preference Questionnaire, grip muscle strength with the Jamar dynamometer, dexterity with the Purdue Pegboard Test, and proprioception as joint position sense with the inclinometer.

No interventions assigned to this group

Female

Hand preference was evaluated with the Edinburgh Hand Preference Questionnaire, grip muscle strength with the Jamar dynamometer, dexterity with the Purdue Pegboard Test, and proprioception as joint position sense with the inclinometer.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Being between the ages of 18-25
2. Volunteering to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria

1. Having trauma (fracture, dislocation) in the last year
2. Doing sports or activities that require bilateral activity (playing music, knitting, sports, etc.)
3. Being diagnosed with any neurological or orthopedic disease that will affect hand-eye coordination
4. Having had upper extremity surgery
5. Having any Botox injection in the last 6 months
6. Those who did not agree to participate in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

25 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Karabuk University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

METEHAN YANA

Study director, PT, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Karabük University

Karabük, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bhat AK, Jindal R, Acharya AM. The influence of ethnic differences based on upper limb anthropometry on grip and pinch strength. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021 Jul 15;21:101504. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101504. eCollection 2021 Oct.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 34367910 (View on PubMed)

Amo-Setien FJ, Leal-Costa C, Abajas-Bustillo R, Gonzalez-Lamuno D, Redondo-Figuero C; EXERNET Research Group. Factors associated with grip strength among adolescents: An observational study. J Hand Ther. 2020 Jan-Mar;33(1):96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2018.10.005. Epub 2018 Nov 30.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30503041 (View on PubMed)

Dag F, Erdogan AT. Gender and age differences in absolute and relative handgrip strength of the Turkish population aged 8-27 years. Hand Surg Rehabil. 2020 Dec;39(6):556-563. doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2020.06.005. Epub 2020 Aug 18.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32818689 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Karabuk-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.