Near-Infrared Light Devices Versus Landmark Approach for Peripheral Venous Access in Intensive Care Unit
NCT ID: NCT06234293
Last Updated: 2026-01-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
380 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-02-28
2025-07-16
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Peripheral intravenous cannulation (PIVC) on a critically ill patient can be a significant challenge for nurses. After several days in ICU, patients may develop significant edema in the upper limbs, complicating the PIVC.
Near-infrared light devices (NILD) are medical devices that use near-infrared light to highlight the patient's peripheral venous network directly on their skin. The advantage of this device is its minimal training and ease of use for effective application. Nurses can use this medical device without specific conditions once they have received training on its use. The vein illuminator has not been extensively studied in ICU.
This study aims to compare two techniques for PIVC in critically ill patients with existing CVC for whom maintaining the deep venous access is no longer indicated.
The investigators hypothesize that the use of the NILD would increase the success rate of first-attempt PIVC insertion compared to a landmark approach (traditional method) for PIVC in ICU.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Infrared for Peripheral Venous Catheterization in the Critically-ill
NCT03932214
Complications Associated With Central Venous Access in the NSICU: PICC vs CVC
NCT02314520
Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Intravenous Access by Critical Nurses.
NCT02285712
Impact of a Task Delegation to ICU Nurses for Midlines' Placement
NCT04155723
Peripherally Inserted Versus Centrally Inserted Central Venous Catheters in the Neurological Intensive Care
NCT01495429
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Randomization will be done immediately after the enrollment of the patient. Randomization will be stratified by center and according to anticipated difficult venous access defined by:
* BMI \> 30 Kg/m2
* Increase in body weight between admission and day of inclusion \> 10%.
* Clinically evident edema of the upper limbs (with pitting)
* Absence of visible or palpable veins on arms and forearms If one or more items are present, the patient is classified as difficult to venous access.
Once the patient has been enrolled and randomized, the nurse in charge of the patient performs the PIVC according to the randomization group as soon as possible after randomization.
The nurse will have a maximum of 3 attempts before handing over to another nurse. The total number of attempts will be 5 with the allocated method (traditional method or NILD).
In the case of failure after 5 initial attempts, the intervention will be considered as a failure. However, a maximum of 5 additional attempts will be allowed with any method on the day of randomization. The success or failure of PIVC will be recorded, as well as the device used. The attempts should be performed within 6 hours after randomization.
If one of the 5 first initial attempts is successful, the study continues until the PIVC is removed (max 7 days according to recommendations) or patient discharge, whichever comes first, in order to evaluate the occurrence of local complications.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
near-infrared light device
the device used is the AccuVein AV500® (Accuvein, New York USA). Nurses will have to find the vein for the PIVC using the near-infrared light device. Nurses will have to proceed as follows: apply the tourniquet, put on the near infrared light onto the upper limb. PIVC on the lower limbs is forbidden in this study. The recommended projection distance is around 20 cm, however, the optimal distance of projection can vary between 10 and 45 cm. After finding the vein, Nurses proceed to PIVC with the device turned on, the peripheral venous network visible on the skin of the patient. After the cannulation and to confirm the functionality of the peripheral intravenous access a flash of 10cc of an isotonic solution (NaCl 0.9%) will be injected
near-infrared light device
Nurses will have to find the vein for the PIVC using the near-infrared light device.
landmark approach
PIVC will be done by a nurse on an upper limb according to the standard approach. The nurse will proceed as follows: apply the tourniquet and find a vein for the catheterization, standard techniques to highlight veins can be used (apply alcohol, tap veins …). After finding a vein, the nurses proceed to the PIVC according to his / her habits. The use of any device is forbidden. After the cannulation and to confirm the functionality of the peripheral venous access a flash of 10cc of an isotonic solution (NaCl 0.9%) will be injected.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
near-infrared light device
Nurses will have to find the vein for the PIVC using the near-infrared light device.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Hospitalized in ICU
* with a deep venous catheter (jugular, subclavian or femoral)
* In whom the use of a deep venous line is no longer justified (absence of: vasopressor amines, chemotherapy, parenteral nutrition, hypertonic solutions)
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient already included in the study
* Tattoo covering most of both forearms
* Adult subject to a legal protection measure (guardianship, curators, person under court protection)
* Persons deprived of their liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, persons hospitalised without consent and persons admitted to a health or social establishment for purposes other than research.
* Pregnant or breast-feeding woman
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Aude FERRIER
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
CHU Orléans
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CH de Chartres
Chartres, , France
CH Le Mans
Le Mans, , France
CHU Orléans
Orléans, , France
CHU de Tours
Tours, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gregg SC, Murthi SB, Sisley AC, Stein DM, Scalea TM. Ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access in the intensive care unit. J Crit Care. 2010 Sep;25(3):514-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.09.003. Epub 2009 Oct 15.
Carr PJ, Rippey JCR, Cooke ML, Trevenen ML, Higgins NS, Foale AS, Rickard CM. Factors associated with peripheral intravenous cannulation first-time insertion success in the emergency department. A multicentre prospective cohort analysis of patient, clinician and product characteristics. BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 2;9(4):e022278. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022278.
Bridey C, Thilly N, Lefevre T, Maire-Richard A, Morel M, Levy B, Girerd N, Kimmoun A. Ultrasound-guided versus landmark approach for peripheral intravenous access by critical care nurses: a randomised controlled study. BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 9;8(6):e020220. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020220.
Curtis SJ, Craig WR, Logue E, Vandermeer B, Hanson A, Klassen T. Ultrasound or near-infrared vascular imaging to guide peripheral intravenous catheterization in children: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. CMAJ. 2015 May 19;187(8):563-570. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.141012. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
Park JM, Kim MJ, Yim HW, Lee WC, Jeong H, Kim NJ. Utility of near-infrared light devices for pediatric peripheral intravenous cannulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pediatr. 2016 Dec;175(12):1975-1988. doi: 10.1007/s00431-016-2796-5. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
Ferrier A, Despres A, Brasselet A, Badre G, Wanneveich M, Nay MA. Near-infrared light devices versus landmark approach for peripheral venous access in the intensive care unit: protocol of a randomised controlled study. BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 18;15(8):e102390. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102390.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CHRO-2022-14
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.