Impact of Psychomotor Therapy on the Quality of Life in Depression
NCT ID: NCT06234176
Last Updated: 2025-02-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
128 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-04-01
2026-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The investigators will assess how the participants' quality of life and psychomotor profile change over time.
The study aims to compare the quality of life at 3 months between patients who received 3 months of personalised psychomotor therapy in addition to standard treatment and those who received standard treatment alone.
The study lasted for 6 months, and the investigators expects a total of 128 people to participate in this research across several hospital establishments. This study evaluates the effectiveness of two types of treatment, divided into two randomly selected groups.
To participate, individuals must have a medical diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD) and be between the ages of 20 and 60.
They must have depressive symptoms with an HDRS score greater than 16 and provide informed consent. They must be treated or hospitalised at the Centre Hospitalier Esquirol or the Centre Hospitalier Henri Laborit (France).
After providing consent, they will undergo an initial clinical interview that evaluates anxiety, self-esteem, pleasure, and quality of life. The therapist assessed the participant's muscle tone, gross motor skills, praxis, manual dexterity, rhythm, processing of sensory information, and body image.
Following the assessment, the participant was randomly assigned to either the experimental or control group.
The experimental group received the usual treatment for depression and underwent psychomotor therapy once a week for 12 weeks.
The control group received the standard treatment for depression and underwent weekly telephone interviews.
An assessment is scheduled at 1 month to evaluate the participant's health status, including any changes to treatment and assessment of anxiety and depressive symptoms.
Another interim check-up is scheduled at 3 months to assess the patient's health status. The interview will also assess any changes to treatment, anxiety and depressive symptoms, quality of life, and psychomotor function.
A final visit will be scheduled at 6 months for an assessment of the participant's health. The interview will also assess any changes to treatment, anxiety and depressive symptoms, quality of life, and psychomotor function.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Healthy Lifestyle Promotion as Adjunctive Teletherapy for Treatment-resistant Major Depression
NCT04428099
Physical Therapy for Depression Quality of Life (Pilot Study Protocol)
NCT06983405
Mood and Thought Process Study
NCT05585775
Efficacy of 18-Months of Antidepressive Medication Plus CBT or Dynamic or Supportive Psychotherapy for Recurrent Major Depression
NCT00220623
Group Metacognitive Therapy vs Clinical Management for Depression
NCT03711123
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In this study, the investigators propose to compare the quality of life of two groups of participants: a group receiving one psychomotor therapy session per week in addition to the usual treatments for depression, and a group receiving the usual treatments for depression. The investigators will evaluate changes in quality of life and psychomotor profile over time (at 3 and 6 months).
Based on the results of our pilot study, the psychomotor examination will include an assessment of muscle tone, gross motor skills, praxis, manual dexterity, rhythm using the NP-MOT battery, sensory processing and body image.
Main objective To compare the quality of life at 3 months (M3) between MDD patients receiving 3 months of personalised psychomotor therapy in addition to standard treatment (GP) and those receiving standard treatment alone (GC).
Secondary objectives
1. To compare changes in quality of life over time between D0/M3, D0/M6 and M3/M6 in patients in the GP and GC groups; a difference between the groups will be sought.
2. Identify the psychomotor assessment items (tone, general motor skills, praxis, rhythm, body image, sensory profile) that differ at inclusion (D0) and 3 months (M3) between the GP and GC groups.
3. To identify clinical factors of depression (intensity of depression, anxiety, psychomotor slowing, anhedonia) associated with a difference in psychomotor profile at M3 between the GP and GC groups.
4. Identify items predictive of clinical improvement in depression based on psychomotor assessment items (tone, general motor skills, praxis, rhythm, body image, sensory profile) at 6 months (M6) in patients in the GP and GC groups.
5. Evaluate at M3, in the GP group, the number of sessions completed and the therapeutic alliance using a scale.
Primary outcome measure Difference at M3 between the GP and GC groups in the quality of life score assessed using the SF-36 (Short-Form 36 Health Survey) scale.
Secondary outcome measures
1. Difference between D0 and M3, D0 and M6, M3 and M6 in quality of life scores based on the SF-36.
Change in Duke Health Profile scores over the 12 weeks of follow-up (S1 to S12).
2. Number and nature of assessment items that differ at inclusion and 3 months between GP and GC using the Neuropsychomotor Function Assessment Battery (NP-MOT), Body Image Questionnaire (BIQ), Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness Version 2 (MAIAI-2), Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile (AASP) tools
3. Depression intensity score on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), anxiety intensity score on the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS), psychomotor slowing down score on the CORE scale, anhedonia score on the SHAPS scale, and body image score on the QIC and MAIA-2 scales, sensory profile scores on the AASP scale, frequency of tonic-emotional manifestations, sub-scores of the NP-MOT battery, at M3.
4. Clinical improvement score: 50% reduction in HDRS score, scores AASP, score QIC, score MAIA-2 and items sub-scores NP-MOT
5. Total number of sessions and score on the French version of the Therapeutic Alliance Session Rating Scale at M3
The inclusion criteria for participants in this study are as follows: being between the ages of 20 and 60, having a diagnosis of major depressive disorder according to DSM-5 criteria, having a HDRS score greater than 16 indicating major symptoms, and being hospitalized or receiving care at one of the participating centres.
Additionally, participants must be affiliated with or benefiting from a social security scheme.
The participant and investigator must sign a written consent form that is both free and informed. This must be completed no later than the day of inclusion and before any required research examinations.
Non-inclusion criteria for this study are: psychiatric co-morbidity (excluding tobacco addiction, eating disorders, bipolar disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, schizophrenia and related disorders), sensory disability or known neurological pathology, history of neurological damage to the brain (especially strokes, tumours, trauma resulting in loss of consciousness lasting more than 10 minutes), and limited functional ability (difficulty moving about, performing manual tasks or moving about).
Participants may be excluded from the study if they are unable to understand the questionnaires or related information, unable to travel to the inclusion centre via personal vehicle or public transport, pregnant or breastfeeding (as declared), subject to compulsory hospitalisation or under guardianship or trusteeship, or lack social protection.
The research is conducted as follows:
* Pre-selection by the coordinating investigator or co-investigator, validation of participation criteria by the referring doctor and information of participants by the referring doctor or coordinating investigator or staff associated with the research.
* Reflection period: between 24 and 72 hours.
* V0: Inclusion Collect of written consent, Socio-demographic data (age, sex, family situation, profession, place of residence, environment), psychiatric history, treatments received (medicinal and non-medicinal), etc.
Quality of life scale (SF36) Clinical assessments: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS); Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS); psychomotor slowing down scale (CORE), Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (EES-10), Anhedonia Scale (SHAPS) Psychomotor assessment: sensory profile (AASP), body image (QIC, MAIA-2), tone (NP-MOT); general motor skills (NP-MOT), rhythm (NP-MOT); praxis (NP-MOT); manual dexterity (PPT) Randomisation: allocation of patients by drawing lots to the GP (personalised psychomotor therapy in addition to standard treatment) or GC (standard treatment) groups.
GP: Personalised psychomotor therapy: 1 psychomotor therapy session of 45 minutes per week for 12 weeks + Duke Health Scale.
The sessions will be based on static and dynamic body exercises involving muscle relaxation, breathing, sensations and moving the body. For each session the Session Rating Scale will be use.
GC: Usual care for 3 months with a weekly telephone interview + Duke's Health Scale.
* V1: visit at 1 month ± 4 days for an interim assessment Treatments received and/or modified in the last 4 weeks Clinical assessments: HDRS; HARS; CORE, EES-10, SHAPS
* V2: visit at 3 months ± 7 days Treatments received and/or modified in the last 3 months Clinical assessments: HDRS; HARS; CORE, EES-10, SHAPS Number of psychomotricity sessions performed Quality of life scale (SF36) Blind psychomotor assessment: AASP, QIC, MAIA-2, NP-MOT
* V3: visit at 6 months ± 7 days Treatments received and/or modified in the last 3 months Clinical assessments: HDRS; HARS; CORE, EES-10, SHAPS Quality of life scale (SF36) Blind psychomotor assessment: AASP, QIC, MAIA-2, NP-MOT Participants in the GC group were offered 12 sessions of psychomotor therapy.
At V2, the psychomotor assessment will be carried out by a psychomotor therapist who has not provided psychomotor therapy to the participant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
The sessions will be based on static and dynamic body exercises involving muscle relaxation, breathing, sensations and moving the body.
Control Group: Usual care for 12 weeks with a weekly telephone interview + Duke's Health Scale.
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Personalised psychomotor therapy group
1 psychomotor therapy session of 45 minutes per week for 12 weeks + Duke Health Scale.
Personalised psychomotor therapy
The content of the sessions will be personalised and determined solely by a qualified psychomotor therapist in charge of the patient, based on each participant's individual psychomotor profile, as determined from the initial assessment.
The 12 sessions will take place with the same PT in a dedicated room at the centre where the patient is being treated. The sessions will consist of a range of playful static and dynamic body exercises, including exercises for emotional and tonic regulation, tonic-postural adaptation, and perceptual-motor adaptation.
Not all participants in the GP group will have the same progression, nature or frequency of exercises over the 12 sessions.
The study only allows for individual treatment. Other therapeutic approaches such as balneotherapy sessions, animal mediation, adapted physical activity programmes or targeted relaxation programmes are not permitted.
During each session, the participant will be required to complete the Duke health profile.
Usual treatment group
Standard treatment for depression administered by a doctor + a weekly telephone interview for 12 weeks to administer the Duke Health Scale.
Usual treatment
Participants in the GC group will continue to receive their usual depression treatment without any changes to their prescribed therapies. Their participation in the study will involve weekly monitoring of their quality of life using the Duke scale. A nurse or psychomotor therapist will conduct this monitoring during a weekly fifteen-minute telephone interview. The follow-up will begin one week after the inclusion visit and will last for 12 weeks. Telephone appointments will be scheduled jointly with the participant based on their availability.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Personalised psychomotor therapy
The content of the sessions will be personalised and determined solely by a qualified psychomotor therapist in charge of the patient, based on each participant's individual psychomotor profile, as determined from the initial assessment.
The 12 sessions will take place with the same PT in a dedicated room at the centre where the patient is being treated. The sessions will consist of a range of playful static and dynamic body exercises, including exercises for emotional and tonic regulation, tonic-postural adaptation, and perceptual-motor adaptation.
Not all participants in the GP group will have the same progression, nature or frequency of exercises over the 12 sessions.
The study only allows for individual treatment. Other therapeutic approaches such as balneotherapy sessions, animal mediation, adapted physical activity programmes or targeted relaxation programmes are not permitted.
During each session, the participant will be required to complete the Duke health profile.
Usual treatment
Participants in the GC group will continue to receive their usual depression treatment without any changes to their prescribed therapies. Their participation in the study will involve weekly monitoring of their quality of life using the Duke scale. A nurse or psychomotor therapist will conduct this monitoring during a weekly fifteen-minute telephone interview. The follow-up will begin one week after the inclusion visit and will last for 12 weeks. Telephone appointments will be scheduled jointly with the participant based on their availability.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* HDRS \> 16
* Hospitalized or followed-up in one of the participating centers.
* Affiliated or beneficiary of a social security scheme.
* Free, informed and written consent signed by the participant and the investigator (no later than the day of inclusion and before any examination required by the research).
Exclusion Criteria
* Sensory impairment or proven neurological pathology
* History of neurological brain damage (including stroke, tumor, trauma resulting in loss of consciousness lasting more than 10 minutes)
* Limited functional ability (difficulty in moving about, performing manual tasks or moving about)
* Inability to understand questionnaires and study information
* Inability to travel to the inclusion center (personal vehicle, public transport)
* Pregnant or breast-feeding women, on declaration
* Forced hospitalization, subjects under guardianship or trusteeship, lack of social protection
20 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Direction Générale de l'Offre de Soins
OTHER_GOV
Centre Hospitalier Esquirol
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Aude Paquet
Psychomotor Therapist, Psychology PhD
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CH Esquirol
Limoges, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2023-A02678-37
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.