Pill-in-the-POCKET Oral Anticoagulation Strategy After AF Catheter Ablation

NCT ID: NCT06216769

Last Updated: 2024-05-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

400 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-02-01

Study Completion Date

2030-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The clinical benefit of pill-in-the-POCKET anticoagulation after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation remains uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the clinical benefit and safety of pill-in-the-POCKET anticoagulation after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation by randomizing into two groups: non-interrupted anticoagulation after the procedure and anticoagulation based on atrial fibrillation recurrence confirmed by implantable loop recorders.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Atrial fibrillation significantly increases the risk of thromboembolic complications, including stroke. Accordingly, current atrial fibrillation treatment guidelines recommend lifelong prescription of anticoagulants if the CHA2DS2-VASc score is 2 (for males) or 3 (for females) or higher (Class IA). With the recent advances in rhythm control treatment through catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation patients, increasing concerns are being raised about the need to continue anticoagulation after successful catheter ablation. However, current guidelines still require continued anticoagulation based on the baseline CHA2DS2-VASc score regardless of sinus conversion after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation.

A recently published observational study demonstrated that the risk of stroke was reduced by less than 0.7% per year in patients who discontinued anticoagulants after successful catheter ablation. Subsequent meta-analysis studies similarly suggested that anticoagulant discontinuation could be safe in patients whose rhythm was restored to sinus rhythm through catheter ablation. In addition, it was confirmed that anticoagulant discontinuation after catheter ablation was associated with only a 0.6% increase in the risk of thromboembolism as opposed to a 1.8% decrease in the risk of severe bleeding, such as intracranial hemorrhage and respiratory bleeding. Similar findings were also confirmed from large-scale non-randomized studies. However, there is still a lack of large-scale randomized study findings to support that anticoagulant discontinuation is appropriate in atrial fibrillation who are successful converted to sinus rhythm after catheter ablation.

Two single-arm pilot studies have been published about pill-in-the-pocket (PIP) anticoagulation. One is the REACT.COM (Rhythm Evaluation for Anticoagulation With Continuous Monitoring), and the other is the TACTIC-AF (Tailored Anticoagulation for Non-Continuous Atrial Fibrillation). In the above studies, continuous remote monitoring was performed using insertable cardiac monitors, dual-chamber pacemakers, or defibrillators. If atrial fibrillation persisted over a certain period during monitoring, anticoagulation was resumed for 30 days. This approach reduced the use of anticoagulants by 94% in the REACT.COM by resuming anticoagulation when atrial fibrillation recurrence persisted longer than 1 hour. TACTIC-AF observed a 75% reduction in time on anticoagulation using a threshold of 6 minutes or total burden \>6 h/d.

Conventionally, recurrence of atrial fibrillation has been confirmed through 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) or adhesive 24-hour (or 3-day, 7-day, 2-week) ECG monitoring. However, these methods are limited by the inability to continuously assess the exact atrial fibrillation burden during the follow-up period. As an alternative to this, implantable loop recorders (ILR) enabled with continuous heart rhythm monitoring have recently been widely used in clinical practice. These implantable loop recorders have shown desirable performance in measuring atrial fibrillation recurrence and burden. However, few studies have evaluated the role of continuous rhythm monitoring in guiding OAC in patients with AF.

This study is aimed to evaluate clinical benefits, including the appropriateness, efficacy, and safety of pill-in-the-POCKET anticoagulation, and establish its cost-effectiveness by comparing the incidence of major clinical events after randomization of atrial fibrillation patients scheduled to undergo catheter ablation into two groups: non-interrupted anticoagulation after the procedure and resumed anticoagulation based on atrial fibrillation recurrence confirmed by implantable loop recorders.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atrial Fibrillation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

non-interrupted group

Anticoagulation is continued regardless of atrial fibrillation recurrence.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Rivaroxaban

Intervention Type DRUG

Those in the non-interrupted anticoagulation group, anticoagulation is continued regardless of atrial fibrillation recurrence.

Those in the pill-in-the POCKET anticoagulation group will receive direct oral anticoagulation only if they have atrial fibrillation recur over 6 hours.

PIP anticoagulation group

Anticoagulation continuation will be determined based on the rhythm monitored by ILR. If atrial fibrillation persists more than 6 hours a day, anticoagulation should be started at that point on and continued for four weeks. Anticoagulation can be prescribed even in case of less-than-6-hour cumulative atrial fibrillation burden if the investigator decides that the anticoagulation is necessary.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Rivaroxaban

Intervention Type DRUG

Those in the non-interrupted anticoagulation group, anticoagulation is continued regardless of atrial fibrillation recurrence.

Those in the pill-in-the POCKET anticoagulation group will receive direct oral anticoagulation only if they have atrial fibrillation recur over 6 hours.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Rivaroxaban

Those in the non-interrupted anticoagulation group, anticoagulation is continued regardless of atrial fibrillation recurrence.

Those in the pill-in-the POCKET anticoagulation group will receive direct oral anticoagulation only if they have atrial fibrillation recur over 6 hours.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients who are scheduled to undergo atrial fibrillation catheter ablation due to atrial fibrillation refractory to antiarrhythmic drug treatment.
2. Patients with non-gender CHA2DS2-VASc score 1-4.
3. Patients who are taking direct oral anticoagulants (rivaroxaban, dabigatran, apixaban, edoxaban) and further plan taking them life-long to prevent stroke caused by atrial fibrillation.
4. Patients aged 19-89 (inclusive) who voluntarily sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with a stroke/transient ischemic attack history.
2. Patients with underlying diseases and bleeding findings contraindicated to anticoagulation (e.g., coagulation disorders, bleeding conditions, significant gastrointestinal bleeding within 6 months of enrollment, history of intracranial/intraocular/nontraumatic bleeding, thrombolysis within 48 hours of study enrollment).
3. Patients who are contraindicated to anticoagulants other than those listed above.
4. Patients who are hemodynamically unstable at the time of study enrollment: cardiogenic shock, treatment-unresponsive ventricular arrhythmia, or congestive heart failure (NYHA class IV) at the time of randomization.
5. Patients with underlying severe anemia (hemoglobin \<8 g/dL at baseline) or a transfusion history within four weeks before visit 1.
6. Patients with underlying severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count \<50,000/mm3)
7. The patient is under dialysis or chronic renal failure (creatinine clearance \<15ml/min)
8. The patient has severe liver disease (variceal bleeding, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, or jaundice).
9. The patient has a contraindication to the implantation of an implantable loop recorder (ILR) (such as limited immunocompetence or a wound-healing disorder).
10. The patient has severe valvular disease (valvular prosthesis, mitral valve repair; rheumatic mitral stenosis is excluded irrespective of the severity of the disease).
11. The patient has a non-arrhythmic condition necessitating long-term oral anticoagulation.
12. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
13. The patient is deemed high risk for non-cardioembolic stroke (i.e. significant carotid artery disease).
14. Patients who are taking warfarin or coumadin.
15. Patients who are taking dual antiplatelet agents.
16. Patients with a history of Cox-Maze surgery or atrial fibrillation catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation treatment.
17. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, or women of childbearing age who refuse to use a highly effective and medically acceptable form of contraception throughout the study. \*

\* Medically acceptable contraceptives include condoms, injectable or implantable contraceptives, intrauterine devices, and oral contraceptives.
18. Known or suspected malignancy with a history of chemotherapy within 1 year.
19. The patient has previously implanted cardiac implantable electronic devices or ILR.
20. Patients with a history of left atrial appendage occlusion or left atrial appendage closure.
21. The patient is participating in another randomized clinical trial and is under follow-up observation.
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

89 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Samjin Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Medtronic Korea Co., Ltd.

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Seoul National University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Eue-Keun Choi

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Seoul National University Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Eue-Keun Choi, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

82-2-2072-0688

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Eue-Keun Choi, MD, PhD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Passman R, Leong-Sit P, Andrei AC, Huskin A, Tomson TT, Bernstein R, Ellis E, Waks JW, Zimetbaum P. Targeted Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation Guided by Continuous Rhythm Assessment With an Insertable Cardiac Monitor: The Rhythm Evaluation for Anticoagulation With Continuous Monitoring (REACT.COM) Pilot Study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016 Mar;27(3):264-70. doi: 10.1111/jce.12864. Epub 2015 Nov 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26511221 (View on PubMed)

Waks JW, Passman RS, Matos J, Reynolds M, Thosani A, Mela T, Pederson D, Glotzer TV, Zimetbaum P. Intermittent anticoagulation guided by continuous atrial fibrillation burden monitoring using dual-chamber pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: Results from the Tailored Anticoagulation for Non-Continuous Atrial Fibrillation (TACTIC-AF) pilot study. Heart Rhythm. 2018 Nov;15(11):1601-1607. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.06.027. Epub 2018 Jul 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29981863 (View on PubMed)

Hindricks G, Pokushalov E, Urban L, Taborsky M, Kuck KH, Lebedev D, Rieger G, Purerfellner H; XPECT Trial Investigators. Performance of a new leadless implantable cardiac monitor in detecting and quantifying atrial fibrillation: Results of the XPECT trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010 Apr;3(2):141-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.109.877852. Epub 2010 Feb 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20160169 (View on PubMed)

Karasoy D, Gislason GH, Hansen J, Johannessen A, Kober L, Hvidtfeldt M, Ozcan C, Torp-Pedersen C, Hansen ML. Oral anticoagulation therapy after radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation and the risk of thromboembolism and serious bleeding: long-term follow-up in nationwide cohort of Denmark. Eur Heart J. 2015 Feb 1;36(5):307-14a. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu421. Epub 2014 Nov 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25368205 (View on PubMed)

Themistoclakis S, Corrado A, Marchlinski FE, Jais P, Zado E, Rossillo A, Di Biase L, Schweikert RA, Saliba WI, Horton R, Mohanty P, Patel D, Burkhardt DJ, Wazni OM, Bonso A, Callans DJ, Haissaguerre M, Raviele A, Natale A. The risk of thromboembolism and need for oral anticoagulation after successful atrial fibrillation ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Feb 23;55(8):735-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.039.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20170810 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

H-2304-038-1420

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Low-dose NOAC Versus GDMT After LAAO
NCT05960721 RECRUITING NA