Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopy for Right Colon Polyp Detection

NCT ID: NCT06216405

Last Updated: 2024-01-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

2000 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-01-20

Study Completion Date

2024-01-03

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the study is to assess whether the use of artificial intelligence improves polyp detection in a segment of the colon (the right colon).

To achieve this objective, patients will be divided into two groups: one will undergo a standard colonoscopy, the other a colonoscopy with the artificial intelligence software connected to the machine.

This software does not modify the colonoscopy technique in any way, and does not require the administration of any product to the patient.

The study will compare the detection rate of right colon polyps between the group of patients who underwent standard colonoscopy and those who underwent colonoscopy with artificial intelligence. If this number does not differ between the two groups, the investigators can conclude that there is no point in using artificial intelligence.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and remains one of the leading causes of mortality among neoplastic diseases in the world. Screening colonoscopy with detection and resection of colorectal polyps have reduced CRC incidence and mortality.

Nevertheless, colonoscopy is an imperfect screening test and its effectiveness is influenced by a range of variables including the skill and expertise of the endoscopist. Indeed, a significant proportion of colorectal neoplasia is missed during colonoscopic examinations. In the majority of studies, the rate of interval CRC among all CRCs ranged from 2% to 9% and interval cancers occurred more likely in the right colon. Interval cancers can result from missed lesion, incomplete removal or newly developed cancer. Most missed polyps are smaller than 10 mm in diameter and are sessile or flat in appearance. Therefore, sessile serrated adenomas (SSAs), which predominantly occur in the right colon, are easily missed because they are small and sessile.

Colonoscopy is less effective in screening right sided CRCs, mainly because of the increased miss rate for polyps with sessile or flat appearance. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly applied in gastrointestinal endoscopy, especially in the detection of colorectal polyps. In 2019, the first prospective randomized controlled trial including 1058 patients and comparing the polyp detection rate in colonoscopy with or without AI showed a significantly higher detection rate in the group with AI (29.1% vs 20.3%). Other previous prospective studies have showed that AI had great potential for improving colonic polyp detection.

To our knowledge, this is the first study to date to evaluate the performance of the AI in the detection of right colon polyps.

In this study, the investigators aim first of all to compare the rate of right colon polyp detection with AI-aided colonoscopy (AIC) to the rate obtained by the Standard (high-definition) colonoscopy (SC) in patient undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy. Then, the investigators would to evaluate the following endpoints:

1. Comparison of time required for AIC versus SC (withdrawal time)
2. Comparison of histological classification of all polyps detected in each group
3. Comparison of the number of right colon polyps detected in each group
4. A subgroup analysis comparing the rate of colon polyp detection between the two groups will be realized according to the procedure starting time (accounting for operator fatigability).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colon Cancer Colon Polyp Colon Lesion Colon Adenocarcinoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients will be randomized into the two groups:

* Experimental : AI-aided colonoscopy using GI Genius™ intelligent endoscopy system (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA)
* Control : Standard high-definition colonoscopy:

Randomization will be established according to a 1:1 ratio, balanced and per block of variable size, and stratified according to age (≤50 vs \>50 years-old) and on personal polyps or colorectal cancer history (yes vs no)
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
A single-blind, randomised study. Patient is not informed of the arm he is assigned to.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

AI-aided colonoscopy

Experimental arm : patients receive a colonoscopy using GI Genius™ intelligent endoscopy system (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Colonoscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Colonoscopy

Standard colonoscopy

Control arm :The artificial intelligence is not activated during the colonoscopy exam,the patient receive a standard high definition colonoscopy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Colonoscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Colonoscopy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Colonoscopy

Colonoscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age\>18 years
* Signed informed consent
* Affiliated to or beneficiary of a social security scheme

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with history of inflammatory bowel diseases
* Patients with history of familial polyposis syndrome
* Patients with history of right colonic resection.
* Pregnant or breastfeeding women
* Patient benefiting from a legal protection measure : tutorship, curatorship, patient deprived of freedom
* Adults who are unable to give their consent
* People under psychiatric care who are not able to understand the aim if this research
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cosmo Artificial Intelligence-AI Ltd

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

TANNOURY Jenny

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon

Paris, Île-de-France Region, France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2021-A01243-38

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.