Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopy for Right Colon Polyp Detection
NCT ID: NCT06216405
Last Updated: 2024-01-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
2000 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-01-20
2024-01-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
To achieve this objective, patients will be divided into two groups: one will undergo a standard colonoscopy, the other a colonoscopy with the artificial intelligence software connected to the machine.
This software does not modify the colonoscopy technique in any way, and does not require the administration of any product to the patient.
The study will compare the detection rate of right colon polyps between the group of patients who underwent standard colonoscopy and those who underwent colonoscopy with artificial intelligence. If this number does not differ between the two groups, the investigators can conclude that there is no point in using artificial intelligence.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Artificial Intelligence-assisted Colonoscopy in the Detection and Characterization of Colorectal Lesions
NCT07066046
Artificial Intelligence-assisted Colonoscopy for Detection of Colon Polyps
NCT04126265
Artificial Intelligence Performance in Colonoscopy in Daily Practice
NCT04837599
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Validation Study for Polyp Detection
NCT04378660
Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Adenoma Detection During Colonoscopy in FIT+ Patients.
NCT04691401
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Nevertheless, colonoscopy is an imperfect screening test and its effectiveness is influenced by a range of variables including the skill and expertise of the endoscopist. Indeed, a significant proportion of colorectal neoplasia is missed during colonoscopic examinations. In the majority of studies, the rate of interval CRC among all CRCs ranged from 2% to 9% and interval cancers occurred more likely in the right colon. Interval cancers can result from missed lesion, incomplete removal or newly developed cancer. Most missed polyps are smaller than 10 mm in diameter and are sessile or flat in appearance. Therefore, sessile serrated adenomas (SSAs), which predominantly occur in the right colon, are easily missed because they are small and sessile.
Colonoscopy is less effective in screening right sided CRCs, mainly because of the increased miss rate for polyps with sessile or flat appearance. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly applied in gastrointestinal endoscopy, especially in the detection of colorectal polyps. In 2019, the first prospective randomized controlled trial including 1058 patients and comparing the polyp detection rate in colonoscopy with or without AI showed a significantly higher detection rate in the group with AI (29.1% vs 20.3%). Other previous prospective studies have showed that AI had great potential for improving colonic polyp detection.
To our knowledge, this is the first study to date to evaluate the performance of the AI in the detection of right colon polyps.
In this study, the investigators aim first of all to compare the rate of right colon polyp detection with AI-aided colonoscopy (AIC) to the rate obtained by the Standard (high-definition) colonoscopy (SC) in patient undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy. Then, the investigators would to evaluate the following endpoints:
1. Comparison of time required for AIC versus SC (withdrawal time)
2. Comparison of histological classification of all polyps detected in each group
3. Comparison of the number of right colon polyps detected in each group
4. A subgroup analysis comparing the rate of colon polyp detection between the two groups will be realized according to the procedure starting time (accounting for operator fatigability).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
* Experimental : AI-aided colonoscopy using GI Genius™ intelligent endoscopy system (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA)
* Control : Standard high-definition colonoscopy:
Randomization will be established according to a 1:1 ratio, balanced and per block of variable size, and stratified according to age (≤50 vs \>50 years-old) and on personal polyps or colorectal cancer history (yes vs no)
DIAGNOSTIC
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
AI-aided colonoscopy
Experimental arm : patients receive a colonoscopy using GI Genius™ intelligent endoscopy system (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA)
Colonoscopy
Colonoscopy
Standard colonoscopy
Control arm :The artificial intelligence is not activated during the colonoscopy exam,the patient receive a standard high definition colonoscopy
Colonoscopy
Colonoscopy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Colonoscopy
Colonoscopy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Signed informed consent
* Affiliated to or beneficiary of a social security scheme
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with history of familial polyposis syndrome
* Patients with history of right colonic resection.
* Pregnant or breastfeeding women
* Patient benefiting from a legal protection measure : tutorship, curatorship, patient deprived of freedom
* Adults who are unable to give their consent
* People under psychiatric care who are not able to understand the aim if this research
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cosmo Artificial Intelligence-AI Ltd
INDUSTRY
Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
TANNOURY Jenny
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon
Paris, Île-de-France Region, France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2021-A01243-38
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.