Comparison of Mesh Nebulizer and Compressor Nebulizer With Pulmonary Function Test in Pediatric Asthma Attacks
NCT ID: NCT06211998
Last Updated: 2024-01-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-08-01
2023-08-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In the spirometry test, FEV1, FVC, FEF 25-75% values are valuable for the follow-up of asthma. While the FEV1/FVC ratio is above 80% in healthy children, it may decrease below 75% in diseases such as asthma. Likewise, FEV1 and FEF can be found to be low in 50-75% of asthma patients. In addition, these values can be used to determine the effectiveness of the inhaler given with the nebulizer given during the attack. Spirometry should be performed before and after administration of a bronchodilator to assess for reversibility (bronchodilator response \[BDR\]) even in children with a normal baseline FEV1 because many of these children will still have a BDR (both within the normal range and sometimes also supranormal) after treatment. Significant reversibility is indicated by an increase in FEV1 of ≥12 percent from baseline after administration of a short-acting bronchodilator. This definition for BDR positivity was established primarily in adults. An increase in FEV1 of ≥8 percent may be a better definition for BDR in children.
Inhaled short-acting beta-2 agonists, particularly albuterol (salbutamol), are the standard emergent treatment for acute asthma exacerbations in all patients based upon adult data. It is recommended to be given every 20 minutes in case of need for repeated doses in mild and moderate asthma attacks. Different types of nebulizers can be used for inhaler therapy; they can convert drugs into vapor form with sound waves, compressed air or by using electrical energy. While compressor nebulizers convert the liquid drug into aerosol form with compressed air, mesh nebulizers convert the drug into aerosol form with the vibrations they create with the help of electrical energy. Mesh nebulizers are more effective than other types of nebulizers, and the amount left in the chamber is less than other models, and it can decompose the drug into smaller particles and reach the more extreme branches of the lung.
In our study, the investigators aimed to determine which nebulizer type is more effective by comparing the effects of mesh nebulizer and compressor nebulizer on spirometry test in children presenting with asthma attack. Thus, the investigators planned to find the most comfortable and effective method for patients by determining the appropriate nebulization technique for patients.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Breath-Enhanced and T-Piece Nebulizers in Children With Acute Asthma
NCT02566902
Dynamic Respiratory Muscle Strength and Endurance in Childhood Asthma
NCT06053905
New Version Pulmicort Turbuhaler USA Children
NCT00642161
Development of an Active Video-Based High-Intensity Interval Exercise System in Children With Asthma
NCT06895642
Investigation of Lung Ventilation Inhomogeneity in Pediatric Asthma
NCT01095354
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group receiving inhaled treatment with compressor nebulizer
Salbutamol inhaler, Omron® CompAIR Pro NE-C900 Compressor Nebulizer (Omron Healthcare Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan) was used in Group 1
Group 1
Salbutamol inhaler, Omron® CompAIR Pro NE-C900 Compressor Nebulizer (Omron Healthcare Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan) was used in Group 1
Group receiving inhaled treatment with mesh nebulizer
Salbutamol inhaler, Mesh nebulizer (Aerogen Solo®, Aerogen Ltd, Galway, Ireland) was used in Group 2
Group 2
Salbutamol inhaler, Mesh nebulizer (Aerogen Solo®, Aerogen Ltd, Galway, Ireland) was used in Group 2
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Group 1
Salbutamol inhaler, Omron® CompAIR Pro NE-C900 Compressor Nebulizer (Omron Healthcare Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan) was used in Group 1
Group 2
Salbutamol inhaler, Mesh nebulizer (Aerogen Solo®, Aerogen Ltd, Galway, Ireland) was used in Group 2
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients aged 7-15 years and whose families gave consent for the study
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with underlying chronic disease (neurological disease such as epilepsy or congenital heart disease)
* Patients with obesity or malnutrition (to equalize drug dose efficacy)
* Patients with those receiving adrenaline, budesonide or ipratropium bromide therapy
* Patients who have used a long-acting bronchodilator in the last 12 hours or a short-acting bronchodilator in the last 2 hours
* Patients with fever above 37.5°C
* Patients with a saturation value below 92% at the time of admission
* Patients with severe asthma attack
* Patients with respiratory failure
* Patients who had problems in performing the test (such as mental retardation, patient incompatibility)
* Patients with diseases involving the chest muscles and those with chronic lung diseases (such as cystic fibrosis, bronchiectasis)
7 Years
15 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Berker Okay
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Berker Okay
M.D.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UHS Haseki Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Sultangazi, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Dunne RB, Shortt S. Comparison of bronchodilator administration with vibrating mesh nebulizer and standard jet nebulizer in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Apr;36(4):641-646. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.10.067. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
Pitance L, Vecellio L, Leal T, Reychler G, Reychler H, Liistro G. Delivery efficacy of a vibrating mesh nebulizer and a jet nebulizer under different configurations. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2010 Dec;23(6):389-96. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2010.0816. Epub 2010 Oct 19.
Yuksel H, Yasar A, Acikel A, Topcu I, Yilmaz O. Two different methods of lidocaine inhalation before diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy: effects on post-bronchoscopy respiratory symptoms. Turk J Med Sci. 2021 Aug 30;51(4):2101-2106. doi: 10.3906/sag-2012-130.
Okay B, Hatipoglu HU, Okay ZU, Sahin K, Yasar A. Comparing mesh and compressor nebulizers in pulmonary function test in pediatric asthma attacks: A double-blind randomized comparative clinical trial. Respir Med. 2025 Mar;238:107966. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2025.107966. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
140-2022
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.