Quantitative Analysis of PET/CT Images of Immune Related Side Effects in Metastatic Melanoma Patients

NCT ID: NCT06207747

Last Updated: 2024-01-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

70 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-09-01

Study Completion Date

2025-09-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

New cancer treatment with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has changed the way patients with melanoma and a variety of other cancers are being treated. Many pivotal trials that showed efficacy and safety of ICIs were performed in malignant melanoma. ICI can cause a different type of toxicity, called immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Though the exact pathophysiology is not completely understood, it is believed that irAEs are provoked by immune upregulation and inflammation. However, they can be serious, life-threatening, and warrant hospital admission as well. Dangerous irAEs include myocarditis, myositis, and pneumonitis, among others. Due to the novel mechanism of action, unpredictable nature, and wide usage of this type of treatment in the future, there is urgent need for better control of these potentially dangerous side effects. Early recognition and treatment of irAEs are of great importance in successful management.

Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) with \[18F\]2fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) is a sensitive, non-invasive, and widely used method for diagnosis and evaluation of treatment efficacy of malignant melanoma. The combination of 18F-FDG-PET and CT allows for assessment of both functional and morphological status of the lesions, and so facilitates better clinical decisions and patient care during treatment. It is also a very sensitive method for recognising inflammation, that can be a signal of irAEs.

Quantitative analysis is a rapidly evolving field of PET/CT image analysis. It includes both radiomics and artificial intelligence. Some studies have reported that quantitative analysis could predict efficacy of different cancer treatments. Quantitative image analysis in cancer response assessment is a rapidly expanding field, with the ultimate goal of clinical translation. However, in the specific instance of irAE diagnosis, it is not yet clear what role quantitative analysis of PET/CT scans can play.

The hypothesis is that quantitative analysis of PET/CT images provides more information on possible irAE, thus helping to treat these side effects more quickly and successfully.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

New cancer treatment with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has changed the way patients with melanoma and a variety of other cancers are being treated. Based on many positive randomised controlled trials in metastatic and neo-/adjuvant setting, ICI agents targeting programmed death-1 (PD-1), programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) have become invaluable in the treatment of different carcinomas. Many pivotal trials that showed efficacy and safety of ICIs were performed in malignant melanoma.

ICI can cause a different type of toxicity, called immune-related adverse events (irAEs), that can occur in any organ of the body. Though the exact pathophysiology is not completely understood, it is believed that irAEs are provoked by immune upregulation and inflammation. In general, they are less frequent compared to chemotherapy toxicities and usually low grade and manageable. However, they can be serious, life-threatening, and warrant hospital admission as well. Dangerous irAEs include myocarditis, myositis, and pneumonitis, among others. Due to the novel mechanism of action, unpredictable nature, and wide usage of this type of treatment in the future, there is urgent need for better control of these potentially dangerous side effects. Early recognition and treatment of irAEs are of great importance in successful management.

Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) with \[18F\]2fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) is a sensitive, non-invasive, and widely used method for diagnosis and evaluation of treatment efficacy of malignant melanoma. The combination of 18F-FDG-PET and CT allows for assessment of both functional and morphological status of the lesions, and so facilitates better clinical decisions and patient care during treatment. It is also a very sensitive method for recognising inflammation, that can be a signal of irAEs.

Quantitative analysis is a rapidly evolving field of PET/CT image analysis. It includes both radiomics and artificial intelligence. Quantitative analyses of medical images provide insight into hidden information about the image, which is usually not fully assessed by a nuclear medicine specialist (for example, information on the spatial heterogeneity of the tumour). Some studies have reported that quantitative analysis could predict efficacy of different cancer treatments. Quantitative image analysis in cancer response assessment is a rapidly expanding field, with the ultimate goal of clinical translation. However, in the specific instance of irAE diagnosis, it is not yet clear what role quantitative analysis of PET/CT scans can play.

The hypothesis is that quantitative analysis of PET/CT images provides more information on possible irAE, thus helping to treat these side effects more quickly and successfully. The association of quantitative PET/CT analysis with patient survival and the predictive value of an early-time point PET/CT scan in response to ICIs will be prospectively examined. The positive impact or irAE of autoimmune thyroiditis on the outcome of ICIs treatment will be also will be also evaluated.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Melanoma PET CT

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

This study will prospectively collect data from metastatic or stage III.D unresectable melanoma patients treated with ICIs and followed regularly with 18F-FDG PET/CT scans. Recruitment is expected to last 18 months. Predictive sample size is 100 melanoma patients.

Timing of PET/CT scans:

* Baseline PET/CT less than 4 weeks before first ICI infusion
* Follow-up: 4 weeks (+/- 5 days) after first infusion, 16 weeks (+/- 7 days) after first infusion, then after every 16 weeks (+/- 7 days) or before in case of PD suspicion .
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

This study will prospectively collect data from metastatic or stage III.D unresectable melanoma pts

Timing of PET/CT scans:

* Baseline PET/CT less than 4 weeks before first ICI infusion
* Follow-up: 4 weeks (+/- 5 days) after first infusion, 16 weeks (+/- 7 days) after first infusion, then after every 16 weeks (+/- 7 days) or before in case of PD suspicion

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

additional PET/CT at 4 weeks, analysing using quantative analysis

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Patient with metastatic melanoma will be monitored with additional PET/CT at 4 weeks, analysing using quantative analysis will be done.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

additional PET/CT at 4 weeks, analysing using quantative analysis

Patient with metastatic melanoma will be monitored with additional PET/CT at 4 weeks, analysing using quantative analysis will be done.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* \- Older than 18 years old
* Cyto- or histologically proven melanoma
* Stage III.D unresectable/ stage IV melanoma (AJCC classification, 8th edition, 2018)
* Asymptomatic brain metastases
* Three measurable metastatic lesions
* 1st, 2nd, further line of systemic treatment with ICIs (either ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, or combination)
* PS WHO 0-2 (ECOG criteria)
* FDG-PET within four weeks of treatment initiation
* Written consent form

Exclusion Criteria

* Symptomatic brain metastases
* PS WHO \> 2 (ECOG criteria)
* Contraindications for ICI treatment
* Other malignant diseases (not included: BCC, SCC, in situ carcinoma of cervix, other cured malignant diseases without relapse more than three years)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Institute of Oncology Ljubljana

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nežka Hribernik, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Slovenia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Institute of Oncology Ljubljana

Ljubljana, , Slovenia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Slovenia

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hribernik N, Huff DT, Studen A, Zevnik K, Klanecek Z, Emamekhoo H, Skalic K, Jeraj R, Rebersek M. Quantitative imaging biomarkers of immune-related adverse events in immune-checkpoint blockade-treated metastatic melanoma patients: a pilot study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022 May;49(6):1857-1869. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05650-3. Epub 2021 Dec 27.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 34958422 (View on PubMed)

Huff DT, Ferjancic P, Namias M, Emamekhoo H, Perlman SB, Jeraj R. Image intensity histograms as imaging biomarkers: application to immune-related colitis. Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2021 Sep 30;7(6):10.1088/2057-1976/ac27c3. doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/ac27c3.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 34534974 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KME RS 0120-256/2020-14

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Imaging FDG Flare in Melanoma
NCT02791594 COMPLETED