Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
300 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-02-07
2027-08-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Stroke complications and the risk of stroke recurrence are highly dependent on the control of vascular risk factors. Thus, the secondary prevention of stroke involves profound lifestyle modifications including substance use cessation and diet changes.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Post-Stroke Secondary Prevention With Digital Monitoring
NCT06837311
Involvement of the Physician in Primary Prevention and Pre-hospital Management of Stroke
NCT03975218
Prevent Return of Stroke Study
NCT01027273
Determinants of Adherence to Post-stroke/Transient Ischemic Attack Secondary Prevention Treatment: Cohort Study in the Rhône
NCT03153020
Coordinated, Collaborative, Comprehensive, Family-based, Integrated, Technology-enabled Stroke Care
NCT04000971
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Post-stroke emotional impairments are frequent, post-stroke depression and anxiety being the most frequent with a prevalence of 30% and 25% respectively. The consequences of these "invisible handicaps" are observable across a wide range of stroke clinical outcomes. They have been shown to be associated with increased mortality, reduced functional status, decreased quality of life, medication adherence, efficient use of rehabilitation services and cognitive impairment.
Conversely, despite the obvious connection between drugs and stroke, the prevalence and types of SRADs among stroke patients together with their impact and potential interplay with emotional impairments on post-stroke outcomes are still overlooked. The literature is too sparse to guide clinical practice.
Paradoxically, clinicians are facing the devastating effects of addiction in this population and must be informed by solid empirical data. Moreover, the COVID19 pandemic has critically favored or exacerbated poor lifestyle habits (legal and illicit drug use, compulsive overeating) and negative affectivity - including mood and anxiety disorders -, not only in the adult but also the adolescent population. In this context, we believe it is legitimate to expect a noticeable impact on stroke incidence and prognosis in the coming years.
It thus appears that there is an urgent need to allow stroke healthcare professionals to be better equipped to screen and treat problematic substance use in stroke patients. The WHO promotes tools that could effectively support these two priorities.
First, the WHO sponsored the development of the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) to address the need for a reliable and valid screening test. The core criteria chosen for the development of such an instrument were the following: adaptable to different cultures, languages and settings; flexible enough to identify different substances and different patterns of substance use; capable of screening for risk as well as for confirmed cases; ability to link easily into a brief intervention; available at a reasonable/or no cost. Planning and development of the instrument followed a three-phase program; the instrument that is currently available is the ASSIST version 3, for which the French language validation has been already conducted among clients attending primary health care, psychiatric, addiction, and geriatric treatment facilities. These study findings strongly suggest that the ASSIST tool would be suitable for stroke populations.
Additionally, the potential pivotal role of eHealth development has been advocated by the WHO, who considers e-health as a cost-effective and secure use of information and communication technologies (ICT) in support of health and health-related fields. There is a pressing need to develop such a device for the early detection of post-stroke neuropsychiatric complications for each individual patient. The rapid expansion of ambulatory monitoring techniques, such as Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA), allows daily evaluations of symptoms in real time and in the natural contexts of daily life. We have previously validated the feasibility and validity of EMA to assess daily life emotional symptoms after stroke, demonstrating its utility to investigate their evolution during the 3 months following stroke and to identify early predictors of post-stroke depression such as stress reactivity and social support, suggesting that EMA could be used in the early personalized care management of these neuropsychiatric complications. Moreover, we have developed an Ecological Momentary Intervention via smartphone to improve the outcome of post-stroke emotional status. This eHealth device uses algorithms for detecting at-risk patients depending on the level of mood symptomatology (DSM5 criteria for depression, generalized anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, suicidal risk) measured by a daily 3-5 min EMA at the end of the day. Data are sent on-line via secured servers and coded alerts are sent to the hospital clinical team in case risk levels are reached and/or if high levels of symptom persist. This approach permits clinicians to rapidly contact patients and to initiate psychiatric care without requiring the usual 4-month wait (on average) before the standard care follow-up visit. Specifically, based on the alerts, the care pathway is adapted according to each individual condition. The eHealth device is flexible and can be optimized by implementing algorithms and alerts indexing difficulties in controlling substance and unhealthy food intake.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standardized clinical evaluations, and screening of substance use
Standardized clinical evaluations, and screening of substance use will be performed for all using the World Health Organization Alcohol, Smoking and Drug Abuse Screening Test (ASSIST).
Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST)
Standardized clinical evaluations and screening of substance use using the World Health Organization Alcohol, Smoking and Drug Abuse Screening Test (ASSIST)
Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA)
Daily EMA evaluations during 12 weeks
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST)
Standardized clinical evaluations and screening of substance use using the World Health Organization Alcohol, Smoking and Drug Abuse Screening Test (ASSIST)
Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA)
Daily EMA evaluations during 12 weeks
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* At least 18 years of age and younger than 80 years;
* Recent (≤ 15 days) clinically symptomatic ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke documented through brain imaging (CT or MRI) or a Transient Ischemic Attack with an ABCD2 score ≥ 4;
* Returning to the Bordeaux Hospital neurovascular unit for the standard care 3-months post-stroke follow-up visit;
* National Institute Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) \< 15;
* modified Rankin scale ≤ 4;
* No severe cognitive impairment as defined by the neurologist;
* Written informed consent by the patient;
* Coverage by the French National Health Insurance.
Exclusion Criteria
* Severe aphasia (NIHSS item 9 ≥ 2) and/or Severe visual impairment interfering with the completion of evaluations;
* Severely impaired physical and/or mental health that, according to the neurologist, may affect the participant's capacity to participate in the study;
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding;
* Inability to read French;
* Individuals under legal protection or unable to personally express their consent
* Participation in another protocol modifying the patient's follow-up status
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Bordeaux
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Igor Sibon
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Sylvie Berthoz
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
CNRS UMR 5287 - INCIA
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU de Bordeaux
Bordeaux, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CHUBX 2022/56
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.