Implementation of Long-acting Cabotegravir + Rilpivirine Administration Out of "HIV Units".
NCT ID: NCT06159894
Last Updated: 2025-06-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
90 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-12-18
2025-07-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study Evaluating Implementation Strategies for Cabotegravir (CAB)+ Rilpivirine (RPV) Long-acting (LA) Injectables for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-1 Treatment in European Countries
NCT04399551
Identification of Barriers and Facilitators of Implementation of the Out-of-Hospital Administration of the Long- Acting Combination Cabotegravir+Rilpivirina.
NCT06643897
A Real-life Study of the Use of Cabotegravir Plus Rilpivirine Long-acting in ART-experienced Pre-treated People With HIV
NCT06518408
Use of Long-Acting Injectable Cabotegravir/Rilpivirine for the Treatment of HIV in Belgium
NCT06424964
Study to Assess the Effects of Cabotegravir (CAB) and Rilpivirine (RPV) Long-Acting (LA) Injections Following Sub-cutaneous (SC) Administration Compared With Intramuscular (IM) Administration in Adult Participants Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV-1) Infection in the FLAIR Study
NCT05896748
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Treatment with LA CAB + RPV and follow-up at Specialist-Care centers (Specialist-Care arm).
Treatment with LA CAB + RPV and follow-up at Specialist-Care centers (Specialist-Care arm).
Specialist-Care arm
The study will evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the administration of CAB LA + RPV LA as perceived by patients. The focus will be upon both Polyvalent Day Hospital units vs Specialist-Care centers. The evaluations of the two-implementation strategies and their differences will be assessed in essentially descriptive terms.
The study will also explore the fidelity, uptake and costs of LA CAB + RPV administration upon both Polyvalent Day Hospital units vs Specialist-Care Centers. The utility of the implementation strategies devised to support the delivery LA CAB + RPV out of HIV units/Internal medicine services will also be explored.
Finally, the study will assess the safety, tolerability and effectiveness LA CAB + RPV administration in Polyvalent Day Hospital units vs Specialist-Care centers in the total sample, as per clinical practice.
Treatment with LA CAB + RPV and follow-up in Polyvalent Day Hospital units (Day Hospital arm).
Treatment with LA CAB + RPV and follow-up in Polyvalent Day Hospital units (Day Hospital arm).
DAY HOSPITAL ARM
The study will evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the administration of CAB LA + RPV LA as perceived by patients. The focus will be upon both Polyvalent Day Hospital units vs Specialist-Care centers. The evaluations of the two-implementation strategies and their differences will be assessed in essentially descriptive terms.
The study will also explore the fidelity, uptake and costs of LA CAB + RPV administration upon both Polyvalent Day Hospital units vs Specialist-Care Centers. The utility of the implementation strategies devised to support the delivery LA CAB + RPV out of HIV units/Internal medicine services will also be explored.
Finally, the study will assess the safety, tolerability and effectiveness LA CAB + RPV administration in Polyvalent Day Hospital units vs Specialist-Care centers in the total sample, as per clinical practice.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
DAY HOSPITAL ARM
The study will evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the administration of CAB LA + RPV LA as perceived by patients. The focus will be upon both Polyvalent Day Hospital units vs Specialist-Care centers. The evaluations of the two-implementation strategies and their differences will be assessed in essentially descriptive terms.
The study will also explore the fidelity, uptake and costs of LA CAB + RPV administration upon both Polyvalent Day Hospital units vs Specialist-Care Centers. The utility of the implementation strategies devised to support the delivery LA CAB + RPV out of HIV units/Internal medicine services will also be explored.
Finally, the study will assess the safety, tolerability and effectiveness LA CAB + RPV administration in Polyvalent Day Hospital units vs Specialist-Care centers in the total sample, as per clinical practice.
Specialist-Care arm
The study will evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the administration of CAB LA + RPV LA as perceived by patients. The focus will be upon both Polyvalent Day Hospital units vs Specialist-Care centers. The evaluations of the two-implementation strategies and their differences will be assessed in essentially descriptive terms.
The study will also explore the fidelity, uptake and costs of LA CAB + RPV administration upon both Polyvalent Day Hospital units vs Specialist-Care Centers. The utility of the implementation strategies devised to support the delivery LA CAB + RPV out of HIV units/Internal medicine services will also be explored.
Finally, the study will assess the safety, tolerability and effectiveness LA CAB + RPV administration in Polyvalent Day Hospital units vs Specialist-Care centers in the total sample, as per clinical practice.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Documented evidence of plasma HIV-1 RNA measurements \<50 copies/mL in one determination \> 6 months prior to Screening
2. Documented evidence of plasma HIV-1 RNA measurements \<50 copies/mL in one determination \< 6 months prior to Screening If the last documented evidence of plasma HIV-1 RNA measurements \<50 copies/mL is into the 45 days prior to Screening visit, this determination could replace the screening determination. If all the laboratory results from the Screening Visit are available in the 45 days prior to screening visit, Screening visit and Baseline Visit could be done the same day.
4\. Ability to understand informed consent form and other relevant regulatory documents.
5\. Prior to starting LA CAB + RPV injections, healthcare professionals should have carefully selected patients who agree to the required injection schedule and counsel patients about the importance of adherence to scheduled dosing visits to help maintain viral suppression and reduce the risk of viral rebound and potential development of resistance with missed doses.
6\. Investigators may enrol eligible subjects according to their availability and accessibility.
7\. LA CAB +RPV injection may be preceded by an optional 1-month oral lead-in (OLI) according to the physician's judgement; 8. Participants will be monitored according to usual standard care at their physician's discretion.
9\. Females of child bearing potential will be required to use a highly effective method of contraception. A female, may be eligible to enter and participate in the study if she: i) Is of non-child-bearing potential defined as either post-menopausal (12 months of spontaneous amenorrhea and ≥50 years of age) or physically incapable of becoming pregnant with documented tubal ligation, hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy.Female participants who have stopped menstruating for ≥12 months and have \<50 years of age but do not have documentation\* of ovarian hormonal failure must have a serum FSH test result at screening that is within the post-menopausal range based on the reference provided in the Central Laboratory Manual ii) Note: FSH test in the prior 12 months within the post-menopausal range iii) Is of child-bearing potential with a negative pregnancy test at both Screening and Visit 1 and agrees to use one of the highly effective methods to avoid pregnancy documented
Exclusion Criteria
2\. Present or past evidence of viral resistance to agents of the NNRTI or INSTI class or prior treatment failure with agents of NNRTI or INSTI class
3\. Any contraindication for LA CAB, LA RPV, oral Cabotegravir or Rilpivirine (see EU SmPC)
4\. Women who are pregnant, breastfeeding or plan to become pregnant or breastfeed during the study
5\. Any evidence of a current Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Stage 3 disease, except cutaneous Kaposi's sarcoma not requiring systemic therapy, and CD4+ counts \<200 cells/µL are not exclusionary.
6\. Participants with moderate to severe hepatic impairment
7\. Any pre-existing physical or mental condition (including substance use disorder) which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may interfere with the participant's ability to comply with the dosing schedule and/or protocol evaluations or which may compromise the safety of the participant
8\. Evidence of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection based on the results of testing at Screening for Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), Hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc), Hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) and HBV DNA as follows: 8.1. Participants positive for HBsAg are excluded; 8.2. Participants negative for anti-HBs but positive for anti-HBc (negative HBsAg status), whether negative or positive for HBV DNA, are excluded 8.3. Note: Participants positive for anti-HBc (negative HBsAg status) and positive for anti-HBs (past and/or current evidence) are immune to HBV and are not excluded.
9\. Asymptomatic individuals with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection will not be excluded, however Clinicians must carefully assess if therapy specific for HCV infection is required; participants who require or qualify for immediate HCV treatment are excluded(Investigators should consult current treatment guidelines when considering choice of therapy for individuals with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Participants with hepatitis C virus infection should have undergone appropriate work-up, the chronic hepatitis C infection should not be advanced, and not anticipated to require introduction of new HCV therapy (e.g. with oral direct acting antivirals) during the course of the study).
10\. Unstable liver disease (as defined by any of the following: presence of ascites, encephalopathy, coagulopathy, hypoalbuminemia, esophageal or gastric varices, or persistent jaundice or cirrhosis, or decompensated cirrhosis (eg. ascites, encephalopathy, or variceal bleeding)), known biliary abnormalities (with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones or otherwise stable chronic liver disease per investigator assessment)
11\. History of liver cirrhosis with or without hepatitis viral co-infection.
12\. Ongoing or clinically relevant pancreatitis
13\. Ongoing malignancy other than cutaneous Kaposi's sarcoma, basal cell carcinoma, or resected, non-invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, or cervical and anal intraepithelial neoplasia.
14\. History or presence of allergy or intolerance to the study drugs or their components or drugs of their class. In addition, if heparin is used during pharmacokinetic sampling, participants with a history of sensitivity to heparin or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia must not be enrolled.
15\. Current platelet count\<100,000 x109/Land/or those with a current or anticipated need for chronic or systemic anticoagulation or a history of known or suspected bleeding disorder, including a history of prolonged bleeding.
16\. Any evidence of primary resistance based on the presence of any major known Integrase inhibitor (INSTI) or Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) resistance-associated mutation.
17\. Any verified Grade 4 laboratory abnormality at screening.
18\. Subjects has estimated creatinine clearance \<50mL/minute per 1.73 meter square via Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) Method
19\. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≥5x ULN, OR ALT ≥3 x ULN and bilirubin ≥1.5 x ULN (with \> 35% direct bilirubin).
20\. Treatment with an HIV-1 immunotherapeutic vaccine within 90 days of Screening 21. Use of medications which are associated with Torsade de Pointes.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de la Fundación Jiménez Díaz
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Fundación Jimenez Díaz
Madrid, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IMAdART
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.