Restricted Eating Time in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes
NCT ID: NCT06152588
Last Updated: 2025-05-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
160 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-03-21
2026-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Feasibility of Time-Restricted Eating in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes
NCT05375695
Effect of Time-restricted Eating on Behaviour and Metabolism in Overweight Individuals at High Risk of Type 2 Diabetes
NCT03854656
Intermittent Fasting for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT05860413
The Metabolic Impact of Intermittent Carbohydrate Restriction in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT06144593
Time Restricted Eating for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes
NCT05225337
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Lifestyle interventions are complex, affecting many aspects of peoples' daily life. Dietary restrictions often result in rapid weight loss but the weight is gradually regained by many. Barriers to implement and maintain dietary changes include relapse of old habits and lack of knowledge, support, and insights into the type and amount of foods eaten. Previous lifestyle interventions targeting weight loss in T2D show efficacy for improving markers of metabolic and cardiovascular risk, including body weight and glycaemia during the intervention, but weight regain is often present. One reason may be that the intervention is not modified according to the needs of the target group. Often, weight loss interventions are shaped by a 'one size fits all' approach where both individual capabilities and motivation as well as social and contextual factors are more or less ignored. A user-based design could facilitate enrolment of participants and promote implementation and maintenance of the intervention among participants.
Intermittent fasting regimens have been suggested as efficient strategies for improving cardiometabolic health to a greater extent than can be attributed to the reduction in energy intake alone. TRE limits the time available for food intake to typically 8-10 hours/day without other dietary restrictions and has been put forward as a novel, acceptable, and safe strategy that has shown promising effects on body weight, glucose metabolism, appetite, and cardiometabolic health in individuals at high risk of T2D.
Although it has been suggested that TRE is a safe and feasible intervention, the longer-term effectiveness of TRE on glycaemic control and weight loss in individuals with T2D is unknown alongside the long-term acceptability and sustainability. Additionally, potential social and contextual challenges associated with integration of TRE into ordinary daily life structure and routines call for new approaches to support the individual in implementing and maintaining the strategy.
Overall, the RESET2 study consists of three phases; 1) Need assessment, 2) Pilot study, and 3) RCT. The aim of the present study (RCT) is to investigate the effectiveness of implementing a 1-year TRE-based intervention in individuals with overweight/obesity and T2D. Participants will attend 6 visits at Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen (SDCC): Visit 0 (screening), Visit 1 (baseline, minimum 10 days after screening), Visit 2 (10 days prior to visit 3), Visit 3 \[3 months (12 weeks) after baseline\], Visit 4 (10 days prior to visit 5), Visit 5 \[12 months (52 weeks) after baseline\].
The specific objectives are:
1. To investigate the effect of a 1-year TRE intervention on changes in glycaemic control (HbA1c) in individuals with overweight/obesity and T2D.
2. To investigate the effects of a 1-year TRE intervention on changes in body weight, fat mass, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) recorded time in range (TIR 3.9-10.0 mmol/l), and use of antidiabetic medication in individuals with overweight/obesity and T2D.
3. To describe changes in cardiometabolic risk factors (including fat-free mass, blood lipids, markers of kidney and liver function and inflammation, hormones involved in glucose metabolism and appetite control, liver fat, blood pressure, waist- and hip circumference), time below range (TBR), time above range (TAB), cognition, food preferences and reward, dim light melatonin onset (DLMO), and patient-reported outcomes including self-rated health, physical activity, well-being, diabetes distress, depression, food intake, and sleep quality.
4. To investigate the effects of a 3-month TRE intervention on changes in brain insulin sensitivity (sub-study).
5. To describe the extent to which the intervention was conducted as planned (visits, conversations, phone calls, peer support activities).
6. To describe the extent to which participants participated in support-related activities.
7. To explore participants' experiences with following TRE throughout a year including how they managed to keep their eating window and how the supporting activities and individualized approach worked for them (sub-population).
8. To explore the results from objectives 1-7 in relation to the extent the participants adhered to eating windows.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Time-restricted eating
TRE group for 1 year: The intervention consists of a 3-month (12 weeks) strict TRE period, where participants follow the same eating window each day with minimal support, followed by a 9-month (40 weeks) period of individually adjusted TRE according to their experiences.
Time restricted eating
3 months (12 weeks) strict TRE intervention: Participants will be instructed to reduce their eating window by minimum 3 hours compared to habitual eating, with an eating window below 10 hours. The timing of the eating window is self-selected but should be placed between 6 am and 8 pm. Diet during the eating window is ad libitum with no further dietary restrictions.
9 months (40 weeks) individually adjusted TRE intervention: An individual plan will be made based on participants' experiences during the strict TRE. Different choices of individual adjustment and support will be provided, including 1) eating window adjustments and the possibility of 'days off', 2) provision of a list of allowed calorie and caffeine free beverages that can be consumed outside the window, 3) continued opportunity to participate in peer-support group meetings, 4) extra phone calls with a project worker to discuss challenges or strategies to continue with TRE etc., and 5) further involvement of relatives.
Control
Control group for 1 year: Participants will be instructed to continue their habitual lifestyle during the study and they will follow standard care with regular visits at the SDCC clinic 3-4 times/year.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Time restricted eating
3 months (12 weeks) strict TRE intervention: Participants will be instructed to reduce their eating window by minimum 3 hours compared to habitual eating, with an eating window below 10 hours. The timing of the eating window is self-selected but should be placed between 6 am and 8 pm. Diet during the eating window is ad libitum with no further dietary restrictions.
9 months (40 weeks) individually adjusted TRE intervention: An individual plan will be made based on participants' experiences during the strict TRE. Different choices of individual adjustment and support will be provided, including 1) eating window adjustments and the possibility of 'days off', 2) provision of a list of allowed calorie and caffeine free beverages that can be consumed outside the window, 3) continued opportunity to participate in peer-support group meetings, 4) extra phone calls with a project worker to discuss challenges or strategies to continue with TRE etc., and 5) further involvement of relatives.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Overweight or obesity (BMI ≥25 kg/m2)
* T2D with HbA1c\>53 mmol/mol
* Habitual eating window ≥12 h/day (incl. foods/snacks and energy-containing beverages)
Exclusion Criteria
* Use of fast acting insulin and combination insulin products
* Habitual CGM use
* A wish to adhere to Ramadan
* For women: current/planned pregnancy or lactation
* Alcohol or drug abuse (judged by investigator) or treatment with disulfiram
* Severe hypoglycaemia within last year (Severe hypoglycaemia, as defined by the American Diabetes Association (ADA), denotes severe cognitive impairment requiring external assistance for recovery)
* Inability to understand written and oral information in Danish
* Unable or unwilling to adhere to TRE; for instance, due to competing medical conditions.
* Medical condition which, based on investigators assessment, challenges participation including but not limited to severe heart, vascular or lung disease, cancer, chemotherapy, psychiatric, gastrointestinal, rheumatic, or endocrine diseases etc.
* Concomitant participation in other intervention study
* Inability to perform neuropsychological tests (e.g., severe vision and hearing impairment that can-not be improved with aids such as glasses and hearing aids, or language barrier.)
* Participants who do not wish to be informed about accidental findings by MR.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Leeds
OTHER
Salk Institute for Biological Studies
OTHER
University of Copenhagen
OTHER
Glostrup University Hospital, Copenhagen
OTHER
Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jonas S Quist, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen
Herlev, Denmark, Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H-23035125
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.