The Effect of High-power Laser Therapy on Pain, Functional Disability, Range of Motion and Pressure Pain Threshold in Subjects With Radicular Low Back Pain Due to Intervertebral Disc Herniation
NCT ID: NCT06151704
Last Updated: 2025-09-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
36 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-05-09
2024-12-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Given the prevalence of disorders attributable to L4-L5 and L5-S1 intervertebral disc herniation, it is imperative to consider the potential risks associated with both surgical and non-surgical medical interventions, such as corticosteroid injections. Laser therapy emerges as a viable modality within the realm of physical therapy, particularly in the mitigation of inflammation. The modulating effects of laser therapy on inflammation have been documented, with no significant side effects reported thus far. Should the efficacy of laser therapy be substantiated, it could be incorporated into the suite of treatments endorsed by authoritative guidelines pertaining to back pain. Patients afflicted with radicular back pain have been the beneficiaries of assistance from physiotherapists possessing specialized knowledge in effective dosimetry. The objectives of this assistance include the amelioration of pain symptoms, the enhancement of functional indicators, the augmentation of the range of motion, and the modulation of the pressure pain threshold, all without the concern of side effects. Furthermore, adherence to the correct treatment protocol is of paramount importance.
The main objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of active high-power laser compared to sham laser on pain, disability, range of motion, and pressure pain threshold in patients with radicular low back pain due to lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Low-level Laser Therapy Versus Shock Wave Therapy on Pain and Function in Patients With Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain
NCT06487338
Low Level Lazer Therapy Effect on Vertebral Artery Blood Flow in Elderly With Cervical Disc Degeneration
NCT06025175
Effect of High Versus Low-level Laser Therapy in Patients of Lumber Radiculopathy
NCT06240845
The Effect of Dry Needling Compared to Lumbar Spine Mobilization in Patients With Chronic Non Specific Low Back Pain
NCT05214456
Effectiveness of High Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT) in Patients With Chronic Lumbar Radiculopathy Due to Disc Herniation.
NCT06651775
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
"Numerous studies have meticulously examined the available treatments for intervertebral disc lesions, encompassing both invasive and non-invasive approaches. Surgical interventions, a common modality, have been thoroughly evaluated. However, it is essential to note that patients who underwent surgery did not experience significantly greater pain relief or a more expedited return to work after a 4-year period compared to those who did not undergo surgery. Another invasive treatment involves the administration of injectable corticosteroids. A systematic review conducted by Yang et al. in 2020 meticulously compared physiotherapy interventions (excluding laser therapy) with epidural corticosteroid injections. Surprisingly, the long-term effects of epidural corticosteroid injections were found to be no more efficacious than those of physiotherapy treatments. In a 2015 study by Johnson et al., the pivotal role of TNF-α and IL-1β was elucidated. While these mediators are indispensable for normal physiological function, excessive secretion can indeed be detrimental. The study underscored the importance of precisely controlling the timing of inflammatory secretions and preventing an unwarranted surge in mediator levels to enhance the effectiveness of future treatments." In a 2015 guideline study of medical interventions, including medication, researchers found insufficient evidence to either accept or reject the effects of NSAIDs, muscle relaxants, oral corticosteroids, analgesics, and neuromodulators. Similarly, in a 2017 study by Ghaseem et al., although the evidence for laser therapy was limited, the guideline recommended the use of lasers for patients with low back pain. A study conducted by Maher et al. in 2004 examined the effectiveness of various physiotherapy treatments in systematic studies. Among these treatments, exercise therapy, laser therapy, and manual therapy were the most effective. However, treatments such as hydrotherapy, traction, magnet, and TENS lacked sufficient evidence. Recent studies by Alayat et al. in 2014 did not accept laser therapy as a standalone treatment; its effectiveness has been described only in combination with other physiotherapy treatments.
"Laser, an acronym for Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation, possesses three distinct characteristics in the realm of light: 1) Monochromaticity, 2) Coherence (identical phase), and 3) Collimation (high convergence). In this methodology, light energy is projected onto the tissues of the body and absorbed, thereby stimulating or inhibiting enzymatic activity at the cellular level. This instigates physiological reactions, as well as anti-inflammatory and analgesic processes.
Laser therapy promotes interactions between the nucleus and the cytoplasm by augmenting physiological activity within the cell. Near-infrared wavelengths enhance the production of Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP) and alleviate pain and edema by stimulating Cytochrome c oxidase (CcO) at the mitochondrial level. Post-laser irradiation in tissues, there is an observed increase in the levels of beta-endorphins and morphine-mimetic substances, which are natural analgesics produced by the body.
Furthermore, laser irradiation augments lymph flow, decreases prostaglandin synthesis, mitigates the severity of inflammation, and expedites wound healing by enhancing growth factors and phagocytosis, increasing cytokine secretion, promoting angiogenesis, and stimulating fibroblasts and keratinocytes.
Therapeutic lasers, exhibiting a photobiomodulation effect and utilized for pain reduction, are categorized into two types: Low-Level Laser Therapy (power ranging from 5 to 500 mW) and High-Intensity Laser Therapy (power exceeding 500 mW). Laser power is defined as energy per unit time, hence, the use of a high-power laser enables energy to reach the target tissue in a shorter span of time, rendering it more suitable for the treatment of larger areas.
According to the Arendt-Schulz law, a physiological response is elicited in the target tissue once sufficient energy has been delivered to it. In this context, the parameters of the laser and its therapeutic capabilities are of paramount importance." The objective of this study was to ascertain the impact of high-intensity lasers on patients suffering from lower back pain, accompanied by radicular pain in a lower limb, a condition attributed to intervertebral disc herniation. Existing evidence implies that the chronic stage of intervertebral disc herniation may involve inflammatory factors, which could be a primary cause of lower back pain with radicular pain. Given its anti-inflammatory properties and absence of side effects for the patient, the high-power laser could serve as an effective treatment modality in the realm of physiotherapy for patients experiencing radicular lower back pain. This, however, is contingent on the physiotherapist's understanding of dosimetry and the aim of specific dosing therapy. Conversely, the dearth of current research on high-intensity lasers and their impact on lower back pain resulting from intervertebral disc herniation, coupled with diffuse pain in the lower extremities, and the absence of an appropriate treatment protocol, such as the application of high-intensity lasers on pain propagation and proper dosimetry with clinical symptoms, led us to identify a need for community therapy in this study.
The rationale behind selecting exercise therapy as a standard treatment for both groups was the advantageous effects of laser therapy when used in conjunction with exercise therapy. Current studies on the influence of motor control exercises on disc health and on patients with disc herniation suggest that this type of intervention surpasses other exercises (such as strengthening/resistance exercises, cardiovascular, etc.) and other conventional interventions (such as TENS). The treatment plan for patients with disc herniation can have a positive impact on the process of enhancing the reabsorption of herniated disc contents, disc height, disc diffusion rate, and the improvement of radicular symptoms.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
True high intensity laser therapy on lumbar region, sciatic, tibial, and peroneal nerves
The laser scanner, 50 cm from the skin, will target the area from the 12th ribs to the upper iliac crest, 4.2 cm lateral to the spine. The sciatic, tibial, and peroneal nerves will also be irradiated.
High intensity laser therapy
The subject will receive high-intensity laser therapy in a prone position with a cushion under the abdomen and eye protection. The laser scanner, 50 cm from the skin, will target the area from the 12th ribs to the upper iliac crest, 4.2 cm lateral to the spine. The sciatic, tibial, and peroneal nerves will also be irradiated. A GaAlAs laser device will be used, with a power of 1.6 watts and a wavelength of 808nm. The initial dose will be 10 joules/cm², with an increment of 2 joules after every three sessions. The final dose will be 16 joules/cm².
Motor control exercise
Motor control exercise is defined as an exercise to increase control and coordination of the spine and pelvis. Normally, Motor control exercise increases the weak deep trunk muscles, such as transversus abdominis and multifidus, and reduces the overactive large external trunk muscles, such as rectus abdominal and erector spinae muscles. . All subjects participate in a foundational treatment regimen involving motor control exercises: isolated and combined contractions of the transverse abdominis and multifidus muscles in various positions. Contractions will initially be performed up to a maximum of 10 repetitions per movement, with each contraction sustained for a duration of 10 seconds. Commencing from the third week, the subject should be capable of comfortably executing 10 repetitions, sustaining the contraction for 10 seconds, and progressively increasing the intensity.
Deactivated high intensity laser therapy, an audio device will mimic the laser's operational sound
the laser will remain deactivated, and an audio device will generate a simulation of the operational sound of the device. The subject will also participate in the same foundational treatment regimen involving motor control exercises as the intervention group.
Motor control exercise
Motor control exercise is defined as an exercise to increase control and coordination of the spine and pelvis. Normally, Motor control exercise increases the weak deep trunk muscles, such as transversus abdominis and multifidus, and reduces the overactive large external trunk muscles, such as rectus abdominal and erector spinae muscles. . All subjects participate in a foundational treatment regimen involving motor control exercises: isolated and combined contractions of the transverse abdominis and multifidus muscles in various positions. Contractions will initially be performed up to a maximum of 10 repetitions per movement, with each contraction sustained for a duration of 10 seconds. Commencing from the third week, the subject should be capable of comfortably executing 10 repetitions, sustaining the contraction for 10 seconds, and progressively increasing the intensity.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
High intensity laser therapy
The subject will receive high-intensity laser therapy in a prone position with a cushion under the abdomen and eye protection. The laser scanner, 50 cm from the skin, will target the area from the 12th ribs to the upper iliac crest, 4.2 cm lateral to the spine. The sciatic, tibial, and peroneal nerves will also be irradiated. A GaAlAs laser device will be used, with a power of 1.6 watts and a wavelength of 808nm. The initial dose will be 10 joules/cm², with an increment of 2 joules after every three sessions. The final dose will be 16 joules/cm².
Motor control exercise
Motor control exercise is defined as an exercise to increase control and coordination of the spine and pelvis. Normally, Motor control exercise increases the weak deep trunk muscles, such as transversus abdominis and multifidus, and reduces the overactive large external trunk muscles, such as rectus abdominal and erector spinae muscles. . All subjects participate in a foundational treatment regimen involving motor control exercises: isolated and combined contractions of the transverse abdominis and multifidus muscles in various positions. Contractions will initially be performed up to a maximum of 10 repetitions per movement, with each contraction sustained for a duration of 10 seconds. Commencing from the third week, the subject should be capable of comfortably executing 10 repetitions, sustaining the contraction for 10 seconds, and progressively increasing the intensity.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* A minimum of 12 weeks have elapsed since the onset of symptoms. The patient experiences persistent pain or paraesthesia (numbness and/or tingling) in the lower back or both limbs, attributable to the herniation of the lumbar intervertebral disc impinging on the nerve root dermatome
* Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans of the patients reveal either protrusion or extrusion disc herniation.
Exclusion Criteria
* Vertebral and sacroiliac joint dysfunction (Gillette test positive)
* Pregnancy
* History of previous surgery in the area
* Patients with MRI of spinal canal stenosis or spondylolisthesis
* Patients with vascular disorders, cancer and tumors and synovial cysts
* History of physiotherapy for at least the last 12 weeks
* sciatic nerve Contusion
* psychiatric illnesses
* Active trigger point of gluteus minimus muscle (diffuse sciatica-like pain)
25 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Iran University of Medical Sciences
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Seyed Mostafa Teymouri, Msc student
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Iran University of Medical Sciences
Mohammadreza Pourahmadi, Assistant professor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Iran University of Medical Sciences
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences
Tehran, Tehran Province, Iran
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hartvigsen J, Hancock MJ, Kongsted A, Louw Q, Ferreira ML, Genevay S, Hoy D, Karppinen J, Pransky G, Sieper J, Smeets RJ, Underwood M; Lancet Low Back Pain Series Working Group. What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. Lancet. 2018 Jun 9;391(10137):2356-2367. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30480-X. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
Knezevic NN, Candido KD, Vlaeyen JWS, Van Zundert J, Cohen SP. Low back pain. Lancet. 2021 Jul 3;398(10294):78-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00733-9. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
Farfan HF, Cossette JW, Robertson GH, Wells RV, Kraus H. The effects of torsion on the lumbar intervertebral joints: the role of torsion in the production of disc degeneration. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970 Apr;52(3):468-97. No abstract available.
Lundon K, Bolton K. Structure and function of the lumbar intervertebral disk in health, aging, and pathologic conditions. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2001 Jun;31(6):291-303; discussion 304-6. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2001.31.6.291.
Beattie PF. Current understanding of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration: a review with emphasis upon etiology, pathophysiology, and lumbar magnetic resonance imaging findings. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Jun;38(6):329-40. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.2768. Epub 2008 Mar 12.
Kawakami M, Matsumoto T, Kuribayashi K, Tamaki T. mRNA expression of interleukins, phospholipase A2, and nitric oxide synthase in the nerve root and dorsal root ganglion induced by autologous nucleus pulposus in the rat. J Orthop Res. 1999 Nov;17(6):941-6. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100170620.
Wanderman RL, Lamer TJ, Wald JT. Myofascial Inflammation Due to Intervertebral Disc Herniation. Pain Med. 2020 Jun 1;21(6):1295-1297. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa008. No abstract available.
Risbud MV, Shapiro IM. Role of cytokines in intervertebral disc degeneration: pain and disc content. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2014 Jan;10(1):44-56. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2013.160. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
Burke JG, Watson RW, McCormack D, Dowling FE, Walsh MG, Fitzpatrick JM. Intervertebral discs which cause low back pain secrete high levels of proinflammatory mediators. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002 Mar;84(2):196-201. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.84b2.12511.
Olmarker K, Rydevik B, Nordborg C. Autologous nucleus pulposus induces neurophysiologic and histologic changes in porcine cauda equina nerve roots. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Sep 1;18(11):1425-32.
Imamura M, Imamura ST, Kaziyama HH, Targino RA, Hsing WT, de Souza LP, Cutait MM, Fregni F, Camanho GL. Impact of nervous system hyperalgesia on pain, disability, and quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a controlled analysis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Oct 15;59(10):1424-31. doi: 10.1002/art.24120.
Moloney N, Hall T, Doody C. An investigation of somatosensory profiles in work related upper limb disorders: a case-control observational study protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Jan 30;11:22. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-22.
Walsh J, Hall T. Reliability, validity and diagnostic accuracy of palpation of the sciatic, tibial and common peroneal nerves in the examination of low back related leg pain. Man Ther. 2009 Dec;14(6):623-9. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2008.12.007. Epub 2009 Feb 6.
Jepsen JR, Laursen LH, Hagert CG, Kreiner S, Larsen AI. Diagnostic accuracy of the neurological upper limb examination I: inter-rater reproducibility of selected findings and patterns. BMC Neurol. 2006 Feb 16;6:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-6-8.
Hall TM, Elvey RL. Nerve trunk pain: physical diagnosis and treatment. Man Ther. 1999 May;4(2):63-73. doi: 10.1054/math.1999.0172.
Quintner JL, Bove GM. From neuralgia to peripheral neuropathic pain: evolution of a concept. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2001 Jul-Aug;26(4):368-72. doi: 10.1053/rapm.2001.23676. No abstract available.
Fingleton CP, Dempsey L, Smart K, Doody CM. Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability of manual palpation and pressure algometry of the lower limb nerves in asymptomatic subjects. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2014 Feb;37(2):97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.12.006. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
O'Connell GD, Leach JK, Klineberg EO. Tissue Engineering a Biological Repair Strategy for Lumbar Disc Herniation. Biores Open Access. 2015 Nov 1;4(1):431-45. doi: 10.1089/biores.2015.0034. eCollection 2015.
Yang S, Kim W, Kong HH, Do KH, Choi KH. Epidural steroid injection versus conservative treatment for patients with lumbosacral radicular pain: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 24;99(30):e21283. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021283.
Johnson ZI, Schoepflin ZR, Choi H, Shapiro IM, Risbud MV. Disc in flames: Roles of TNF-alpha and IL-1beta in intervertebral disc degeneration. Eur Cell Mater. 2015 Sep 21;30:104-16; discussion 116-7. doi: 10.22203/ecm.v030a08.
Kreiner DS, Hwang SW, Easa JE, Resnick DK, Baisden JL, Bess S, Cho CH, DePalma MJ, Dougherty P 2nd, Fernand R, Ghiselli G, Hanna AS, Lamer T, Lisi AJ, Mazanec DJ, Meagher RJ, Nucci RC, Patel RD, Sembrano JN, Sharma AK, Summers JT, Taleghani CK, Tontz WL Jr, Toton JF; North American Spine Society. An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy. Spine J. 2014 Jan;14(1):180-91. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.003. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, McLean RM, Forciea MA; Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians; Denberg TD, Barry MJ, Boyd C, Chow RD, Fitterman N, Harris RP, Humphrey LL, Vijan S. Noninvasive Treatments for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 4;166(7):514-530. doi: 10.7326/M16-2367. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
Maher CG. Effective physical treatment for chronic low back pain. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004 Jan;35(1):57-64. doi: 10.1016/S0030-5898(03)00088-9.
Alayat MS, Atya AM, Ali MM, Shosha TM. Long-term effect of high-intensity laser therapy in the treatment of patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized blinded placebo-controlled trial. Lasers Med Sci. 2014 May;29(3):1065-73. doi: 10.1007/s10103-013-1472-5. Epub 2013 Nov 2.
Alayat MS, Mohamed AA, Helal OF, Khaled OA. Efficacy of high-intensity laser therapy in the treatment of chronic neck pain: a randomized double-blind placebo-control trial. Lasers Med Sci. 2016 May;31(4):687-94. doi: 10.1007/s10103-016-1910-2. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
Santos Jde O, Oliveira SM, Nobre MR, Aranha AC, Alvarenga MB. A randomised clinical trial of the effect of low-level laser therapy for perineal pain and healing after episiotomy: a pilot study. Midwifery. 2012 Oct;28(5):e653-9. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.07.009. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
Ezzati K, Fekrazad R, Raoufi Z. The Effects of Photobiomodulation Therapy on Post-Surgical Pain. J Lasers Med Sci. 2019 Spring;10(2):79-85. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2019.13. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
Kozanoglu E, Basaran S, Paydas S, Sarpel T. Efficacy of pneumatic compression and low-level laser therapy in the treatment of postmastectomy lymphoedema: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2009 Feb;23(2):117-24. doi: 10.1177/0269215508096173.
Zati A, Valent A. Physical therapy: new technologies in rehabilitation medicine (translated to English). Edizioni Minerva Medica. 2006;2006:162-85.
Alayat MSM, Alshehri MA, Shousha TM, Abdelgalil AA, Alhasan H, Khayyat OK, Al-Attar WS. The effectiveness of high intensity laser therapy in the management of spinal disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2019;32(6):869-884. doi: 10.3233/BMR-181341.
Ackermann G, Hartmann M, Scherer K, Lang EW, Hohenleutner U, Landthaler M, Baumler W. Correlations between light penetration into skin and the therapeutic outcome following laser therapy of port-wine stains. Lasers Med Sci. 2002;17(2):70-8. doi: 10.1007/s101030200013.
Jacobsen HE, Khan AN, Levine ME, Filippi CG, Chahine NO. Severity of intervertebral disc herniation regulates cytokine and chemokine levels in patients with chronic radicular back pain. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2020 Oct;28(10):1341-1350. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2020.06.009. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
Pedersen LM, Schistad E, Jacobsen LM, Roe C, Gjerstad J. Serum levels of the pro-inflammatory interleukins 6 (IL-6) and -8 (IL-8) in patients with lumbar radicular pain due to disc herniation: A 12-month prospective study. Brain Behav Immun. 2015 May;46:132-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2015.01.008. Epub 2015 Jan 31.
de Lima FM, Bjordal JM, Albertini R, Santos FV, Aimbire F. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) attenuates RhoA mRNA expression in the rat bronchi smooth muscle exposed to tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Lasers Med Sci. 2010 Sep;25(5):661-8. doi: 10.1007/s10103-010-0766-0.
de Lima FM, Villaverde AB, Albertini R, Correa JC, Carvalho RL, Munin E, Araujo T, Silva JA, Aimbire F. Dual Effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on the acute lung inflammation induced by intestinal ischemia and reperfusion: Action on anti- and pro-inflammatory cytokines. Lasers Surg Med. 2011 Jul;43(5):410-20. doi: 10.1002/lsm.21053.
Nambi G. Does low level laser therapy has effects on inflammatory biomarkers IL-1beta, IL-6, TNF-alpha, and MMP-13 in osteoarthritis of rat models-a systemic review and meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci. 2021 Apr;36(3):475-484. doi: 10.1007/s10103-020-03124-w. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
Lopes-Martins RAB, Marcos RL, Leal-Junior ECP, Bjordal JM. Low-Level Laser Therapy and World Association for Laser Therapy Dosage Recommendations in Musculoskeletal Disorders and Injuries. Photomed Laser Surg. 2018 Sep;36(9):457-459. doi: 10.1089/pho.2018.4493. No abstract available.
Searle A, Spink M, Ho A, Chuter V. Exercise interventions for the treatment of chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Clin Rehabil. 2015 Dec;29(12):1155-67. doi: 10.1177/0269215515570379. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
Franca FJR, Callegari B, Ramos LAV, Burke TN, Magalhaes MO, Comachio J, CarvalhoSilva APMC, Almeida GPL, Marques AP. Motor Control Training Compared With Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Disc Herniation With Associated Radiculopathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Mar;98(3):207-214. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001048.
Owen PJ, Miller CT, Rantalainen T, Simson KJ, Connell D, Hahne AJ, Trudel G, Ford JJ, Belavy DL. Exercise for the intervertebral disc: a 6-month randomised controlled trial in chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2020 Aug;29(8):1887-1899. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06379-7. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
Kolu E, Buyukavci R, Akturk S, Eren F, Ersoy Y. Comparison of high-intensity laser therapy and combination of transcutaneous nerve stimulation and ultrasound treatment in patients with chronic lumbar radiculopathy: A randomized single-blind study. Pak J Med Sci. 2018 May-Jun;34(3):530-534. doi: 10.12669/pjms.343.14345.
Chen L, Liu D, Zou L, Huang J, Chen J, Zou Y, Lai J, Chen J, Li H, Liu G. Efficacy of high intensity laser therapy in treatment of patients with lumbar disc protrusion: A randomized controlled trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2018 Feb 6;31(1):191-196. doi: 10.3233/BMR-170793.
Boyraz I, Yildiz A, Koc B, Sarman H. Comparison of high-intensity laser therapy and ultrasound treatment in the patients with lumbar discopathy. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:304328. doi: 10.1155/2015/304328. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
de Carvalho ME, de Carvalho RM Jr, Marques AP, de Carvalho Lucio LM, de Oliveira AC, Neto OP, Villaverde AB, de Lima CJ. Low intensity laser and LED therapies associated with lateral decubitus position and flexion exercises of the lower limbs in patients with lumbar disk herniation: clinical randomized trial. Lasers Med Sci. 2016 Sep;31(7):1455-63. doi: 10.1007/s10103-016-2009-5. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
Fiore P, Panza F, Cassatella G, Russo A, Frisardi V, Solfrizzi V, Ranieri M, Di Teo L, Santamato A. Short-term effects of high-intensity laser therapy versus ultrasound therapy in the treatment of low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2011 Sep;47(3):367-73. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
Abdelbasset WK, Nambi G, Alsubaie SF, Abodonya AM, Saleh AK, Ataalla NN, Ibrahim AA, Tantawy SA, Kamel DM, Verma A, Moawd SA. A Randomized Comparative Study between High-Intensity and Low-Level Laser Therapy in the Treatment of Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020 Oct 28;2020:1350281. doi: 10.1155/2020/1350281. eCollection 2020.
Ay S, Dogan SK, Evcik D. Is low-level laser therapy effective in acute or chronic low back pain? Clin Rheumatol. 2010 Aug;29(8):905-10. doi: 10.1007/s10067-010-1460-0. Epub 2010 Apr 23.
Gonzalez-Lima F, editor Dose-response effects of low-level light therapy on brain and muscle. Proceeding of the 13th Annual International Conference on Dose-Response Texas: The University of Texas at Austin; 2014.
Conte P, Santamato A, Fiore P, Lopresto A, Mazzaracchio M. Treatment of chronic low back pain: back school versus Hilterapia. Energy for health. 2009;3(3):10.
Choi HW, Lee J, Lee S, Choi J, Lee K, Kim BK, Kim GJ. Effects of high intensity laser therapy on pain and function of patients with chronic back pain. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Jun;29(6):1079-1081. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.1079. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
Zahra ALT, Alhabeel M. Laser Dental Treatment Techniques. 2019. p. 2-16.
World Association of Laser Therapy (WALT). Standards for the design and conduct of systematic reviews with low-level laser therapy for musculoskeletal pain and disorders. Photomed Laser Surg. 2006 Dec;24(6):759-60. doi: 10.1089/pho.2006.24.759. No abstract available.
Govind J. Lumbar radicular pain. Aust Fam Physician. 2004 Jun;33(6):409-12.
Alain Y. Belanger therapeutic electrophysical agents: evidence behind practice. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2015.
Krusen FH, Kottke FJ, Ellwood PM. Handbook of physical medicine and rehabilitation: WB Saunders Company; 1971.
Williams ACC, Craig KD. Updating the definition of pain. Pain. 2016 Nov;157(11):2420-2423. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000613. No abstract available.
Leonardi M, Bickenbach J, Ustun TB, Kostanjsek N, Chatterji S; MHADIE Consortium. The definition of disability: what is in a name? Lancet. 2006 Oct 7;368(9543):1219-21. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69498-1. No abstract available.
Mousavi SJ, Parnianpour M, Mehdian H, Montazeri A, Mobini B. The Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: translation and validation studies of the Iranian versions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Jun 15;31(14):E454-9. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000222141.61424.f7.
Ylinen J. Pressure algometry. Aust J Physiother. 2007;53(3):207. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(07)70032-6. No abstract available.
Vucinic N, Eric M, Tomasevic-Todorovic S, Milekic B. Application of algometry in patients with cervical and lumbar radiculopathy. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2018;31(3):567-575. doi: 10.3233/BMR-170965.
Gajdosik RL, Bohannon RW. Clinical measurement of range of motion. Review of goniometry emphasizing reliability and validity. Phys Ther. 1987 Dec;67(12):1867-72. doi: 10.1093/ptj/67.12.1867.
Tousignant M, Poulin L, Marchand S, Viau A, Place C. The Modified-Modified Schober Test for range of motion assessment of lumbar flexion in patients with low back pain: a study of criterion validity, intra- and inter-rater reliability and minimum metrically detectable change. Disabil Rehabil. 2005 May 20;27(10):553-9. doi: 10.1080/09638280400018411.
Eloqayli H. Clinical Decision-Making in Chronic Spine Pain: Dilemma of Image-Based Diagnosis of Degenerative Spine and Generation Mechanisms for Nociceptive, Radicular, and Referred Pain. Biomed Res Int. 2018 Dec 17;2018:8793843. doi: 10.1155/2018/8793843. eCollection 2018.
Taradaj J, Rajfur K, Shay B, Rajfur J, Ptaszkowski K, Walewicz K, Dymarek R, Sopel M, Rosinczuk J. Photobiomodulation using high- or low-level laser irradiations in patients with lumbar disc degenerative changes: disappointing outcomes and remarks. Clin Interv Aging. 2018 Aug 21;13:1445-1455. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S168094. eCollection 2018.
Yilmaz M, Tarakci D, Tarakci E. Comparison of high-intensity laser therapy and combination of ultrasound treatment and transcutaneous nerve stimulation on cervical pain associated with cervical disc herniation: A randomized trial. Complement Ther Med. 2020 Mar;49:102295. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2019.102295. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
Dayanir IO, Birinci T, Kaya Mutlu E, Akcetin MA, Akdemir AO. Comparison of Three Manual Therapy Techniques as Trigger Point Therapy for Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial. J Altern Complement Med. 2020 Apr;26(4):291-299. doi: 10.1089/acm.2019.0435. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
Ostelo RW, Deyo RA, Stratford P, Waddell G, Croft P, Von Korff M, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jan 1;33(1):90-4. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e3a10.
Koumantakis GA, Watson PJ, Oldham JA. Trunk muscle stabilization training plus general exercise versus general exercise only: randomized controlled trial of patients with recurrent low back pain. Phys Ther. 2005 Mar;85(3):209-25.
Roland M, Waddell G, Klaber-Moffett J, Burton A, Main C. The back book: the best way to deal with back pain: TSO; 2002.
Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Nov 15;25(22):2940-52; discussion 2952. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017.
Yalfani A, Raeisi Z, Koumasian Z. Effects of eight-week water versus mat pilates on female patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: Double-blind randomized clinical trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2020 Oct;24(4):70-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
Sawilowsky SS. New effect size rules of thumb. Journal of modern applied statistical methods. 2009;8(2):26.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRCT20220410054486N1
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
IR.IUMS.REC.1401.089
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.