The Effects of MLS LASER Therapy in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
NCT ID: NCT05870826
Last Updated: 2023-05-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-03-21
2023-03-21
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of this study is to assess the effects of a multi-wave locked system laser therapy in patient with non-specif low back pain when administered alone.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Spinal Manipulation With Laser Therapy Versus Dry Needling in Chronic Lower Backache
NCT05853926
Study of Low Level Laser Therapy to Treat Low Back Pain
NCT01835756
Effects of Laser Therapy and Exercise in Participants With Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT04287725
Effect of Low-level Laser Therapy Versus Shock Wave Therapy on Pain and Function in Patients With Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain
NCT06487338
Low Level LASER Therapy With and Without Proprioceptive Stimulation Among Discogenic Lumbar Radiculopathy Patients
NCT05953727
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain are characterized by pain intensity sometimes disabling, a reduction in lumbar range of motion (ROM) and the frequent absence of flexion-relaxation phenomenon (FRP). Both high-power and low-power laser therapy, especially when included in a multidimensional rehabilitation plan, seems effective in improving both pain and function of affected patients. MLS (Multiwave Locked System) laser therapy is an innovative high-power technology characterized by the combined and synchronized emission of laser light at two wavelengths (a continuous emission with a wavelength wavelength of 808 nm and a pulsed emission at 905 nm) and its efficacy in the treatment of chronic nonspecific low back pain is still unknown.
This work aims to study the effects of MSL laser therapy on pain, disability disability, lumbar ROM and muscle activity in a homogeneous group of patients with from chronic nonspecific low back pain. Although the literature shows that the combination of exercise with laser therapy yields better results in terms of both pain reduction and functional recovery, in this study we chose not to use any combination of treatments, in order to evaluate the effectiveness of MLS laser therapy alone in the treatment of chronic nonspecific low back pain.
To isolate the specific results of MLS laser therapy, it is intended to compare it with a placebo, represented by a device apparently identical in morphology and behavior to that delivering the laser and emitting visible light of similar appearance, by means of a clinical trial double-blind prospective randomized controlled trial. The double-blind design is adhered to because the type of laser therapy employed with the protocol followed, despite the effects tissue biology highlighted in the literature, is not able to make the patient feel any heat sensation during the session. 31 This is the first study in the literature aimed at analyzing the possible effects determined by the use of MLS laser therapy in chronic nonspecific low back pain: this investigation is conducted with an integrated methodology, using standardized and validated measures for pain intensity and disability, combined with kinematic and electromyography of high technological value.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Sham laser therapy
The control group (PL group) is subjected to a laser sham (placebo), employing a device identical to the one under investigation but lacking the laser emission capability, and the same mode of administration in terms of time and place. Both the sham laser and the test device emit visible light of the same color and are not distinguishable in any way.
Sham laser therapy
Sham laser therapy
Laser therapy
The MLS group receives MLS synchronized diode laser therapy emitted by the MLS M8 robotic device (ASA, Italy).
MLS M8 (ASA, Arcugnano, Italy), a Class IV (high-power) laser approved by the Food Drug Administration (FDA) and CE certified, characterized by a combined, synchronized two-wavelength (CPW) emission: a continuous emission with a wavelength of 808 nm and a pulsed emission at 905 nm.
The duration of each session is 5 min 45 sec.seconds, delivering a total energy of 1500 J and an energy dose of 5 J/cm2, for an area of 300 cm2.
The robotic device is placed in the lumbar area, oriented on the muscles erector spinae and quadratus lumborum. The target area set on the device is "lumbar area." The parameters set on the device are "Synchronized Emission of Continuous Pulsed Wave (CPW)," "intensity of 100%," "time of 5 minutes and 45 seconds," and "area of 1x300 cm2."
Multiwave locked system laser therapy
High intensity laser therapy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Multiwave locked system laser therapy
High intensity laser therapy
Sham laser therapy
Sham laser therapy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Lack of effectivness of previous conservative therapies for low back pain
* Body mass index \< 30
* Preserved cognitive ability to fully understand and observe indications received by medical personnel
* Ability to understand and give an informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Spinal hernia
* spondylolisthesis
* Spinal infections
* Severe spine deformities
* Neural diseases
* Rheumatic diseases
* Diabetes
* Psychiatric diseases
* Vascular diseases
* Cancer
* Infectious diseases
* Kidney stones
* Skin abrasion
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding
* Recent injuries
* Known sensibility to Laser therapy
* Epilepsy
* Anticoagulant therapy
* Pacemaker
* hemorrhagic diathesis
* Photosensitizing drugs
* Kown Photosensibility
* Low back Tattoos
* Steroid injections in the previous 3 weeks
* Antinflammatory or pain drugs
* HIV positive
* Neuro-stimulation implanted systems
* Tissue with ischemia in the low back
20 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mariagrazia Benedetti
Head of the Unit of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Maria Grazia Benedetti
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
IRCCS-Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Bologna, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
0012596
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.