Collaboration Oriented Approach to Controlling High Blood Pressure
NCT ID: NCT06124716
Last Updated: 2025-04-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
550 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-01-12
2026-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A COmmunity and Tech-Based ApproaCh for Hypertension Self-MANagement
NCT03724487
Telehealth Intervention for Improved Blood Pressure Control With Targeted Incentives
NCT04075045
Telemonitoring and E-Coaching in Hypertension
NCT05660226
Interactive Web Program and Health Coaching for Prehypertensive Adults
NCT02637063
Comparing Hypertension Remote Monitoring Evaluation Redesign
NCT06113458
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Hypertension rarely occurs alone; providing clinical decision support, care planning, and self-management support in the context of multiple chronic illnesses is required.
The study team will address patient-centered needs by scaling our implemented, patient-facing CDS for eCare Planning, Collaboration Oriented Approach to Controlling High blood pressure (COACH) to 3 sites and testing whether it reduces blood pressure and risk of heart attack and stroke. To do so, we embed a diverse patient perspective into a robust, feasible, and effective CDS implementation and evaluation process by 1) capturing patient input throughout the CDS lifecycle; 2) adapting the COACH CDS to patient preferences, values, and goals; and 3) disseminating the tested FHIR-based (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources) patient-facing application into organizations that combines blood pressure control with relevant risk scores into an eCare Plan application and framework and implementing these patient-centered approaches in feasible, context-responsive, and effective ways. The investigators address scalability by helping organizations advance their use of patient-generated health data and patient-reported outcomes using standard implementation frameworks while producing CDS artifacts and implementation guides that can be leveraged to increase adoption beyond the work of this proposal. For interoperability, we use a standard-based, structured process that re-uses concept and value sets whenever possible while using robust techniques to develop new sets and make them available for future innovators.
To complete these goals, the study investigators leverage previous work in building standardized HBP value sets, logic, and a patient-facing FHIR tool. In this work, we have engaged in several collaborations, most notably with the CDS Connect Community, where we will upload all artifacts, but also with other AHRQ digital health efforts and with other large collaboratives, including the ACC/AHA and JNC8 guideline developers, the HL7 CPG-on-FHIR, and the eCare Planning project from NIDDK and AHRQ. The study investigators will use two frameworks to evaluate the implementation. First, adaptation in implementation science is both common and may be required for success; we explore the ways in which the 5 rights-the right information to the right person in the right intervention format through the right channel at the right time in workflow-can be adapted for key organizational needs while retaining fidelity to the goals. In addition, we consider a framework that combines usability with effectiveness for complex conditions by exploring concepts related to appropriate simplicity, prioritization, summarization, adjudication, and actionability to enhance CDS effectiveness for patient needs.
Thus, the study's specific aims are:
1. To refine and implement a patient-facing, adaptable Blood Pressure Control CDS system in 3 diverse settings, using implementation science and patient engagement to maximize effectiveness.
2. To evaluate the effectiveness of the application at lowering blood pressure employing a mixed methods design, with qualitative inquiry nested within a randomized controlled trial, secondary RE-AIM and social cognitive theory outcomes, and qualitative evaluation of implementations across sites.
3. To develop robust, sharable, interoperable mechanisms, leveraging collaborations and synthesis of the implementation experience to aid in further dissemination and implementations of patient-facing CDS.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Enhanced COACH
Enhanced blood pressure management recommendations that use cognitive and behavioral science to increase the likelihood of self-management goal setting to lower blood pressure. The CDS tool allows participant access to BP visualizations, reminders, and affectively tailored messaging about blood pressure management.
Enhanced COACH CDS Tool
CDS tool with features to promote high blood pressure management
Usual Care COACH
Equivalent of usual care delivered through the CDS tool: Blood pressure management with basic information, reduced reminders, and no affective alerts.
Usual Care COACH CDS Tool
CDS tool with limited features to promote high blood pressure management
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Enhanced COACH CDS Tool
CDS tool with features to promote high blood pressure management
Usual Care COACH CDS Tool
CDS tool with limited features to promote high blood pressure management
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient receives care at a participating primary care clinic and has been seen in the last year
* Patient has high BP, defined as an average of 4 BPs \> 140 systolic or \> 90 diastolic (clinic) or \> 135 OR \> 85 (home)
* Patient is enrolled in online health portal
* Patient can communicate in English
* Patient has been recommended by their physician who thinks the patient would benefit from a home blood pressure monitoring program.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient who, in the opinion of the primary care clinician, has severe cognitive impairment
* Patient is on hospice care and/or has a life expectancy of less than 2 years
* Patient has end stage renal disease
* Patient for whom tight blood pressure control presents a greater risk, such as those with a history of adverse events from hypertension treatment (falls, dizziness, electrolyte disturbances, hypotension, active heart failure)
* Patient has any other disease or disorder that in the opinion of the investigator or the patient's primary care clinician, could put participants at risk and affect trial results, or hinder participation will exclude them from participating
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Missouri-Columbia
OTHER
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
OTHER
Oregon Health and Science University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
David Dorr
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David Dorr, MD, MS, FACMI, FAMIA
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Oregon Health and Science University
Richelle Koopman, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Missouri-Columbia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Missouri-Columbia
Columbia, Missouri, United States
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, United States
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Dorr DA, Montgomery E, Ghumman AJ, Michaels L, Rolbiecki A, Canfield S, Shaffer V, Johnson B, Lockwood M, Ghosh P, Martinez W, Koopman R; COACH Consortium. Study protocol: Collaboration Oriented Approach to Controlling High blood pressure (COACH) in adults - a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 8;14(7):e085898. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085898.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.