Working With Veterans Organizations to Improve Blood Pressure
NCT ID: NCT00571038
Last Updated: 2015-04-24
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
404 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-02-29
2010-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study to Lower Veterans BP: Patient/Physician Intervention
NCT00105716
A Behavioral Intervention To Improve Hypertension Control In Veterans
NCT00286754
Veteran Preference For Group Visits and Its Effect on Hypertension Outcomes
NCT00439816
Improving Practice Patterns for the Treatment of Hypertension
NCT00265044
Conquering Hypertension in Vietnam: Solutions at Grassroots Level
NCT03590691
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
BACKGROUND/RATIONALE Despite consensus that effective hypertension treatment reduces morbidity and mortality, many patients in the United States continue to have suboptimal blood pressure control. Even with the provider resources and motivated patients inherent in a randomized clinical trial, over a third of patients participating in the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) were not at their goal blood pressure of 140/90 after five years. Similarly, within the Veterans Integrated Service Network (VISN) 12 we have found that as many as 30% of patients with hypertension are above the target BP of 140/90, despite routine physician reminders to patients who are above these goals. Moreover, preliminary results of an internally funded randomized trial suggest minimal impact of further physician-focused interventions to reduce patients' blood pressure.
OBJECTIVES We will have two primary objectives. First, because the intervention proposed is novel, we believe we need to demonstrate its efficacy in a methodologically rigorous fashion. Specifically we plan to demonstrate that veterans participating in a peer support intervention will have improved blood pressure control, knowledge of blood pressure treatment, both generally and for themselves, and a more active stance as patients.
Second, we will carefully examine the process by which our intervention achieves these goals, including examining such key structural variables as the frequency of peer support meetings, attendance of participants at these meetings, and use of healthcare professional support by the group leaders. As part of this second objective, we also seek to understand the fidelity with which the peer leaders are to deliver the intervention, and the satisfaction of both support group participants and leaders with the intervention.
METHODS There are three primary activities in the present project.
First, academicians from the Clement J. Zablocki VA Medical Center (VAMC) are working with the Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) and other community groups to develop a community-academic partnership that follows the principles of community-based participatory research. This key activity is underway and will continue beyond the present period of funding. Second, the centerpiece of the present grant is a cluster randomized clinical trial (RCT) of the use of peer-led support groups to improve BP control in patients with hypertension. Fifty posts drawn from the VFW, American Legion, Vietnam Veterans Association, and National Association of Black Veterans will be randomly assigned to receive professionally delivered education regarding hypertension or to a peer support intervention. The third activity is an evaluation of the processes involved in delivering the peer support intervention that will allow for successful replication, or to provide insight into why the expected improvement in BP control did not occur.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Peer Led
Post provided with blood pressure cuffs, pedometers and scale. Two post members trained as peer leaders who encourage post members to take positive steps to improve BP. Peer leader training involves 20 hours of training over 12 months, telephone/email access to clinical experts and educational materials to share with post members.
Peer Led
Post provided with blood pressure cuffs, pedometers and scale. Two post members trained as peer leaders who encourage post members to take positive steps to improve BP. Peer leader training involves 20 hours of training over 12 months, telephone/email access to clinical experts and educational materials to share with post members.
Seminar
Post provided with blood pressure cuffs, pedometers and scale. Post members, including study participants invited to didactic sessions on cardiovascular health.
Seminar
Post provided with blood pressure cuffs, pedometers and scale. Post members, including study participants invited to didactic sessions on cardiovascular health.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Peer Led
Post provided with blood pressure cuffs, pedometers and scale. Two post members trained as peer leaders who encourage post members to take positive steps to improve BP. Peer leader training involves 20 hours of training over 12 months, telephone/email access to clinical experts and educational materials to share with post members.
Seminar
Post provided with blood pressure cuffs, pedometers and scale. Post members, including study participants invited to didactic sessions on cardiovascular health.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Hypertension as established by one of: a) Average systolic blood pressure (SBP) greater than 140 or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) greater than 90 at two baseline visits; b) SBP greater than 130 or DBP greater than 90 at two baseline visits, plus patient report of diabetes mellitus and use of a hypoglycemic agent at the baseline visit; or c) self-reported hypertension plus self-reported current treatment with at least one antihypertensive drug at baseline visit.
3. Willingness to sign informed consent document.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Inability to communicate with other post members because of language barrier or physical limitation (e.g., prior stroke).
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medical College of Wisconsin
OTHER
Veterans of Foreign Wars USA
OTHER
Vietnam Veterans of America
UNKNOWN
National Association of Black Veterans
UNKNOWN
Korea Veterans of America, Inc.
OTHER
Disabled American Veterans
OTHER
AmVETS
UNKNOWN
Jewish War Veterans of the United States of America
OTHER
The American Legion Department of Wisconsin
OTHER
Wisconsin Elks Association (a branch of The Benevolent and Protective order of Elks of the United States of America)
UNKNOWN
US Department of Veterans Affairs
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jeffrey C Whittle, MD MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Clement J. Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Clement J. Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rosenwald K, Ertl K, Fletcher KE, Whittle J. Patterns of arthritis medication use in a community sample. J Prim Care Community Health. 2012 Oct 1;3(4):272-7. doi: 10.1177/2150131912442388. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
Patterson L, Morzinski J, Ertl K, Wurm C, Hayes A, Whittle J. Engaging community-based veterans' organizations in health promotion programs. Fam Community Health. 2011 Oct-Dec;34(4):311-8. doi: 10.1097/FCH.0b013e31822b5425.
Whittle J, Fletcher KE, Morzinski J, Ertl K, Patterson L, Jensen W, Schapira MM. Ethical challenges in a randomized controlled trial of peer education among veterans service organizations. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010 Dec;5(4):43-51. doi: 10.1525/jer.2010.5.4.43.
Shirk J, Fletcher K, Patterson L, Grippen A, Eastwood D, Whittle JC. Peer leader characteristics do not predict their ability to deliver a peer support intervention. [Abstract]. Journal of general internal medicine. 2010 Jul 1; 25(Supple 3):S347.
Hayes A, Morzinski J, Ertl K, Wurm C, Patterson L, Wilke N, Whittle J. Preliminary description of the feasibility of using peer leaders to encourage hypertension self-management. WMJ. 2010 Apr;109(2):85-90.
Whittle J, Schapira MM, Fletcher KE, Hayes A, Morzinski J, Laud P, Eastwood D, Ertl K, Patterson L, Mosack KE. A randomized trial of peer-delivered self-management support for hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 2014 Nov;27(11):1416-23. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpu058. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
Whittle JC, Hayes A, Eastwood D, Morzinski J, Ertl K, Wurm C. Effect on health behaviors of a health promotion intervention delivered through veterans service organizations. [Abstract]. Journal of general internal medicine. 2010 Jul 1; 25(Supple 3):S264.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Click here for more information about this study: Working with Veterans Organizations to Improve Blood Pressure
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IAB 06-086
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.