UNN-RADS Scale for Diagnosing Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With History of Thyroid Cancer
NCT ID: NCT06124469
Last Updated: 2023-11-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
99 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-03-15
2023-11-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Accuracy of One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA) in Diagnosis of Lymph Node Metastases of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
NCT03889769
Ultrasound-Guided Needle Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Malignant Cervical Lymphadenopathies
NCT01384357
Elastography and FNAC in Thyroid Nodule
NCT05734326
Factors Influencing Inadequacy in Rapid Onsite Evaluation of Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) Samples of Thyroid Nodules
NCT06984991
Application of Ultrasonic Gray-scale Ratio in Differentiating Benign From Malignant Thyroid Nodules.
NCT03700762
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
UNN-RADS 1 y 2 and UNN-RADS 3, 4 and 5 were grouped for analysis purpose. Diagnostic performance of UNN-RADS scale were assessed in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratios (+LR), negative likelihood ratios (-LR) and accuracy, as well as with a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Benign lymph nodes
Categories UNN-RADS 1 and 2 (test negative)
US-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA)
This study enrolled consecutive patients in follow-up for DTC history who underwent US-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) of the LNs for suspicious metastatic cervical
Metastatic lymph nodes
Categories UNN-RADS 3, 4, and 5 (test positive).
US-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA)
This study enrolled consecutive patients in follow-up for DTC history who underwent US-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) of the LNs for suspicious metastatic cervical
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
US-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA)
This study enrolled consecutive patients in follow-up for DTC history who underwent US-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) of the LNs for suspicious metastatic cervical
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
64 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hilda Elizabeth Macías Cervantes
PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hilda Maciaqs, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Unidad Medica de Alta Especialidad No. 1, Bajío
León, Guanajuato, Mexico
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ryu KH, Lee KH, Ryu J, Baek HJ, Kim SJ, Jung HK, Kim SM. Cervical Lymph Node Imaging Reporting and Data System for Ultrasound of Cervical Lymphadenopathy: A Pilot Study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Jun;206(6):1286-91. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.15381. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
Ahuja AT, Ying M. Sonographic evaluation of cervical lymph nodes. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 May;184(5):1691-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.184.5.01841691.
Prativadi R, Dahiya N, Kamaya A, Bhatt S. Chapter 5 Ultrasound Characteristics of Benign vs Malignant Cervical Lymph Nodes. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2017 Oct;38(5):506-515. doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 May 20.
Ni X, Xu S, Zhan W, Zhou W. Ultrasonographic features of cervical lymph node metastases from medullary thyroid cancer: a retrospective study. BMC Med Imaging. 2022 Aug 29;22(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12880-022-00882-7.
Meyer JE, Steffen A, Bienemann M, Hedderich J, Schulz U, Laudien M, Quetz J, Wollenberg B. Evaluation and development of a predictive model for ultrasound-guided investigation of neck metastases. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Jan;269(1):315-20. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1611-1. Epub 2011 May 6.
Sarda Inman ED, Valdez Rojas AM. Ultrasound Neck Node Reporting and Data System (UNN-RADS) for lymphadenopathy: A structured report. J Mex Fed Radiol Imaging 2022;3:151-163.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
3
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.