A Pragmatic Feasibility Trial to Promote Student Perspective-Taking on Client Physical Activity: A Collaborative Project

NCT ID: NCT06123507

Last Updated: 2023-11-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

163 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-02-19

Study Completion Date

2019-12-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This mixed-methods parallel two-arm trial assessed the feasibility, appropriateness, and acceptability of a theoretically-informed intervention designed to improve perspective-taking skills in preparation for a future definitive randomized control trial. Using a 1:1 allocation ratio, student participants (N = 163) in Respiratory, Physical, and Occupational Therapy; Nurse Practitioner; and Kinesiology programs at a Canadian university were randomly assigned to full or partial intervention conditions. Full intervention participants completed an online workshop on perspective-taking and practiced perspective-taking prior to an in-lab 10-minute dialogue with a trained client-actor (masked to condition) about the actor's physical inactivity. Partial intervention participants received the workshop after the dialogue, and were instructed to be aware and mindful of the approach that they took to seek understanding. To be considered feasible, outcomes needed to meet or surpass our criteria (e.g., within-course recruitment: 85-95% of a course when embedded within a course, 5-10% when not embedded). Feasibility and appropriateness were assessed by comparing recruitment rates, protocol, and psychometric outcomes to criteria. Acceptability was assessed by analyzing exit interviews. Recruitment rates, protocol, and psychometric outcomes largely met criteria, and the study was acceptable.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Communication

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This randomized mixed-methods parallel two-arm feasibility trial used a 1:1 allocation ratio in Excel. This study's primary purpose was to assess the feasibility, appropriateness, and acceptability of a randomized pilot trial where some health-care students received a Full educational Intervention on perspective-taking and others received a Partial Intervention.
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Client-actors were masked to condition. Investigators were masked while determining participants' perceptual understanding scores (i.e., how accurate participants were at inferring the client-actor's thoughts and feelings). In-lab research assistants were not masked to condition.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Full educational intervention condition

The Full intervention condition included a perspective-taking workshop plus independent practice and video-feedback

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Student practitioner perspective-taking intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This intervention compares the outcomes where some learn about and practice perspective-taking and others do not. All participants received at least a partial intervention through getting video-feedback on their dialogue with a client actor.

Partial intervention condition

The Partial intervention condition involved video-feedback alone. In this condition, participants were provided with a link to the perspective-taking workshop after the study was complete.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Student practitioner perspective-taking intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This intervention compares the outcomes where some learn about and practice perspective-taking and others do not. All participants received at least a partial intervention through getting video-feedback on their dialogue with a client actor.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Student practitioner perspective-taking intervention

This intervention compares the outcomes where some learn about and practice perspective-taking and others do not. All participants received at least a partial intervention through getting video-feedback on their dialogue with a client actor.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Must be a student at the University of Manitoba
* Must have completed course content on behaviour change communication

Exclusion Criteria

* Full intervention participants were excluded from descriptive statistics calculations if they partially completed the workshop or did not complete all phases due to client-actor availability
* Data from participating in additional study sessions were excluded
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Manitoba

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Shaelyn Strachan, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Manitoba

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Manitoba

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hoplock LB, Lobchuk MM, Strachan SM, Halas G, Olfert C, Webber S, Parsons JL. A randomized pragmatic feasibility trial to promote student perspective-taking on client physical activity level: a collaborative project. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Sep 28;10(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01547-8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39342378 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

48798

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

322464

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

E2018:008

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Stand & Move at Work
NCT02566317 COMPLETED NA
The Psychology of Physical Activity
NCT02538068 COMPLETED NA