Trial Outcomes & Findings for Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine for Pelvic Organ Prolapse (NCT NCT06120530)

NCT ID: NCT06120530

Last Updated: 2025-04-20

Results Overview

Patient pain will be measured by means of a numeric rating scale (scale from 0-10 with lower numbers indicating less pain and higher numbers indicating more pain) at 4 hours after surgical pelvic organ prolapse repair

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE4

Target enrollment

91 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

4 hours

Results posted on

2025-04-20

Participant Flow

All participants underwent pelvic organ prolapse surgery at one academic medical center from August 16, 2023, to March 14, 2024.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine
This arm received 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine without epinephrine via intraperitoneal lavage throughout the pelvis immediately prior to loss of peritoneal access.
Placebo
This arm received 30 mL of placebo (saline) via intraperitoneal lavage throughout the pelvis immediately prior to loss of peritoneal access.
Overall Study
STARTED
44
47
Overall Study
COMPLETED
44
47
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine
n=44 Participants
This arm received 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine without epinephrine via intraperitoneal lavage throughout the pelvis immediately prior to loss of peritoneal access.
Placebo
n=47 Participants
This arm received 30 mL of placebo (saline) via intraperitoneal lavage throughout the pelvis immediately prior to loss of peritoneal access.
Total
n=91 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
57.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3 • n=93 Participants
57.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7 • n=4 Participants
57.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.0 • n=27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
44 Participants
n=93 Participants
47 Participants
n=4 Participants
91 Participants
n=27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
2 Participants
n=27 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
43 Participants
n=93 Participants
46 Participants
n=4 Participants
89 Participants
n=27 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
3 Participants
n=27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
44 Participants
n=93 Participants
44 Participants
n=4 Participants
88 Participants
n=27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
BMI
29.0 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.68 • n=93 Participants
28.7 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.25 • n=4 Participants
28.9 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.47 • n=27 Participants
Smoking status
Current
5 Participants
n=93 Participants
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
11 Participants
n=27 Participants
Smoking status
Former
11 Participants
n=93 Participants
8 Participants
n=4 Participants
19 Participants
n=27 Participants
Smoking status
Never
28 Participants
n=93 Participants
33 Participants
n=4 Participants
61 Participants
n=27 Participants
Menopausal status
Postmenopausal
28 Participants
n=93 Participants
30 Participants
n=4 Participants
58 Participants
n=27 Participants
Menopausal status
Premenopausal
16 Participants
n=93 Participants
17 Participants
n=4 Participants
33 Participants
n=27 Participants
Primary surgical intervention
Uterosacral ligament suspension
14 Participants
n=93 Participants
16 Participants
n=4 Participants
30 Participants
n=27 Participants
Primary surgical intervention
Sacrocolpopexy
30 Participants
n=93 Participants
31 Participants
n=4 Participants
61 Participants
n=27 Participants
Concomitant surgeries
Vaginal hysterectomy
15 Participants
n=93 Participants
15 Participants
n=4 Participants
30 Participants
n=27 Participants
Concomitant surgeries
Laparoscopic hysterectomy
5 Participants
n=93 Participants
8 Participants
n=4 Participants
13 Participants
n=27 Participants
Concomitant surgeries
Robotic assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy
13 Participants
n=93 Participants
11 Participants
n=4 Participants
24 Participants
n=27 Participants
Concomitant surgeries
Salpingectomy
15 Participants
n=93 Participants
18 Participants
n=4 Participants
33 Participants
n=27 Participants
Concomitant surgeries
Salpingo-oophorectomy
17 Participants
n=93 Participants
18 Participants
n=4 Participants
35 Participants
n=27 Participants
Concomitant surgeries
Midurethral sling
25 Participants
n=93 Participants
34 Participants
n=4 Participants
59 Participants
n=27 Participants
Concomitant surgeries
Urethral bulking
3 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
3 Participants
n=27 Participants
Concomitant surgeries
Anterior colporrhaphy
10 Participants
n=93 Participants
9 Participants
n=4 Participants
19 Participants
n=27 Participants
Concomitant surgeries
Posterior colporrhaphy
30 Participants
n=93 Participants
34 Participants
n=4 Participants
64 Participants
n=27 Participants
Concomitant surgeries
Posterior vaginal mesh placement
9 Participants
n=93 Participants
11 Participants
n=4 Participants
20 Participants
n=27 Participants
Concomitant surgeries
Enterocele repair
29 Participants
n=93 Participants
33 Participants
n=4 Participants
62 Participants
n=27 Participants
Concomitant surgeries
Cystoscopy
44 Participants
n=93 Participants
47 Participants
n=4 Participants
91 Participants
n=27 Participants
Concomitant surgeries
Suprapubic catheter
15 Participants
n=93 Participants
18 Participants
n=4 Participants
33 Participants
n=27 Participants
Concomitant surgeries
Other
6 Participants
n=93 Participants
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
11 Participants
n=27 Participants
Stage of prolapse
Stage 1
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
2 Participants
n=27 Participants
Stage of prolapse
Stage 2
19 Participants
n=93 Participants
19 Participants
n=4 Participants
38 Participants
n=27 Participants
Stage of prolapse
Stage 3
23 Participants
n=93 Participants
21 Participants
n=4 Participants
44 Participants
n=27 Participants
Stage of prolapse
Stage 4
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
7 Participants
n=27 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 4 hours

Patient pain will be measured by means of a numeric rating scale (scale from 0-10 with lower numbers indicating less pain and higher numbers indicating more pain) at 4 hours after surgical pelvic organ prolapse repair

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine
n=44 Participants
This arm received 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine without epinephrine via intraperitoneal lavage throughout the pelvis immediately prior to loss of peritoneal access.
Placebo
n=47 Participants
This arm received 30 mL of placebo (saline) via intraperitoneal lavage throughout the pelvis immediately prior to loss of peritoneal access.
Pain Score at 4 Hours
3.16 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.68
3.77 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.52

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 8 hours, 12 hours and 24 hours

Pain scores as determined by numeric rating scale (scale from 0-10 with lower numbers indicating less pain and higher numbers indicating more pain) at approximately 8, 12 and 24 hours

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine
n=44 Participants
This arm received 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine without epinephrine via intraperitoneal lavage throughout the pelvis immediately prior to loss of peritoneal access.
Placebo
n=47 Participants
This arm received 30 mL of placebo (saline) via intraperitoneal lavage throughout the pelvis immediately prior to loss of peritoneal access.
Pain Score at 8 Hours, 12 Hours and 24 Hours
8-hour
3.27 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.04
3.30 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.37
Pain Score at 8 Hours, 12 Hours and 24 Hours
12-hour
2.84 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.59
2.96 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.94
Pain Score at 8 Hours, 12 Hours and 24 Hours
24-hour
3.00 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.41
2.37 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.98

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: First 24 hours postoperatively

Total opiate consumption postoperatively while inpatient as determined by morphine milligram equivalents (MME)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine
n=44 Participants
This arm received 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine without epinephrine via intraperitoneal lavage throughout the pelvis immediately prior to loss of peritoneal access.
Placebo
n=47 Participants
This arm received 30 mL of placebo (saline) via intraperitoneal lavage throughout the pelvis immediately prior to loss of peritoneal access.
Total Opiate Consumption
25.4 Morphine milligram equivalents
Standard Deviation 22.4
22.0 Morphine milligram equivalents
Standard Deviation 16.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 24 hours

Time to first narcotic dose during inpatient stay

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine
n=44 Participants
This arm received 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine without epinephrine via intraperitoneal lavage throughout the pelvis immediately prior to loss of peritoneal access.
Placebo
n=47 Participants
This arm received 30 mL of placebo (saline) via intraperitoneal lavage throughout the pelvis immediately prior to loss of peritoneal access.
Time to First Narcotic
98.0 Minutes
Standard Deviation 38.6
96.0 Minutes
Standard Deviation 28.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 24 hours

Hospital length of stay

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine
n=44 Participants
This arm received 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine without epinephrine via intraperitoneal lavage throughout the pelvis immediately prior to loss of peritoneal access.
Placebo
n=47 Participants
This arm received 30 mL of placebo (saline) via intraperitoneal lavage throughout the pelvis immediately prior to loss of peritoneal access.
Hospital Length of Stay
1.0 Days
Standard Deviation 0
1.0 Days
Standard Deviation 0.15

Adverse Events

Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 4 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Placebo

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine
n=44 participants at risk
This arm received 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine without epinephrine via intraperitoneal lavage throughout the pelvis immediately prior to loss of peritoneal access.
Placebo
n=47 participants at risk
This arm received 30 mL of placebo (saline) via intraperitoneal lavage throughout the pelvis immediately prior to loss of peritoneal access.
Renal and urinary disorders
Other
2.3%
1/44 • up to 6 weeks after surgery
0.00%
0/47 • up to 6 weeks after surgery
Gastrointestinal disorders
Other
2.3%
1/44 • up to 6 weeks after surgery
0.00%
0/47 • up to 6 weeks after surgery
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Other
2.3%
1/44 • up to 6 weeks after surgery
0.00%
0/47 • up to 6 weeks after surgery

Additional Information

Jose Lazaro

Indiana University School of Medicine

Phone: 7274241947

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place