Blood-Based Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Implementation Into Clinical Practice Highlands
NCT ID: NCT06119425
Last Updated: 2023-11-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
600 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-10-12
2024-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Screening Tests in Detecting Colorectal Cancer
NCT00025025
Accelerating Colorectal Cancer Screening Through Implementation Science in Appalachia
NCT04427527
Assessing Repeat Fit Testing for CRC
NCT03248661
Colorectal Cancer Screening Intervention for Family Members of Colorectal Cancer Patients
NCT00582829
Gut Microbiota and Color-rectal Cancer.
NCT04662853
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Although multiple screening options for CRC are available, participation and adherence to CRC screening remains below the national goal. CRC screening rate at the Ballad Health Mountain Laurel Internal Medicine clinic (site 1) is approximately 66%.
A blood-based test (BBT) can provide a clinically important complement to standard-of-care (SOC) screening tests and address unmet medical needs for patients, especially for those who are non-adherent with current screening modalities. There are economic and societal benefits in early detection and prevention of CRC in a broader population than the one currently up to date with screening. The unmet need for maximum participation in CRC screening could be addressed with blood-based testing.
Measuring subsequent provider experience and implementation behavior patterns involving blood based non-invasive cancer screening choices will also help to identify clinical utility of such test and implementation into clinical practice.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control
Patients judged to be at average risk of CRC will be engaged in a conversation about CRC risk factors and standard of care (SOC) screening options. Patients who express a desire to be screened using the SOC options will be considered part of the control group.
No interventions assigned to this group
Experimental
Patients judged to be at average risk of CRC will be engaged in a conversation about CRC risk factors and standard of care (SOC) screening options as well as the option to be screened with a blood-based test which is not currently standard of care. Patients who express a desire to be screened using the SOC options or the blood-based non-SOC option will be considered part of the experimental group.
blood-based CRC screening
For this study, a commercially available blood-based CRC screening test will be used. The selected test is Shield (Guardant Health, Redwood City, California, USA). The Shield test was developed, and its performance characteristics determined, by the Guardant Health Clinical Laboratory in Redwood City, California, USA, which is certified under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act of 1988 (CLIA) as qualified to perform high complexity clinical testing. The Shield test is currently commercially available as an laboratory developed test (LDT). Additionally, Guardant submitted the pre-market approval (PMA) application for the Shield test to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in March of 2023. Premarket approval (PMA) is the FDA process of scientific and regulatory review to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of medical devices. To this end, the Shield test is currently under review by the FDA.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
blood-based CRC screening
For this study, a commercially available blood-based CRC screening test will be used. The selected test is Shield (Guardant Health, Redwood City, California, USA). The Shield test was developed, and its performance characteristics determined, by the Guardant Health Clinical Laboratory in Redwood City, California, USA, which is certified under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act of 1988 (CLIA) as qualified to perform high complexity clinical testing. The Shield test is currently commercially available as an laboratory developed test (LDT). Additionally, Guardant submitted the pre-market approval (PMA) application for the Shield test to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in March of 2023. Premarket approval (PMA) is the FDA process of scientific and regulatory review to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of medical devices. To this end, the Shield test is currently under review by the FDA.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Considered by health-care providers to be "average risk" for CRC as determined by USPSTF guidelines
If a patient opts for blood-based test, they are able and willing to provide blood samples per protocol
Ability to understand and the willingness to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria
Patients with a known high-risk family history of CRC precluding the patient from being average risk
Patients with known diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease or history of polyps
Patients who are currently symptomatic for CRC such as: blood in the stool
Patients with any known medical condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, should preclude enrollment into the study
Have a recorded up to date CRC screening
Patients with a previous abnormal colonoscopy finding who are due for surveillance.
45 Years
84 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ballad Health
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Karen J. Elmore, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ballad Health
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Johnson City Medical Center
Johnson City, Tennessee, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2082244-1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.