Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
90 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-11-25
2025-12-09
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study aims to provide a select sedentary subpopulation with a customized intervention hypothesized to increase their PA adoption. Novel recruiting methods are used to identify a target subpopulation (based on multiple characteristics) that can be contacted in multiple sections of North America. We will intervene online and rigorously test the theoretical formulations that identify the subpopulation and the customized intervention.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prosocial Exercise: Does Exercising for Charity Result in Greater Well-Being and Physical Activity?
NCT02573454
"Increasing Physical Activity in Canadian Adults Affected by COVID-19 Social Distancing Restrictions: A Feasibility Trial of an Online Intervention"
NCT04400305
Examining Exercise, Health Coaching and Meditation for University Employees
NCT02936726
Exploring the Effect of an Intervention on Women's Physical Activity Behaviour
NCT03601663
Physical Activity for Campus Employees
NCT01617499
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Physical inactivity (PI) in North America (NA) is associated with high levels of excess morbidity-mortality (Arraiz et al., 1992; Knight, 2012; Villeneuve et al., 1998) with significant decreases in morbidity-mortality predicted with increased physical activity (PA) in recent literature (del Pozo Cruz, et al., 2022; Fogelholm, 2010; Katzmarzyk \& Mason, 2009; Peterson et al., 2014; Warburton \& Bredin, 2017).
The lower range of prevalence indicators of PI suggest that 47% of Americans (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention \[CDC\], n.d.) and 51% of Canadians (Statistics Canada, 2021) do not reach the PA guidelines of 150 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) weekly. The upper end estimates point to approximately 80% of adults being too sedentary to gain health benefits (Piercy et al., 2018).
Recent evidence analyzed by the US 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee (US Department of Health and Human Services \[HHS\], 2018), based on extensive literature review, indicates strong PI associations with increased all-cause mortality. Also noteworthy were specifically increased incidences of: 9.9% for cardiovascular diseases; 6.5% for stroke; 2.2% for hypertension; and 5.9% for Type 2 diabetes. Increased incidences were also associated with cancer-related diseases (2.9% for bladder cancer; 3.6% for breast cancer; and 3.9% for colon cancer) (Katzmarzyk et al., 2022). The estimated healthcare costs attributable to PI in Canada were $2.1 billion (1999) and $2.4 billion (2009), the latter figure associated with indirect costs of $4.3 billion and total costs of $6.8 billion (Katzmarzyk et al., 2000).
Given the importance of reducing mortality-morbidity, more effective Physical Activity (PA) interventions are important, and the recently observed stabilizations of PI levels suggest that novel methods must be explored (Ozemek et al., 2019). This study aims to provide a select sedentary subpopulation with a customized intervention hypothesized to increase their PA adoption. Novel recruiting methods are used to identify a target subpopulation (based on multiple characteristics) that can be contacted in multiple sections of North America. We will intervene online and rigorously test the theoretical formulations that identify the subpopulation and the customized intervention.
Aims and Objectives:
A. To estimate the approximate number of North American individuals who visit Christian - oriented online programs and dialogue on these programs about personally meaningful issues. This estimate is relevant to the potential for online PA interventions to reach ample populations and deliver adoption stimulating, reinforcing effects that result in increased MVPA.
B. To assess within a randomized controlled trial (RCT) whether an online Christianbased CBT-PA intervention is more effective than a comparison wait list control condition, in terms of increased MVPA as assessed by self-report (IPAQ), Fitbit (online\] tracked steps, and self-reported changes in body mass index (BMI).
C. To assess within a RCT whether engagement with and/or adherence to the online Christian-based PA intervention (i.e. online workbooks completed, online text messages exchanged, phone sessions completed) predicts increased MVPA.
D. To compare the cost-effectiveness of the online Christian-based PA intervention to the comparison wait-list control condition at post-intervention (4 months) and at 2 months post-follow up (6 months).
Hypotheses
A. An increasing number of North Americans visit Christian online groups and programs and exchange dialogues on personally meaningful Christianity issues. Amidst the \~231 million Christians estimated to reside in North America, we believe an increasing proportion (30% to 40%) are engaging in online visits per month (Johnson et al., 2018).
B. The Christian-based CBT-PA intervention is more effective than the comparison (wait list control) condition in terms of significantly increased MVPA as assessed by self-report (IPAQ), Fitbit (online) tracked steps, and self-reported changes in body mass index (BMI).
C. Engagement in and adherence to the online Christian-based PA intervention (i.e. online workbooks completed, online text messages exchanged, phone sessions completed) will predict significantly increased MVPA in the experimental group.
D. The online Christian-based PA intervention program will be significantly more cost effective when compared to the comparison condition at postintervention and at 2 months follow up.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental
Sixteen weeks of phone-based counselling at a rate of 1 session/week and ongoing access to a online platform (Nex J Connected Wellness) that has health promotion text and videos readily accessed in combination with text messaging exchanges between counselor and participant. Participants receive a Fitbit which is connected to the Nex J Connected Wellness such that counselors can monitor steps/day.
Online intervention
Phone counselling for 1 hour/week over 16 weeks and access to the online platform with health promotion materials (videos, text, audios)
Wait list control
Participants wait for 16 weeks.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Online intervention
Phone counselling for 1 hour/week over 16 weeks and access to the online platform with health promotion materials (videos, text, audios)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
55 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
York University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Paul Ritvo
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
York University - School of Kinesiology and Health Science
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
3835
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.