Comparing a Modified Mini-incision Approach Versus the Conventional Approach for Carpal Tunnel Release

NCT ID: NCT06114823

Last Updated: 2023-11-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

68 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-11-01

Study Completion Date

2022-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the commonest nerve compression syndrome in the upper limbs, and carpal tunnel decompression is one of the most prevalent upper limb surgical interventions. Surgeries for CTS may be more effective compared to conservative measures in reducing symptoms and improving hand function, particularly in patients with severe CTS.

The etiology of CTS is multifactorial and includes occupational and personal factors. Physical workload factors play an important role in CTS but the role of some personal factors is less clear. Obesity is a well-documented risk factor for CTS. Hypothyroidism, diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis are possible risk factors for CTS. Finally, the role of smoking in CTS is uncertain.

Traditional approach makes use of a longitudinal skin incision from the palm toward the wrist and across the transverse carpal ligament. Though this approach offers excellent visualization, reliable release of the full retinaculum, and ability to identify anatomic variations, it is associated with some intractable complications, including wound pain, scar tenderness, flexor tendon entrapment and thenar as well as hypothenar (pillar) pain, which are difficult to recovery.

The attempt to perform CTR without extra complications leads to the development of different techniques and several mini-incision approaches.

These techniques help to reduce incisional discomfort after surgery, but it can lead to frequent incidence of blood vessel injury or incomplete release. The mini-incision approaches have the advantage of leaving a smaller scar, less scar pain, and lower grade of pillar pain. Though several methods have been proposed, there were still some disadvantages in them. Though CTR can be safely accomplished by them, incomplete release still occurred in several cases for some reasons.

After intensive research in the current literature, there is a paucity of studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of mini-incision approaches in achieving CTR in Egyptian patients. That is why we conducted the present study to present our experience with the modified mini-incision technique and compare its outcomes to the conventional open approach.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

All selected cases with primary CTS will be submitted to:

I) Preoperative evaluation:

A- Careful history taking: Brief history based on the characteristics of pain, sensory disturbances including numbness, tingling, and/or weakness involving the median nerve distribution. Patients were additionally inquired about their functional status, normal activities, ability to work, family history of diabetes and the use of medications.

B- The visual analogue scale (VAS) (0= no pain to 10= worst possible pain), will be used to assess the severity of diabetic neuropathic pain.

C- Neurosensory examination mainly included percussion over a distribution of the affected peripheral nerve (Tinel sign) and two-point discrimination (2-PD) using the Disk-Criminator.

D- Nerve conduction velocity (NCV).

II) Surgical Technique:

All patients are positioned on the operating table in supine position and anesthetized with local anaesthesia.

A) For the conventional approach: a palmar longitudinal incision began at the axis of the ring finger, passed between the thenar and hypothenar eminences, and continued proximally to the proximal flexor crease of the wrist. After exposing the underlying transverse carpal ligament, its ulnar side was cut longitudinally. The median nerve was identified and protected, and then the wound was closed in routine manner.

B) For the new mini-incision approach: a special metal guide with a groove at the center is used. The incision is started above the proximal flexor crease of the wrist and is advanced proximally for 1.5-2.0 cm. After opening the superficial fascia, blunt dissection with a mosquito clamp is performed till the median nerve appears and the guide is inserted into the carpal tunnel, then a scissor is inserted along the groove in the guide and the transverse carpal ligament is cut proximally and distally.

III) Postoperative follow up:

The follow-up was conducted mainly on an outpatient basis comparing the postoperative outcome in both groups as regard improvement of symptoms, postoperative complications, scar effect and recurrence of symptoms. Patients will be followed up at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post decompression.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Incision

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

mini incision group

Patients were subjected to a longitudinal mini-incision started just above the proximal flexor wrist crease and then extended for 1.5 - 2 cm in a proximal direction.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

carpal tunnel release mini-incision

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients were subjected to a longitudinal mini-incision started just above the proximal flexor wrist crease and then extended for 1.5 - 2 cm in a proximal direction

carpal tunnel release conventional incision

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients were subjected a longitudinal incision which was created between the thenar and hypothenar eminences along the longitudinal axis of the ring finger. Then, it was extended to the proximal flexor wrist crease.

conventional group

Patients were subjected a longitudinal incision which was created between the thenar and hypothenar eminences along the longitudinal axis of the ring finger. Then, it was extended to the proximal flexor wrist crease.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

carpal tunnel release mini-incision

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients were subjected to a longitudinal mini-incision started just above the proximal flexor wrist crease and then extended for 1.5 - 2 cm in a proximal direction

carpal tunnel release conventional incision

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients were subjected a longitudinal incision which was created between the thenar and hypothenar eminences along the longitudinal axis of the ring finger. Then, it was extended to the proximal flexor wrist crease.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

carpal tunnel release mini-incision

Patients were subjected to a longitudinal mini-incision started just above the proximal flexor wrist crease and then extended for 1.5 - 2 cm in a proximal direction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

carpal tunnel release conventional incision

Patients were subjected a longitudinal incision which was created between the thenar and hypothenar eminences along the longitudinal axis of the ring finger. Then, it was extended to the proximal flexor wrist crease.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients with primary CTS attending Mansoura university hospitals with EMG-and NCS-proved median neuropathy at the wrist.
2. Failed conservative treatment.
3. Absence of any other hand pathology.
4. Positive Tinel sign presented at the site of nerve entrapment (the carpal tunnel at the wrist for the median nerve).
5. Signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Presence of proximal radiculopathy.
2. Previous history of cervical spondylosis.
3. Inflammatory joint disease and gout.
4. Presence of combined nerve compression.
5. Having a previous hand or upper extremity surgery.
6. Patients with incomplete follow-up data were also excluded from this study.
7. Psychiatric disease or any other condition that is at risk of being influenced by the study or that might have affected completion of the study.
8. Patient refusal
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mansoura University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mohamed Mostafa

consultant and lecturer of general surgery

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

mohamed mahmoud, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mansoura faculty of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Fuclty of Medicine, Mansoura University

Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2345

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Carpal Tunnel Release Efficacy Trial
NCT06934187 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Mild Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
NCT00981565 COMPLETED NA