Comparing a Modified Mini-incision Approach Versus the Conventional Approach for Carpal Tunnel Release
NCT ID: NCT06114823
Last Updated: 2023-11-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
68 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-11-01
2022-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The etiology of CTS is multifactorial and includes occupational and personal factors. Physical workload factors play an important role in CTS but the role of some personal factors is less clear. Obesity is a well-documented risk factor for CTS. Hypothyroidism, diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis are possible risk factors for CTS. Finally, the role of smoking in CTS is uncertain.
Traditional approach makes use of a longitudinal skin incision from the palm toward the wrist and across the transverse carpal ligament. Though this approach offers excellent visualization, reliable release of the full retinaculum, and ability to identify anatomic variations, it is associated with some intractable complications, including wound pain, scar tenderness, flexor tendon entrapment and thenar as well as hypothenar (pillar) pain, which are difficult to recovery.
The attempt to perform CTR without extra complications leads to the development of different techniques and several mini-incision approaches.
These techniques help to reduce incisional discomfort after surgery, but it can lead to frequent incidence of blood vessel injury or incomplete release. The mini-incision approaches have the advantage of leaving a smaller scar, less scar pain, and lower grade of pillar pain. Though several methods have been proposed, there were still some disadvantages in them. Though CTR can be safely accomplished by them, incomplete release still occurred in several cases for some reasons.
After intensive research in the current literature, there is a paucity of studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of mini-incision approaches in achieving CTR in Egyptian patients. That is why we conducted the present study to present our experience with the modified mini-incision technique and compare its outcomes to the conventional open approach.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Injection With Median Nerve Decompression Surgery in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
NCT06243848
Minimal Invasive Carpal Tunnel Release With the Novel Device
NCT05067205
A Comparison of Incisionless Ultrasound Guided Thread Carpal Tunnel Release and Mini Open Carpal in Patients With Bilateral Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
NCT03906604
Multimodal Approach of Electrotherapy Versus Nerve Flossing Technique in Patient With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
NCT05164237
Comparison of Conventional Versus Transverse Mini-Incision Technique for Carpal Tunnel Release
NCT07018011
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
I) Preoperative evaluation:
A- Careful history taking: Brief history based on the characteristics of pain, sensory disturbances including numbness, tingling, and/or weakness involving the median nerve distribution. Patients were additionally inquired about their functional status, normal activities, ability to work, family history of diabetes and the use of medications.
B- The visual analogue scale (VAS) (0= no pain to 10= worst possible pain), will be used to assess the severity of diabetic neuropathic pain.
C- Neurosensory examination mainly included percussion over a distribution of the affected peripheral nerve (Tinel sign) and two-point discrimination (2-PD) using the Disk-Criminator.
D- Nerve conduction velocity (NCV).
II) Surgical Technique:
All patients are positioned on the operating table in supine position and anesthetized with local anaesthesia.
A) For the conventional approach: a palmar longitudinal incision began at the axis of the ring finger, passed between the thenar and hypothenar eminences, and continued proximally to the proximal flexor crease of the wrist. After exposing the underlying transverse carpal ligament, its ulnar side was cut longitudinally. The median nerve was identified and protected, and then the wound was closed in routine manner.
B) For the new mini-incision approach: a special metal guide with a groove at the center is used. The incision is started above the proximal flexor crease of the wrist and is advanced proximally for 1.5-2.0 cm. After opening the superficial fascia, blunt dissection with a mosquito clamp is performed till the median nerve appears and the guide is inserted into the carpal tunnel, then a scissor is inserted along the groove in the guide and the transverse carpal ligament is cut proximally and distally.
III) Postoperative follow up:
The follow-up was conducted mainly on an outpatient basis comparing the postoperative outcome in both groups as regard improvement of symptoms, postoperative complications, scar effect and recurrence of symptoms. Patients will be followed up at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post decompression.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
mini incision group
Patients were subjected to a longitudinal mini-incision started just above the proximal flexor wrist crease and then extended for 1.5 - 2 cm in a proximal direction.
carpal tunnel release mini-incision
Patients were subjected to a longitudinal mini-incision started just above the proximal flexor wrist crease and then extended for 1.5 - 2 cm in a proximal direction
carpal tunnel release conventional incision
Patients were subjected a longitudinal incision which was created between the thenar and hypothenar eminences along the longitudinal axis of the ring finger. Then, it was extended to the proximal flexor wrist crease.
conventional group
Patients were subjected a longitudinal incision which was created between the thenar and hypothenar eminences along the longitudinal axis of the ring finger. Then, it was extended to the proximal flexor wrist crease.
carpal tunnel release mini-incision
Patients were subjected to a longitudinal mini-incision started just above the proximal flexor wrist crease and then extended for 1.5 - 2 cm in a proximal direction
carpal tunnel release conventional incision
Patients were subjected a longitudinal incision which was created between the thenar and hypothenar eminences along the longitudinal axis of the ring finger. Then, it was extended to the proximal flexor wrist crease.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
carpal tunnel release mini-incision
Patients were subjected to a longitudinal mini-incision started just above the proximal flexor wrist crease and then extended for 1.5 - 2 cm in a proximal direction
carpal tunnel release conventional incision
Patients were subjected a longitudinal incision which was created between the thenar and hypothenar eminences along the longitudinal axis of the ring finger. Then, it was extended to the proximal flexor wrist crease.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Failed conservative treatment.
3. Absence of any other hand pathology.
4. Positive Tinel sign presented at the site of nerve entrapment (the carpal tunnel at the wrist for the median nerve).
5. Signed informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Previous history of cervical spondylosis.
3. Inflammatory joint disease and gout.
4. Presence of combined nerve compression.
5. Having a previous hand or upper extremity surgery.
6. Patients with incomplete follow-up data were also excluded from this study.
7. Psychiatric disease or any other condition that is at risk of being influenced by the study or that might have affected completion of the study.
8. Patient refusal
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mansoura University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mohamed Mostafa
consultant and lecturer of general surgery
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
mohamed mahmoud, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mansoura faculty of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Fuclty of Medicine, Mansoura University
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2345
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.