Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Versus Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in the Treatment of T3 Rectal Cancer
NCT ID: NCT06097416
Last Updated: 2023-10-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
PHASE3
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-10-31
2030-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Primary --\>To compare the effects neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for T3 rectal cancer on overall survival.
Secondary --\> To compare the effects neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NARCT) and total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for cT3 rectal cancer on clinical outcomes:
* Clinical complete response (cCR)
* Pathological complete response (pCR)
* Disease-free survival (DFS)
* Organ preservation
* Overall morbidity / mortality
* Treatment-related morbidity / mortality
* Peri-operative outcomes
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Total Neoadjuvant Treatment vs. Chemoradiotherapy in Local Advanced Rectal Cancer With High Risk Factors
NCT03177382
Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Versus Standard Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
NCT05274945
Pre-operative 3-DCRT vs IMRT for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
NCT02151019
A Clinical Trial Comparing Long-Course Versus Short-Course Radiotherapy Followed by Immunotherapy Combined With Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT) to Long-Course Radiotherapy Followed by TNT in High-Risk Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
NCT07113275
IMRT Versus IMPT With Concurrent Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Anal Canal Cancer
NCT06630793
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
The NARCT regimen is prescribed specifically as standard 5-FU over several weeks. The CRT regimen consists of the standard algorithms: a total of 5400-5600 cGy of radiation (4500 cGy to the pelvis, with an integrated boost to the primary tumour and involved nodes of 500 cGy followed by an option boost to the primary tumour and involved nodes) delivered in 27-28 fractions, respectively, of 180-200 cGy each over a 5-6 week period.
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy
5-FU is a fluoropyrimidine antimetabolite considered to act primarily as an inhibitor of thymidylate synthase. 5-FU is supplied as a colourless-to-faint yellow solution in 10-mL single use vials. Each 10 mL of solution contains 500 mg 5-FU, with pH adjusted to approximately 9.2 with sodium hydroxide.
The CRT regimen consists of the standard algorithms: a total of 5400-5600 cGy of radiation (4500 cGy to the pelvis, with an integrated boost to the primary tumour and involved nodes of 500 cGy followed by an option boost to the primary tumour and involved nodes) delivered in 27-28 fractions, respectively, of 180-200 cGy each over a 5-6 week period.
Total Neoadjuvant Therapy
Sequence of TNT regimen can be classified as induction (chemotherapy first) or consolidation (radiation first) treatment. All patients received the same chemotherapy (FOLFOX) and long-course chemoradiotherapy (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions) before surgery. However timing of TNT can differ depending on concerns of local and distal failure.
Total Neoadjuvant Therapy
5-FU is a fluoropyrimidine antimetabolite considered to act primarily as an inhibitor of thymidylate synthase. 5-FU is supplied as a colourless-to-faint yellow solution in 10-mL single use vials. Each 10 mL of solution contains 500 mg 5-FU, with pH adjusted to approximately 9.2 with sodium hydroxide.
Oxaliplatin is an organoplatinum complex in which the platinum atom is complexed with 1,2- diaminocyclohexane with an oxalate ligand as a leaving group. Platinum content is 48.1% to 50.1%.
All patients received the same chemotherapy (FOLFOX) and long-course chemoradiotherapy (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions) before surgery.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy
5-FU is a fluoropyrimidine antimetabolite considered to act primarily as an inhibitor of thymidylate synthase. 5-FU is supplied as a colourless-to-faint yellow solution in 10-mL single use vials. Each 10 mL of solution contains 500 mg 5-FU, with pH adjusted to approximately 9.2 with sodium hydroxide.
The CRT regimen consists of the standard algorithms: a total of 5400-5600 cGy of radiation (4500 cGy to the pelvis, with an integrated boost to the primary tumour and involved nodes of 500 cGy followed by an option boost to the primary tumour and involved nodes) delivered in 27-28 fractions, respectively, of 180-200 cGy each over a 5-6 week period.
Total Neoadjuvant Therapy
5-FU is a fluoropyrimidine antimetabolite considered to act primarily as an inhibitor of thymidylate synthase. 5-FU is supplied as a colourless-to-faint yellow solution in 10-mL single use vials. Each 10 mL of solution contains 500 mg 5-FU, with pH adjusted to approximately 9.2 with sodium hydroxide.
Oxaliplatin is an organoplatinum complex in which the platinum atom is complexed with 1,2- diaminocyclohexane with an oxalate ligand as a leaving group. Platinum content is 48.1% to 50.1%.
All patients received the same chemotherapy (FOLFOX) and long-course chemoradiotherapy (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions) before surgery.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Histologically or cytologically confirmed surgically resectable adenocarcinoma of the rectum.
3. Clinical stage II (T3, N-) \\
4. Absence of metastatic disease
5. Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status \> 2.
6. Age \> to 18.
7. Estimated life expectancy ≥ 12 months.
8. No active infections requiring systemic antibiotic treatment (oral antibiotics are acceptable at the discretion of the treating physician).
9. Measurable disease, as defined by RECIST Version 1.1
10. Adequate haematological, hepatic, and renal function defined as:
a. Renal: i. Calculated creatinine clearance (CrCl) \> 50ml/min (see Appendix G)
b. Liver function tests: i. Total Bilirubin \< 1.5 ULN
(OR \< 3 x ULN (\< Grade 2) in the presence of documented Gilbert's syndrome (unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia) or liver metastases at baseline.) ii. ALT and AST \< 2.5 x ULN (\< 5 x ULN with liver involvement of their cancer) iii. Alkaline Phosphatase \< 2.5 x ULN (\< 5 x ULN with liver involvement of their cancer)
c. Haematology: i. Haemoglobin \> 9 g/dL (\< Grade 1) ii. Absolute neutrophil count \> 1.5 x 109/L iii. Platelet count \> 100 x109/L (≤ Grade 1)
11. Normal thyroid function defined as a TSH within normal local institutional range
12. Able to swallow and retain oral medication
13. Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) and male patients with partners of childbearing potential; agree to remain abstinent (refrain from heterosexual intercourse) or use highly effective contraception measures during the treatment period. For women, highly effective contraception should be used, for X months after last dose of (INSERT AGENT). For men, highly effective contraception should be used, for X months after (INSERT AGENT). (Highly effective contraception is defined in the study as methods that achieve a failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly. Such methods include:
i. Combined (oestrogen and progestogen containing) hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, intravaginal, transdermal).
ii. Progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, injectable and implantable).
iii. Intrauterine device (IUD). iv. Intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS). v. Bilateral tubal occlusion. vi. Successfully vasectomised partner. vii. Sexual abstinence.)
14. Women of childbearing potential must have pregnancy excluded by urine or serum beta-HCG testing within 7 days prior to registration.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Received prior chemotherapy for local or metastatic disease.
2. Locally advanced rectal cancer; \>T3, Nodal disease
3. Primary unresectable rectal cancer. A tumour is considered unresectable when invading adjacent organs and an en bloc resection will not achieve negative margins.
4. Received prior pelvic radiotherapy.
5. Patients unable to undergo MRI.
6. Previous or concurrent active malignancy ≤ 5 years prior to registration with the exception of non-melanotic skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of any type, or other cancers that the treating Investigator does not feel will impact the study objectives.
7. Screening electrocardiogram (ECG) with evidence of:
1. QT prolongation (QTc \> 450ms in males and \> 470ms in females)
2. Clinically significant cardiac arrhythmias, complete left bundle branch block, high atrioventricular AV block (e.g. bi-vascular block , Mobitz type II and third degree AV block
3. Other severe cardiac dysfunction
(ECG must be assessed for all patients within 14 days prior to registration).
8. Clinically significant cardiovascular disease including:
1. Cerebrovascular accident within 6 months prior to registration
2. Myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to registration
3. Uncontrolled angina
4. Uncontrolled or poorly controlled arterial hypertension (i.e. BP \>150/90mmHg under treatment with at a maximum three antihypertensive drugs)
5. Clinically significant valvular disease
6. Congestive Heart Failure (NYHA \> Class 2 (See Appendix E)
7. Known family history of idiopathic cardiac arrest or sudden death whereby a cardiac cause cannot be excluded
8. Known history or family history of Brugada Syndrome.
9. Known pulmonary compromise, as determined by the treating investigator, resulting from intercurrent pulmonary illness, but not limited to, any pulmonary disorder (e.g. severe asthma, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), restrictive lung disease.
10. Creatinine level \>1.5x ULN
11. Patients with a history of any arterial thromobotic event within the past 6 months. This includes angina (stable or unstable), MI, TIA or CVA.
12. Patients with a history of venous thrombotic episodes such as DVT, PE occurring more than 6 months prior to enrolment may be considered for protocol participation, provided they are on stable doses of anticoagulant therapy. Similarly, patients who are anticoagulated for atrial fibrillation or other conditions may participate, provided they are on stable doses of anticoagulant therapy.
13. Pregnant or nursing women.
14. Concurrent treatment with any other investigational agents within 30 days prior to registration.
15. Any psychological, physical, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule; (those conditions should be discussed with the patient before registration in the trial).
16. Unable or unwilling to discontinue (and substitute if necessary) use of prohibited medications for at least 30 days prior to and for the duration of study treatment (see section 7.5 for a description of prohibited medications).
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
St. James's Hospital, Ireland
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michael Kelly
Consultant Colorectal Surgeon
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, Rodel C, Wittekind C, Fietkau R, Martus P, Tschmelitsch J, Hager E, Hess CF, Karstens JH, Liersch T, Schmidberger H, Raab R; German Rectal Cancer Study Group. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 21;351(17):1731-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040694.
Kong JC, Soucisse M, Michael M, Tie J, Ngan SY, Leong T, McCormick J, Warrier SK, Heriot AG. Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis of Oncological and Operative Outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Nov;28(12):7476-7486. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09837-8. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
Feeney G, Sehgal R, Sheehan M, Hogan A, Regan M, Joyce M, Kerin M. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer management. World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep 7;25(33):4850-4869. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i33.4850.
Hoendervangers S, Burbach JPM, Lacle MM, Koopman M, van Grevenstein WMU, Intven MPW, Verkooijen HM. Pathological Complete Response Following Different Neoadjuvant Treatment Strategies for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Oct;27(11):4319-4336. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08615-2. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
Lorimer PD, Motz BM, Kirks RC, Boselli DM, Walsh KK, Prabhu RS, Hill JS, Salo JC. Pathologic Complete Response Rates After Neoadjuvant Treatment in Rectal Cancer: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Aug;24(8):2095-2103. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5873-8. Epub 2017 May 22.
Li Y, Wang J, Ma X, Tan L, Yan Y, Xue C, Hui B, Liu R, Ma H, Ren J. A Review of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Int J Biol Sci. 2016 Jul 17;12(8):1022-31. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.15438. eCollection 2016.
Bujko K, Wyrwicz L, Rutkowski A, Malinowska M, Pietrzak L, Krynski J, Michalski W, Oledzki J, Kusnierz J, Zajac L, Bednarczyk M, Szczepkowski M, Tarnowski W, Kosakowska E, Zwolinski J, Winiarek M, Wisniowska K, Partycki M, Beczkowska K, Polkowski W, Stylinski R, Wierzbicki R, Bury P, Jankiewicz M, Paprota K, Lewicka M, Cisel B, Skorzewska M, Mielko J, Bebenek M, Maciejczyk A, Kapturkiewicz B, Dybko A, Hajac L, Wojnar A, Lesniak T, Zygulska J, Jantner D, Chudyba E, Zegarski W, Las-Jankowska M, Jankowski M, Kolodziejski L, Radkowski A, Zelazowska-Omiotek U, Czeremszynska B, Kepka L, Kolb-Sielecki J, Toczko Z, Fedorowicz Z, Dziki A, Danek A, Nawrocki G, Sopylo R, Markiewicz W, Kedzierawski P, Wydmanski J; Polish Colorectal Study Group. Long-course oxaliplatin-based preoperative chemoradiation versus 5 x 5 Gy and consolidation chemotherapy for cT4 or fixed cT3 rectal cancer: results of a randomized phase III study. Ann Oncol. 2016 May;27(5):834-42. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw062. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
St. James's Hospital
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.