PRogrammed Versus Modified Natural Cycle After Euploid Failed Embryo Transfer

NCT ID: NCT06074055

Last Updated: 2025-02-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

9 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-10-25

Study Completion Date

2024-10-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to compare frozen embryo transfer protocols in patients undergoing a second frozen embryo transfer (FET) after a unsuccessful first programmed FET cycle as a possible treatment for people undergoing infertility treatment.

The purpose of this research study is to:

* Determine if there is a difference between FET protocols in patients who require a second FET cycle.
* Investigate if switching the FET protocol after a failed programmed cycle is beneficial for patients undergoing a second FET cycle.
* Examine pregnancy outcomes including obstetrical and neonatal outcomes (if applicable)
* Obtain uterine flexibility/stiffness measurements via transvaginal ultrasound prior to the embryo transfer procedure. This is called shear wave elastography.

Participants will be randomized in their second FET transfer attempt to either another programmed protocol or a modified natural protocol.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This research study is studying if there is a difference in frozen embryo transfer protocols used (modified natural versus programmed) after a failed first programmed FET cycle, defined as either a negative pregnancy test or a biochemical loss, as a possible treatment for people undergoing infertility treatment and in vitro fertilization (IVF). Participants will be randomized, in a 1:1 ratio, in their second FET transfer attempt to either another programmed protocol or a modified natural protocol. Once randomized, participants will undergo routine FET monitoring based on their randomization allocation, transfer procedure and pregnancy monitoring as applicable. Additional ultrasound images will be obtained prior to the transfer procedure to assess the stiffness or flexibility of the uterus, called shear wave elastography. A participant blood sample and infant buccal swab will be collected for future research studies.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Infertility, Female

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Programmed FET Protocol

Patients in this arm of the study will proceed with another programmed FET protocol which involves taking exogenous estrogen by mouth to stimulate the uterine lining to grow and develop. Once the lining has reached ≥ 7 mm and an endometrial pattern of type 1 or type 2, intramuscular progesterone in oil (50mg/ml daily) will be started at 8am on the morning that progesterone is initiated and continued per routine.

Group Type OTHER

FET Protocol

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants are randomized to either another programmed FET Protocol vs. a modified natural FET protocol

Modified Natural FET Protocol

Following development of at least one dominant follicle and endometrial proliferation ≥ 7 mm during cycle monitoring, patient will undergo administration of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger shot followed by initiation of vaginal progesterone administration in accordance with institutional protocols.

Group Type OTHER

FET Protocol

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants are randomized to either another programmed FET Protocol vs. a modified natural FET protocol

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

FET Protocol

Participants are randomized to either another programmed FET Protocol vs. a modified natural FET protocol

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients planning to undergo frozen embryo transfer cycle with a single euploid blastocyst.
2. Patients who have previously undergone their first unsuccessful frozen embryo transfer cycle, defined as either failure of implantation with negative pregnancy test or biochemical pregnancy, using a programmed cycle protocol.
3. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) of the embryo used in failed programmed embryo transfer cycle must have occurred after January 1, 2017.
4. Patients ages 18 to 53 years old as per practice guidelines.
5. Patients with BMI between 16-45 kg/m2.
6. Patients with at least one embryo remaining in storage, from either the same or a separate cohort.
7. Patients with proven ovulatory function, as defined by the presence of regular menstrual cycles or detection of luteinizing hormone surge on serum or urinary test kits.
8. Patients with ≥ 7 mm endometrial thickness prior to progesterone start in prior transfer cycle.
9. Normal uterine cavity as evidenced by recent (within 1 year) saline sonogram or hysteroscopy.

Exclusion Criteria

1. More than 1 prior unsuccessful frozen embryo transfer cycle.
2. The prior FET failure having had resulted in a clinical loss or ectopic pregnancy
3. Previously cancelled frozen embryo transfer cycle for inadequate endometrial response.
4. Patients who required a different route of estrogen administration in the prior programmed cycle (vaginal, transdermal, intramuscular).
5. PGT-A analysis of the available embryo for transfer performed prior to January 1, 2017.
6. Anovulatory or oligo-ovulatory patients unable to undergo modified natural endometrial preparation.
7. Patients with an endometrial thickness \< 7 mm prior to progesterone start in prior cycle.
8. History of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, including gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, and eclampsia.
9. Mullerian anomalies, excluding arcuate uterus and repaired septum.
10. No euploid embryos available for transfer.
11. Concurrent submucosal fibroids, unrepaired uterine defects or present indication for uterine surgery.
12. Communicating hydrosalpinx without plans for surgical correction prior to study enrollment.
13. Failure of patient to agree to enrollment in study with written consent.
14. Concurrent pregnancy.
15. Concomitant use of adjunctive therapies for endometrial proliferation or receptivity, including anticoagulation and antihistamines. These must be discontinued upon enrollment.
16. Embryo planned to be used for transfer generated from surgically obtained sperm.
17. Recurrent/persistent endometrial fluid in prior cycles visualized on the majority of transvaginal ultrasound monitoring.
18. Third party reproduction patients (donor sperm sources can be included).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

53 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Emre U Seli, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey

Basking Ridge, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey

Marlton, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2302-BRG-024-ES

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.