PBI-MST-01(NCT04541108) Substudy TAK-02: Intratumoral Microdosing of TAK-676 in HNSCC
NCT ID: NCT06062602
Last Updated: 2023-10-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
EARLY_PHASE1
15 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-07-26
2022-11-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Intratumoral Microdosing of TAK-981 in Head and Neck Cancer
NCT04065555
Induction Chemotherapy Comparing Taxotere® Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil (TPF) With Standard Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil (PF) Followed by Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer
NCT00273546
CD40 Agonist and PD-1 Inhibitor in HNSCC
NCT06159621
A Clinical Trial of TQB2618 Injection Combined With Penpulimab Injection and Chemotherapy Versus Penpulimab Injection Combined With Chemotherapy in First-line Treatment of Relapsed/Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
NCT05783921
Neoadjuvant Toripalimab + Chemotherapy ± Cetuximab in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (Neo-ICT)
NCT06647563
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In this Phase 0 intratumoral microdosing substudy in human patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (who will be undergoing previously planned tumor and/or regional node dissection), we will evaluate the ability of TAK-676 to activate innate immune effector cells within the local tumor microenvironment. Additionally, this study will examine the effect of TAK-676 in combination with Carboplatin, or Paclitaxel, or in combination with 2 agents Carboplatin and 5-FU, or Carboplatin and Paclitaxel to study whether TAK-676 enhances the localized immune responses compared to both immunotherapy combinations or Carboplatin alone. All investigational drug combinations will be delivered intratumorally in subtherapeutic microdose quantities via the CIVO platform.
The CIVO Microdose Injection Device (MID) penetrates solid tumors and delivers subtherapeutic microdoses of up to eight anti-cancer agents, or combinations of anti-cancer agents, co-injected with CIVO GLO into discrete regions of the tumor. At the time of the planned surgical intervention (4 hours up to four days after the CIVO microdose injection), the injected tumor tissue is then excised and tumor responses are assessed via histological staining of tumor cross-sections sampled perpendicular to each injection column. Co-injection with CIVO GLO enables identification of each injection site during resection as well as in tissues stained for biomarker analysis. Because the platform delivers microdose amounts of each test agent, or combination, directly into the patient's tumor tissue, mechanistic hypotheses can be tested early in the drug development process, consistent with the goals of the 2006 FDA Exploratory Investigational New Drug (IND) Guidance for Industry.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
TAK-676, Carboplatin, 5-FU, & Paclitaxel
Patients who are scheduled for surgical biopsy or tumor resection surgery will be injected at least four hours to up to four days prior to surgery using the CIVO device. Each needle of the CIVO device will deliver up to 8.3 microliters of solution, including a vehicle control (sterile saline) or subtherapeutic microdoses of TAK-676, carboplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5- FU), or paclitaxel as single agents or in combination. Each microdose is simultaneously injected in a columnar fashion through each of 8, 5, or 3 needles (in a device configuration determined by tumor dimensions) into a single solid tumor or effaced metastatic lymph node.
TAK-676
Intratumoral microdose injection by the CIVO device.
Carboplatin
Intratumoral microdose injection by the CIVO device.
5-FU
Intratumoral microdose injection by the CIVO device.
Paclitaxel
Intratumoral microdose injection by the CIVO device.
TAK-676 + Carboplatin
Intratumoral microdose injection by the CIVO device.
Carboplatin + Paclitaxel
Intratumoral microdose injection by the CIVO device.
Carboplatin + 5-FU
Intratumoral microdose injection by the CIVO device.
TAK-676 + Carboplatin + 5-FU
Intratumoral microdose injection by the CIVO device.
TAK-676 + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel
Intratumoral microdose injection by the CIVO device.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
TAK-676
Intratumoral microdose injection by the CIVO device.
Carboplatin
Intratumoral microdose injection by the CIVO device.
5-FU
Intratumoral microdose injection by the CIVO device.
Paclitaxel
Intratumoral microdose injection by the CIVO device.
TAK-676 + Carboplatin
Intratumoral microdose injection by the CIVO device.
Carboplatin + Paclitaxel
Intratumoral microdose injection by the CIVO device.
Carboplatin + 5-FU
Intratumoral microdose injection by the CIVO device.
TAK-676 + Carboplatin + 5-FU
Intratumoral microdose injection by the CIVO device.
TAK-676 + Carboplatin + Paclitaxel
Intratumoral microdose injection by the CIVO device.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Male or female ≥ 18 years of age at Visit 1 (Screening).
3. Pathologic diagnosis of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC).
4. Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent. Voluntary written consent must be given before performance of any study related procedure not part of standard medical care, with the understanding that consent may be withdrawn by the patient at any time without prejudice to future medical care.
5. At least one lesion (primary tumor, recurrent tumor, or effaced metastatic lymph node) ≥ 2 cm in the shortest diameter that is surface accessible for CIVO injection that may be guided by ultrasound if appropriate and for which there is a planned surgical intervention. Treatment plan may include adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy, and patients should have no medical contraindication to surgery.
6. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score of 0-2.
7. Female patients who:
* Are postmenopausal for at least one year before the screening visit, OR
* Are surgically sterile, OR
* Are of childbearing potential who agree to practice a highly effective method of contraception and one additional effective (barrier) method at the same time (see examples below) from the time of signing the informed consent form (ICF) through four months after the tumor injection procedure OR agree to completely abstain from heterosexual intercourse.
Highly effective methods:
* Intrauterine device (IUD)
* Hormonal (birth control pills/oral contraceptives, injectable contraceptives, contraceptive patches, or contraceptive implants
Other effective methods (barrier methods):
* Latex condom
* Diaphragm with spermicide; Cervical cap; Sponge
* Agree to refrain from donating ova during study participation and up to four months after the tumor injection procedure.
Male patients, even if surgically sterile (i.e., status post-vasectomy), who:
* Agree to practice effective barrier contraception from the time of signing the ICF through four months after the tumor injection procedure OR agree to completely abstain from heterosexual intercourse.
* Agree to refrain from donating sperm during study participation and up to four months after the tumor injection procedure.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients who have received neoadjuvant therapy associated with the surgical intervention described in Inclusion Criterion #5.
3. Tumors near or involving critical structures for which, in the opinion of the treating clinician, injection would pose undue risk to the patient.
4. Female patients who are:
* Both lactating and breastfeeding, OR
* Have a positive β-human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) pregnancy test at screening verified by the Investigator.
5. Any uncontrolled intercurrent illness, condition, serious medical or psychiatric illness, or circumstance that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could interfere with adherence to the study's procedures or requirements, or otherwise compromise the study's objectives.
6. Patients with a history of concurrent second cancers requiring active, ongoing systemic treatment.
7. Patients with active autoimmune diseases requiring treatment or a known history of uncontrolled autoimmune disorders.
8. Patients with known HIV/AIDS with uncontrolled viral load and cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) less than 200, a known history of other relevant congenital or acquired immunodeficiencies, or known chronic hepatitis B/C.
9. Patients that have received a live vaccine within 4 weeks of the baseline/screening visit.
10. Use of any of the following ≤ 2 weeks prior to CIVO injection:
1. Chronic systemic immunosuppressive therapy or corticosteroids. Intranasal, inhaled, topical, or local corticosteroid injections (e.g., intra-articular injection), or steroids as premedication for hypersensitivity reactions (e.g., CT scan premedication) are exceptions to this criterion.
2. Biological response modifiers for treatment of active autoimmune disease.
3. Hematopoietic growth factors.
11. Patients with prior treatment with other stimulator of interferon genes (STING) agonist/antagonist and toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists, or cell therapies within 2 months of the baseline/screening visit.
12. Patients receiving concurrent systemic therapy (e.g., chemotherapy, targeted agent, or immunotherapy, etc.) or radiation therapy 4 weeks prior to screening through the planned surgical intervention.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Takeda
INDUSTRY
Presage Biosciences
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Wendy Jenkins
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Presage Biosciences Clinical Development
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
LSU Health Sciences Center - Shreveport
Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, United States
University of Cincinnati Health
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gundle KR, Deutsch GB, Goodman HJ, Pollack SM, Thompson MJ, Davis JL, Lee MY, Ramirez DC, Kerwin W, Bertout JA, Grenley MO, Sottero KHW, Beirne E, Frazier J, Dey J, Ellison M, Klinghoffer RA, Maki RG. Multiplexed Evaluation of Microdosed Antineoplastic Agents In Situ in the Tumor Microenvironment of Patients with Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Aug 1;26(15):3958-3968. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-0614. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
Klinghoffer RA, Bahrami SB, Hatton BA, Frazier JP, Moreno-Gonzalez A, Strand AD, Kerwin WS, Casalini JR, Thirstrup DJ, You S, Morris SM, Watts KL, Veiseh M, Grenley MO, Tretyak I, Dey J, Carleton M, Beirne E, Pedro KD, Ditzler SH, Girard EJ, Deckwerth TL, Bertout JA, Meleo KA, Filvaroff EH, Chopra R, Press OW, Olson JM. A technology platform to assess multiple cancer agents simultaneously within a patient's tumor. Sci Transl Med. 2015 Apr 22;7(284):284ra58. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa7489.
Frazier JP, Bertout JA, Kerwin WS, Moreno-Gonzalez A, Casalini JR, Grenley MO, Beirne E, Watts KL, Keener A, Thirstrup DJ, Tretyak I, Ditzler SH, Tripp CD, Choy K, Gillings S, Breit MN, Meleo KA, Rizzo V, Herrera CL, Perry JA, Amaravadi RK, Olson JM, Klinghoffer RA. Multidrug Analyses in Patients Distinguish Efficacious Cancer Agents Based on Both Tumor Cell Killing and Immunomodulation. Cancer Res. 2017 Jun 1;77(11):2869-2880. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0084. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
Dey J, Kerwin WS, Grenley MO, Casalini JR, Tretyak I, Ditzler SH, Thirstrup DJ, Frazier JP, Pierce DW, Carleton M, Klinghoffer RA. A Platform for Rapid, Quantitative Assessment of Multiple Drug Combinations Simultaneously in Solid Tumors In Vivo. PLoS One. 2016 Jun 30;11(6):e0158617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158617. eCollection 2016.
Moreno-Gonzalez A, Olson JM, Klinghoffer RA. Predicting responses to chemotherapy in the context that matters - the patient. Mol Cell Oncol. 2015 Jun 10;3(1):e1057315. doi: 10.1080/23723556.2015.1057315. eCollection 2016 Jan.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PBI-MST-01
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
MST01-TAK-02
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.