Group-based [ADAPT] Versus One-to-one [Usual] Occupational Therapy (Go:OT Trial)

NCT ID: NCT06058754

Last Updated: 2023-09-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

130 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-09-04

Study Completion Date

2024-12-06

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This trial aims to evaluate the ADAPT Program in terms of efficacy, process and cost-efficacy compared to usual occupational therapy (UOT) in people with decreased ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL) following chronic conditions. As both the ADAPT Program and UOT are targeted improvements in ADL ability, the primary objective of this trial is to assess equivalence between the ADAPT Program and UOT on changes in ADL ability as measured with the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: The number of people living with chronic conditions limiting the ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL) tasks is increasing. Occupational therapists are trained to deliver interventions to improve ADL ability, e.g. by adapting and adjusting daily routines and physical environments. Municipality occupational therapy (OT) interventions are usually delivered as one-to-one sessions in the client´s home. While this intervention format might be effective in improving ADL ability, a group-based intervention format might be as effective but more cost-effective and hold other secondary gains. Guided by the British Medical Research Council's guidance (MRC) on how to develop and evaluate complex interventions, the ADAPT Program, a peer-exchange group-based program, was developed, piloted, and evaluated for its functioning and feasibility in municipality settings. These studies provided initial evidence for the ADAPT Programs effectiveness in improving ADL ability and suggests gains as improved well-being. Hence, the current phase concerns a full-scale evaluation of the ADAPT Program including evaluation of effectiveness, processes and cost-effectiveness.

Material and Methods: The randomized controlled trial (RCT), initiated with an external pilot (n=12), will include 130 home dwelling persons with decreased ADL ability following chronic conditions. Participants are randomized to either ADAPT Program (experimental) or usual OT (control).

Primary outcome: Observed ADL motor ability measured with the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS).

Secondary outcomes: Observed ADL process ability measured with the AMPS; patient reported ADL task Performance and Satisfaction measured with the ADL-Interview (ADL-I, Performance and Satisfaction scores); Well-being assessed with the World Health Organisation-Five Well Being Index (WHO-5); Health-related Quality of Life assessed with the European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D).

Exploratory outcomes include patient reported changes, using transition scales to evaluate participants´ experience of a) changed ADL task performance and satisfaction, b) changed problem-solving skills, c) changed quality of life, d) changed global health, e) changed needs for assistance. Finally, participants are to rate their overall experience of the allocated occupational therapy intervention.

Data collection: Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness data are collected at baseline and post intervention i.e., 3-months (week 12) and 6-months (week 26) from baseline. Costs will be estimated based on micro costing and national registries. Effects will be Quality Adjusted Life Years and changes in AMPS ADL motor ability. Process evaluation data will be collected using registration forms and semi-structured qualitative interviews.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Condition Chronic Disease Chronic Conditions, Multiple

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

A single-center, double-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, equivalence 6-months follow-up study with external pilot, effect, process and economic evaluations
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
Participants are informed that they will be allocated to one of two occupational therapy intervention programs that both aims to improve ADL ability, but overall primarily differ in terms of their format i.e. a group-based versus a one-to-one intervention program format. Participants are not informed, which of the two types of formats that are the new experimental intervention format (ADAPT) nor control (UOT). Baseline assessments are conducted prior to randomization by a local employed occupational therapists, who is instructed not to reveal which intervention that is the new experimental intervention. The post and follow-up assessors, a research occupational therapy assistant employed at the Parker Institute, is also instructed not to disclose which intervention that is the new experimental one. Finally, all participants are reminded not to disclose any details, that may provide the outcome assessors with insights regarding their allocated study arm.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ADAPT Program

The ADAPT Program is a structured and individualized group-based program

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

The ADAPT Program

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The ADAPT Program is a structured and individualized 10-week group-based program, in which two occupational therapists teach groups of people, the skills of problem-solving more efficiently as means to overcome ADL task performance problems. The ADAPT Program 3.0 includes 2 individual two-hour sessions (sessions 1 and 10) conducted in the clients homes and eight two-hour group-based sessions (sessions 2-9). Moreover, two booster sessions (sessions 11 and 12) are delivered to support sustainable gains after termination of the 10-week ADAPT Program 3.0

Usual Occupational Therapy (UOT)

UOT is delivered by one occupational therapist in the clients homes or local environments. .

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

UOT

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

UOT is delivered by one occupational therapist. Sessions are individualised and focused on improving ADL ability e.g. by practicing the performance of ADL task or adjusting home environments. UOT typically includes 7 one-to-one sessions of 60 minutes, delivered over a 10-week period in the clients´ homes. The dose is however not fixed but based on the occupational therapists´ clinical judgement in collaboration with the individual client

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

The ADAPT Program

The ADAPT Program is a structured and individualized 10-week group-based program, in which two occupational therapists teach groups of people, the skills of problem-solving more efficiently as means to overcome ADL task performance problems. The ADAPT Program 3.0 includes 2 individual two-hour sessions (sessions 1 and 10) conducted in the clients homes and eight two-hour group-based sessions (sessions 2-9). Moreover, two booster sessions (sessions 11 and 12) are delivered to support sustainable gains after termination of the 10-week ADAPT Program 3.0

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

UOT

UOT is delivered by one occupational therapist. Sessions are individualised and focused on improving ADL ability e.g. by practicing the performance of ADL task or adjusting home environments. UOT typically includes 7 one-to-one sessions of 60 minutes, delivered over a 10-week period in the clients´ homes. The dose is however not fixed but based on the occupational therapists´ clinical judgement in collaboration with the individual client

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Adaptation Compensatory occupational therapy group-based peer-exchange problem-solving Usual occupational therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ≥ one year since medical diagnosed with one or more chronic conditions.
* Lives in own home.
* Experience ADL task performance problems.
* Show ADL motor ability measures \<1.50 logits on the AMPS ADL motor skill scale (indicate increased effort during ADL task performance).
* Communicate independently and relevantly orally and in writing.
* Willing and interested in attending occupational therapy interventions focused on improving ADL task performance.

Exclusion Criteria

* ADL process ability measures \<0.00 indicating that the person is unlikely to profit from educational programs focused on using adaptational strategies.
* Personal ADL (PADL) problems with acute need for help.
* Mental illness and/or other acute (\<3 months) conditions effecting ADL task performance significantly.
* Significant communication barriers (significant cognitive deficits, -aphasia, -hearing loss, -dyslexia and/or -language barriers).
* Known substance abuse.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rehabilitation Center Rødovre Municipality (Genoptræning Rødovre Kommune)

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Den Kommunale Kvalitetsudviklingspulje

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Lundbeckpuljen

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Oak Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Tværspuljen

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Parker Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Eva Ejlersen Wæhrens

Senior researcher, Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Cecilie von Bülow, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Parker Research Institute, Department of Rheumatology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Frederiksberg, Denmark

Frederiksberg, , Denmark

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Cecilie von Bülow, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Eva Wæhrens, Professor

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Cecilie von Bülow

Role: primary

Eva Wæhrens

Role: backup

38 16 41 66

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Parker Institute,

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The BRIDGE Rehabilitation Trial
NCT03102814 COMPLETED NA