Relation Between Venetoclax Plasma Concentration and Remission in Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (PREDICLAX)
NCT ID: NCT06045819
Last Updated: 2025-02-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-04-08
2026-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypothesis: To compare the mean residual venetoclax plasma concentrations obtained in patients who went into complete composite remission versus those who did not go into remission at the end of the first cycle of venetoclax + azacitidine treatment.
Method: According to the French law, this is a multicenter, non-comparative, open-label, single-arm, interventional study with minimal risks and constraints. Selection, information and inclusion will concern adult patients (≥60 years) with a confirmed diagnosis of AML according to ELN 2022 guidelines. Included patients will be treated as standard care with a combination of venetoclax+azacitidine. This research protocol will not modify their usual care.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Plasma Dosage of Venetoclax in the Fup of AML Patients Treated With Aza + Ven
NCT06030089
Study of the Relationship Between the Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Pharmacodynamics of Venetoclax in Patients With Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia
NCT07243483
Venetoclax-Navitoclax With Cladribine-based Salvage Therapy in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT06007911
Correlation of Venetoclax Plasma Concentrations With Toxicity of Hypometilating Agents and Venetoclax Combination for Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients in Remission.
NCT07254312
Venetoclax and Decitabine in Treating Participants With Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Relapsed High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome
NCT03404193
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients with composite complete remission
Patients in composite complete remission following the first cycle of venetoclax (400 mg/day, orally, after a ramp-up phase of the first 3 days) + azacytidine (75mg/m²,intravenous, at the start of each cycle from day 1 to day 7)
Blood sampling for venetoclax drug dosage (venous puncture)
8 blood samples for venetoclax and azole antifungal drugs identification and dosage will be taken by venous and capillary punctures throughout management of patients
Patients without composite complete remission
Patients not in composite complete remission following the first cycle of venetoclax (400 mg/day, orally, after a ramp-up phase of the first 3 days) + azacytidine (75mg/m²,intravenous, at the start of each cycle from day 1 to day 7)
Blood sampling for venetoclax drug dosage (venous puncture)
8 blood samples for venetoclax and azole antifungal drugs identification and dosage will be taken by venous and capillary punctures throughout management of patients
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Blood sampling for venetoclax drug dosage (venous puncture)
8 blood samples for venetoclax and azole antifungal drugs identification and dosage will be taken by venous and capillary punctures throughout management of patients
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Subject must be ineligible for standard cytarabine and anthracycline induction therapy according to the following criteria:
* Subject aged ≥ 75 years.
* OR subject aged between 60 and 74 with at least one of the following comorbidities:
* ECOG performance status: of 2 or 3.
* cardiac history: heart failure requiring treatment, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 50%, chronic stable angina.
* carbon monoxide diffusion capacity ≤ 65% or forced expiratory volume in one second ≤ 65%.
* creatinine clearance between 30 and 45 mL/min/m².
* liver damage (not related to AML) with total bilirubin between 1.5 and 3 × upper normal limit.
* any other comorbidity deemed by the physician to be incompatible with standard induction chemotherapy.
3. Patients are eligible for the recommended standard treatment, i.e. a combination of venetoclax and a hypomethylating agent.
4. Subjects must voluntarily sign and date an informed consent form authorized by the relevant authorities.
5. The participation of the subject in another interventional study not interfering with the pathophysiological, pharmacological and clinical rationale of this protocol is possible.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Subject has already received anticancer treatment (drugs, surgery, radiotherapy) for AML, hematological malignancy or malignant cancer (within the last 2 years).
3. Subjects with AML with central nervous system involvement or promyelocytic type (AML-M3).
4. Subject to an uncontrolled intercurrent disease such as:
* infection (viral, bacterial or fungal) requiring treatment;
* symptomatic congestive heart failure;
* unstable angina pectoris
* cardiac arrhythmia
* psychiatric illness or drug addiction that would limit compliance with study requirements (risk of treatment non-adherence or low venous capital).
5. Documented hypersensitivity to the drugs used to treat the subject.
6. Subject has been exposed to potent CYP450 inducers or inhibitors (including grapefruit, Seville oranges) within 7 days prior to treatment initiation.
60 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Caen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Pierre-Marie Morice, PharmD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Teaching Hospital of Caen
Sylvain Chantepie, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Teaching Hospital of Caen
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU de Caen
Caen, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Sylvain Chantepie, MD
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2023-A01909-36
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.