Hill-grade Knowledge Via Integrated Neural-network for Gastroscopy
NCT ID: NCT06040723
Last Updated: 2024-05-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
195 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-10-10
2023-12-22
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Near Focus NBI-Driven Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis of Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease
NCT04268719
Thresholds of Straight Leg Raise Maneuver During High-Resolution-Manometry
NCT04813029
Prospective Evaluation of PH-impedance Tracings According to the Wingate Consensus, and Influence on GERD Classification According to the Lyon Consensus
NCT06084572
Can We Predict Who Has Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)?
NCT01204931
Prevalence of Hiatus Hernia in Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease Patients Underwent Upper Endoscopy
NCT06155851
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The primary goal of this study is to compare the accuracy in determining the Hill classification during gastroscopy between an artificial intelligence (AI) based system and physicians performing the examination. Secondary outcomes include evaluation of the per-class accuracy and other statistical measures such as precision, recall and f1 score.
Study Design:
Single center, endoscopist blinded study. The model considered in a previous study achieved a mean accuracy of 88%. All participants initially attended a lecture serving as a refresher regarding the Hill classification. Subsequently, physicians were asked to provide the Hill classification for test images expert annotated images depicting different Hill grades, achieving mean accuracy of 72%. Thus 127 paired measurements are required. Taking patient drop-out into consideration, at least 159 patients need to be recruited. Upon examination of the flap-valve during endoscopy, the physician is required to store an image of the flap-valve during retroflexion, which is part of the standard procedure, based on which they determine the Hill classification. The prediction of the AI model on this image is considered the model output and is considered the model's output. A group of three expert endoscopists determines the Hill classification for each image, based on majority vote, which is treated as the gold standard.
AI setup and limitations:
There are no limitations caused by the AI. The method performs a frame-by-frame analysis of the recording. These images are parsed from the AI based system in order to obtain predictions. The only interactions required with the method is a button press that initiates the examination recording process and a second button press to terminate the recording. This is performed at the beginning and end of the examination respectively. The model used in this study is an updated version of the model reported in a preliminary study, that has been trained with more data together with an auxiliary output for predicting if the Hill classification is relevant to the shown image.
Study population:
All adult patients appointed for gastroscopy that do not match the exclusion criteria will be asked for informed consent. Exclusion criteria include previous surgical interventions or altered anatomy that prevents the proper examination of the flap valve, examinations where the flap-valve is not inspected, and examinations where the expert committee does not produce a majority vote.
Intervention:
The physician performs the examination as usual. Upon inspection of the flap valve, the physician captures an image of the examination, as usual, and gives their assessment of the Hill grade. The output of the model for the same image is considered the model prediction. The physician is blinded to the model's prediction.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental: Intervention arm
All patients within the study are included in the intervention arm: The Hill classification is determined by the physician and the AI method.
EndoMind
The EndoMind system is equipped with an AI model for predicting the Hill grade during gastroscopy.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
EndoMind
The EndoMind system is equipped with an AI model for predicting the Hill grade during gastroscopy.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Scheduled gastroscopy
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous surgical interventions or altered anatomy that prevents the proper examination of the flap valve
* Flap-valve not inspected
Data Level:
* Image during flap-valve inspection not stored
* Expert committee not resulting in a majority vote
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Wuerzburg University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kafetzis I, Sodmann P, Herghelegiu BE, Brand M, Zoller WG, Seyfried F, Fuchs KH, Meining A, Hann A. Prospective Evaluation of Real-Time Artificial Intelligence for the Hill Classification of the Gastroesophageal Junction. United European Gastroenterol J. 2025 Mar;13(2):240-246. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12721. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AI04
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.