Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
PHASE4
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-10-01
2030-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Paediatric Arteriopathy Steroid Aspirin Project
NCT03249844
Methylprednisolone for Stroke With Large Infarct Core and Post-stroke Lymphocytopenia
NCT07202143
Methylprednisolone Sodium Succinate With Endovascular ThRombectomy for Large Ischemic STroke
NCT07175649
Methylprednisolone Adjunctive to Endovascular Thrombectomy for Stroke
NCT06360458
TNK-tPA Evaluation for Minor Ischemic Stroke With Proven Occlusion
NCT01654445
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Europeans have begun the PASTA (Paediatric Arteriopathy STeroid Aspirin) trial (PI Steinlin): a "gold-standard" RCT to test the efficacy of corticosteroids for FCA. A 2018 survey of pediatric stroke investigators (participating in the NIH-funded Vascular effects of Infection in Pediatric Stroke, VIPS II, cohort study) revealed discomfort with randomization to "no steroids" as the majority now treat FCA with corticosteroids. However, despite attitudes favoring their use, corticosteroids were given to only 36% of 55 children with suspected FCA in the VIPS II cohort and (when given) were started a median of 3 days post-stroke (IQR 1.5, 6) (unpublished preliminary data). This incongruity reflects diagnostic uncertainty at stroke baseline: the characteristic arteriopathy evolution is needed for definitive diagnosis of FCA, and ≈1 in 5 children with suspected FCA at baseline have an alternate diagnosis. Hence, the pressing clinical question is: Should we treat all children with suspected FCA immediately or wait and treat only the subset that demonstrate disease progression?
Early treatment has the potential advantage of preventing FCA progression, but the disadvantage of over treatment of those with alternate diagnoses. With a comparative effectiveness approach, the FOCAS trial will compare these two treatment approaches. FOCAS will also collect the steroid treatment safety data needed to guide clinical decisions.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm A
Treat all children with suspected FCA with corticosteroids as soon as the diagnosis is made.
methylprednisolone, prednisolone, prednisone
Any generic or brand-name methylprednisolone at the appropriate dose may be used. Likewise, any generic or brand-name prednisolone, or prednisone, at the appropriate dose may be used.
Arm B
Treat only the subset of children that develop evidence of FCA disease progression.
methylprednisolone, prednisolone, prednisone
Any generic or brand-name methylprednisolone at the appropriate dose may be used. Likewise, any generic or brand-name prednisolone, or prednisone, at the appropriate dose may be used.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
methylprednisolone, prednisolone, prednisone
Any generic or brand-name methylprednisolone at the appropriate dose may be used. Likewise, any generic or brand-name prednisolone, or prednisone, at the appropriate dose may be used.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Acute arterial ischemic stroke (AIS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) in prior 4 days (96 hours).
1. AIS definition: neurological deficit with acute onset (including seizures) and acute infarct(s) corresponding to arterial territory(ies) on brain imaging.
2. TIA definition: neurological deficit with acute onset (not including seizures) consistent with ischemia of an arterial territory(ies) but without acute infarction on brain imaging.
a. Baseline imaging findings consistent with FCA: i. unilateral focal irregularity, banding, stenosis, wall thickening/enhancement, or occlusion of the distal internal carotid artery (ICA) and/or its proximal branches (A1, M1, posterior communicating artery, proximal PCA), OR ii. unilateral infarction in the territory of the lenticulostriate arteries with normal MRA.
b. Ability to return at 1-month (±7 days) post-stroke for an MRI/MRA (non-contrast) on a scanner of the same magnet strength as baseline MRI/MRA.\*
4. Consent to study procedures.
* A repeat baseline MRI/MRA can be performed as a research scan within 24 hours of enrollment if needed to meet this requirement.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Another identified cause of stroke/TIA, other than FCA. (Intracranial dissection is considered a subtype of FCA and will be included if the patient is not predisposed to dissection for the reasons listed below.)
3. Presence of childhood stroke risk factors (known to be present at the time of enrollment):
1. Risk factors for arterial dissection: connective tissue disorder (e.g., Ehlers-Danlos type IV, Marfan syndrome, osteogenesis imperfect); severe head or neck trauma in the two weeks preceding AIS/TIA (defined as skull or cervical fracture, or an ICU admission for trauma).
2. Risk factors for moyamoya: genetic disorder or syndrome that predisposes to moyamoya (e.g., trisomy 21, neurofibromatosis type 1, tuberous sclerosis, sickle cell anemia, MOPD type II, PHACE syndrome); prior cranial radiation therapy.
3. Risk factors for secondary vasculitis or vasospasm: acute meningitis, systemic lupus erythematosus or other autoimmune disorder that can cause vasculitis, recent cocaine/amphetamine use (prior 7 days), recent subarachnoid hemorrhage (prior 14 days).
4. Risk factors for cardioembolism: complex congenital heart disease; recent cardiac surgery or catheterization (prior week); endocarditis or other cardiac valve disease with vegetations; right-to-left cardiac shunting lesion with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or a known thrombophilia.
1. Baseline parenchymal imaging demonstrating remote or bilateral infarcts
2. Vascular imaging demonstrating bilateral arteriopathy or moyamoya collaterals
5. Contraindication to corticosteroid therapy (e.g., baseline immunosuppression, significant infection, etc.) as determined by the treating physicians.
6. Current or recent (within prior week) treatment with corticosteroids.
7. Pregnant, post-partum (within 6 months of childbirth), or nursing.
1 Year
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Cincinnati
OTHER
Medical University of South Carolina
OTHER
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
OTHER
University of Colorado, Denver
OTHER
University of Iowa
OTHER
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
NIH
American Heart Association
OTHER
University of California, San Francisco
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Heather J Fullerton, MD, MAS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, San Francisco
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wintermark M, Hills NK, DeVeber GA, Barkovich AJ, Bernard TJ, Friedman NR, Mackay MT, Kirton A, Zhu G, Leiva-Salinas C, Hou Q, Fullerton HJ; VIPS Investigators. Clinical and Imaging Characteristics of Arteriopathy Subtypes in Children with Arterial Ischemic Stroke: Results of the VIPS Study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Nov;38(11):2172-2179. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5376. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
Fullerton HJ, Stence N, Hills NK, Jiang B, Amlie-Lefond C, Bernard TJ, Friedman NR, Ichord R, Mackay MT, Rafay MF, Chabrier S, Steinlin M, Elkind MSV, deVeber GA, Wintermark M; VIPS Investigators. Focal Cerebral Arteriopathy of Childhood: Novel Severity Score and Natural History. Stroke. 2018 Nov;49(11):2590-2596. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021556.
Elkind MS, Hills NK, Glaser CA, Lo WD, Amlie-Lefond C, Dlamini N, Kneen R, Hod EA, Wintermark M, deVeber GA, Fullerton HJ; VIPS Investigators*. Herpesvirus Infections and Childhood Arterial Ischemic Stroke: Results of the VIPS Study. Circulation. 2016 Feb 23;133(8):732-41. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018595. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
Steinlin M, Bigi S, Stojanovski B, Gajera J, Regenyi M, El-Koussy M, Mackay MT; Swiss NeuroPediatric Stroke Registry. Focal Cerebral Arteriopathy: Do Steroids Improve Outcome? Stroke. 2017 Sep;48(9):2375-2382. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016818. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
Steinlin M, O'callaghan F, Mackay MT. Planning interventional trials in childhood arterial ischaemic stroke using a Delphi consensus process. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017 Jul;59(7):713-718. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13393. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
Fullerton HJ, Hills NK, Elkind MS, Dowling MM, Wintermark M, Glaser CA, Tan M, Rivkin MJ, Titomanlio L, Barkovich AJ, deVeber GA; VIPS Investigators. Infection, vaccination, and childhood arterial ischemic stroke: Results of the VIPS study. Neurology. 2015 Oct 27;85(17):1459-66. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002065. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
Lanthier S, Armstrong D, Domi T, deVeber G. Post-varicella arteriopathy of childhood: natural history of vascular stenosis. Neurology. 2005 Feb 22;64(4):660-3. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000151851.66154.27.
Chabrier S, Rodesch G, Lasjaunias P, Tardieu M, Landrieu P, Sebire G. Transient cerebral arteriopathy: a disorder recognized by serial angiograms in children with stroke. J Child Neurol. 1998 Jan;13(1):27-32. doi: 10.1177/088307389801300105.
Braun KP, Bulder MM, Chabrier S, Kirkham FJ, Uiterwaal CS, Tardieu M, Sebire G. The course and outcome of unilateral intracranial arteriopathy in 79 children with ischaemic stroke. Brain. 2009 Feb;132(Pt 2):544-57. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn313. Epub 2008 Nov 27.
Slavova N, Fullerton HJ, Hills NK, Breiding PS, Mackay MT, Steinlin M. Validation of the focal cerebral arteriopathy severity score (FCASS) in a Swiss cohort: Correlation with infarct volume and outcome. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2020 Sep;28:58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2020.07.015. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
Lo WD, Ichord RN, Dowling MM, Rafay M, Templeton J, Halperin A, Smith SE, Licht DJ, Moharir M, Askalan R, Deveber G; International Pediatric Stroke Study (IPSS) Investigators. The Pediatric Stroke Recurrence and Recovery Questionnaire: validation in a prospective cohort. Neurology. 2012 Aug 28;79(9):864-70. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318266fc9a. Epub 2012 Aug 15.
Schechter T, Kirton A, Laughlin S, Pontigon AM, Finkelstein Y, MacGregor D, Chan A, deVeber G, Brandao LR. Safety of anticoagulants in children with arterial ischemic stroke. Blood. 2012 Jan 26;119(4):949-56. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-06-361535. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
Fullerton HJ, Hills NK, Chen H, Dlamini N, Stence NV, Wintermark M; VIPS II Investigators. Changing Management of Focal Cerebral Arteriopathy of Childhood From 2010 to 2022. Stroke. 2025 Jun;56(6):1460-1468. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.050550. Epub 2025 May 12.
Other Identifiers
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.