Development of a Clinical Screening, Diagnostic and Evaluation Tool for Patients With Lower Limb Lymphedema: Aim 4

NCT ID: NCT06038864

Last Updated: 2024-09-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-04-01

Study Completion Date

2025-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Research investigating measurement properties for evaluating the decongestive treatment effect on different edema characteristics (e.g. water volume, hardness of the skin, water content,..) at the level of the lower limbs is missing. Information about the clinical relevant change criteria after treatment for nearly all these edema characteristics, is not present and requires investigation.

To assess the merits of each treatment in a reproducible manner, a reliable way of measuring limb volume and other edema characteristics must be established, as the evaluation of treatment effects without appropriate tools might lead to biased treatment effects.

First of all, in clinical practice, it is of utmost importance to know which edema characteristics need to be evaluated in order to assess the clinical evolution of a patient with lymphedema during and after treatment. Secondly, in order to draw proper conclusions about the treatment effect, it is necessary that to know from which criterion (or cut-off value) one can speak of a real clinical change for a certain lymphedema characteristic. Given that the edema characteristics that are most responsive to treatment and their corresponding criteria for clinically significant and relevant changes at the lower limbs have never been investigated before, the need for this research is high.

Therefore, the research questions in this study are: Which measurement tool(s) are able to detect clinically relevant changes in the lymphedema characteristics after the intensive treatment and during the maintenance treatment? When can a clinician speak of a clinically relevant change?

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lower Limb Lymphedema

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intensive group

Patients with lower limb lymphoedema planned for intensive treatment

2 clinical evaluations with 1 month in between

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Patients will be evaluated twice with all evaluation methods selected by the international expert group (cfr. aim 1) showing sufficient reliability and feasibility in the patient group with LLL from aim 1

Maintenance group

Patients with stable lower limb lymphoedema who are in the maintenance phase (at least 3 months)

2 clinical evaluations with 1 month in between

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Patients will be evaluated twice with all evaluation methods selected by the international expert group (cfr. aim 1) showing sufficient reliability and feasibility in the patient group with LLL from aim 1

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

2 clinical evaluations with 1 month in between

Patients will be evaluated twice with all evaluation methods selected by the international expert group (cfr. aim 1) showing sufficient reliability and feasibility in the patient group with LLL from aim 1

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Intensive treatment group

* Unilateral or bilateral, primary or secondary LLL
* No active metastases
* If cancer-related lymphedema, time interval since surgery/ radiotherapy/ chemotherapy is ≥3 months
* Objective diagnosis of lymphedema: ≥ 5% volume difference OR ≥ 2 minor/ 1 major criteria on lymphoscintigraphy OR presence of ICG dermal backflow
* Age ≥ 18 years
* Able to read, understand and speak Dutch
* Planned to start with intensive decongestive lymphatic therapy at one or both legs
* Maintenance treatment group

* But: instead of patients planned to start with intensive lymphatic therapy, patients of this group should have ended their intensive treatment phase at least 3 months ago (= currently receiving maintenance decongestive lymphatic therapy)

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant participants
* Presence of chronic venous insufficiency C4, C5, C6; deep venous thrombosis; post-thrombotic syndrome
* Presence of skin infections of wounds at the level of the lower limbs at the moment of inclusion
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Nij Smellinghe Hospital Drachten

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

KU Leuven

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Tessa De Vrieze

Principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tessa De Vrieze, Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

KU Leuven

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospitals of Leuven

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status RECRUITING

Nij Smellinghe Hospital

Drachten, , Netherlands

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium Netherlands

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Tessa De Vrieze, Dr.

Role: CONTACT

003216345006

Nele Devoogdt, Prof. Dr.

Role: CONTACT

0032 16 342515

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Tessa De Vrieze, Dr.

Role: primary

003216345006

Ad Hendrickx, PhD

Role: primary

Robert Damstra, PhD

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

s66033-aim4

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Intra Articular Ankle Fractures
NCT05465382 TERMINATED NA