Qualitative Study of Surgeons With Prospective Patient Follow-up
NCT ID: NCT06032676
Last Updated: 2024-04-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
75 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-01-01
2028-10-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Deciding which babies will benefit from surgery is challenging and there are no objective methods used to do this currently. Surgeons must weigh up the risks and benefits of performing major surgery on a tiny baby in the knowledge that surgery itself may cause harm. This uncertainty causes delays in performing surgery. Those that have a delay are more likely to have a poor outcome.
In order to improve these unfavourable outcomes it is essential to understand and define current practice in detail (i.e. indications and timing for surgery) and understand how this may be associated with outcome. These outcomes are both short term, including mortality and ability to tolerate enteral nutrition, and long term which include neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of life.
To do this the investigators will undertake a multicentre mixed methods study with qualitative interview of consultant paediatric surgeons shortly after making a decision to operate, or not, on a baby with NEC. The investigators will then take consent from the parents/guardian of the infant to follow-up their clinical outcomes using data linkage to routinely collected data, within the national neonatal research database. Outcomes of interest include survival, feeding outcomes, further surgical procedures and neurodevelopment at 2 years.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Incidence, Risk Factors, Severity and Prognosis of Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Turkey
NCT04344639
Risk Factors for Poor Prognosis in Neonatal Necrotizing Enterocolitis
NCT07249697
Observational Study of Surgical Treatment of Necrotizing Enterocolotis
NCT01223261
Analysis of Integrated Clinical, Laboratory and Prognostic Data of Neonates With Necrotizing Enterocolitis
NCT07207915
Risk Factors of Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Premature Newborns
NCT04719546
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
About a quarter of babies will require surgery due to bowel perforation, suspected necrotic bowel or failure to improve with intensive care treatment alone. Most commonly, ischaemic, non-viable gut is found at laparotomy and hence removed. In 1-in-20 surgical procedures the extent of the non-viable gut is so great that survival is not possible.
Surgical practice, including decision-making, in NEC has been previously shown to vary from surgeon to surgeon with no set criteria for when an infant is no longer responding to medical treatment and should have surgery. It can be particularly challenging given that babies with the disease are of extreme prematurity and some weigh as little as 500 grams. There is a real risk of causing harm during surgery hence it is essential that the benefits outweigh the risk. Unfortunately short and long-term outcomes for surgical NEC are poor including mortality in 35% following surgery and 59% of survivors experience neurodevelopmental problems. Recent evidence suggests that earlier surgery for NEC is beneficial and is associated with better outcomes than delayed surgery. Additionally, 20% of neonates with NEC die before surgery which is potentially avoidable with more effective identification of the need for surgery.
In order to improve these unfavourable outcomes it is essential to understand and define current practice in detail (i.e. indications and timing for surgery) and understand how this may be associated with outcome. These outcomes are both short term, including mortality and ability to tolerate enteral nutrition, and long term which include neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of life.
This prospective mixed methods study is entirely observation and involves no intervention. Inclusion in the study is on the basis of fully informed consent.
Study flow is as follows:
1. Initial surgeon interview - After the site setup, all consultant paediatric surgeons that treat infants with NEC will be invited to participate and provided with a participant information sheet along with a consent form. A baseline interview will be conducted with each participating surgeon via telephone based on hypothetical patients. The interview will follow a semi-structured guide. The interview will be recorded for transcription purposes. Thematic analysis will then be undertaken.
2. Clinical Review of Infants with NEC by Consultant Surgeon - Infants will be eligible for inclusion if they have confirmed NEC or their most likely diagnosis is NEC, and are reviewed by a consultant surgeon for consideration of surgery at a study site. The local clinical team or research team will notify the study coordinator that this review has taken place.
3. Qualitative surgeon interview about Review and Decision to Operate or Not - Qualitative interviews will be conducted via telephone as soon as possible after the clinical review by the surgeon. Interviews will be semi-structured, lasting approximately 10 minutes, and follow a topic guide. The interview will be recorded for transcription purposes. Thematic analysis will then be undertaken.
4. Parent Consent and Data Collection - Following the qualitative interview of the surgeon, the parents of the infant who underwent clinical review will be approached for consent to record their infant's details and parental contact information. This process will occur prior to hospital discharge. Data will be collected to allow linkage to the National Neonatal Research Database (NNRD) which routinely collects data on infants admitted to neonatal units nationally.
5. Initial Follow-up - 52 Weeks Corrected Gestational Age - Seven months after the end of data collection (1st May 2025), a list of patients using BadgerNet numbers and dates of birth, will be securely sent to the National Neonatal Research Database (NNRD) via NHS.net email in order to identify the infants on the NNRD. The requested data for each infant will be censored at 52 weeks corrected gestational age. The analysis will focus on identifying associations between the thematic interview analysis and the outcomes of the infants. These groups based on outcome are:
* Survival and non survival
* Survival and non-survival or parental nutrition dependence at discharge
* Surgery after initial surgical review and continued medical management
6. Further Follow-up - 2 Years of Age - the NNRD will be interrogated again on 1st January 2027 using the same procedures used during the initial follow-up. Additional outcomes of interest at this stage are two year outcome assessment date, developmental outcomes and cerebral palsy diagnosis. Associations between these outcomes and themes identified during surgeon interview will again be investigated.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Infants with necrotising enterocolitis reviewed by a surgeon
Infant with suspected or confirmed NEC undergoing review by surgeon, regardless of outcome of that review (i.e. surgery indicated or not)
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
3. Lack of consent from parents to follow-up outcomes of infant.
4 Months
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nigel J Hall
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Southampton
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NIHR
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
RHM CHI1209
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.