Observational Study of Surgical Treatment of Necrotizing Enterocolotis
NCT ID: NCT01223261
Last Updated: 2019-03-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
156 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2001-03-31
2004-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Two Surgical Treatments for Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Human Infants
NCT00252681
Risk Factors for Poor Prognosis in Neonatal Necrotizing Enterocolitis
NCT07249697
RIC-NEC Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT05279664
Analysis of Integrated Clinical, Laboratory and Prognostic Data of Neonates With Necrotizing Enterocolitis
NCT07207915
Qualitative Study of Surgeons With Prospective Patient Follow-up
NCT06032676
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Surgical options for NEC and IP include two possible procedures: peritoneal drainage, in which a tube is placed in the abdominal cavity through a small incision for fluid to drain out; or laparotomy, in which an incision is made in the abdomen and diseased intestine is removed. Infants treated with an initial drainage sometimes go on to need a laparotomy. Most surgeons now believe that a diagnosis of the intestinal perforation (IP) may actually be either true NEC or a different and distinct pathology, termed isolated intestinal perforation. The ability to distinguish these 2 conditions preoperatively, based on perinatal characteristics, physical examination findings, and findings on abdominal plain film imaging, remains unknown. If these 2 entities can be distinguished preoperatively, the intervention chosen and outcomes may be different. From the two available surgical options, tt is not known whether initial laparotomy or peritoneal drain placement is more effective for either NEC or IP.
This study was a prospective, multicenter observational study to describe the surgical outcomes (mortality, post-operative intestinal stricture, intra-abdominal abscess formation, etc.) in ELBW infants with either NEC or IP who underwent initial laparotomy or peritoneal drainage. We also evaluated the ability of surgeons to distinguish NEC and IP pre-operatively and the relevance of this distinction on outcome. Finally, an analysis of the impact of extent of intestinal involvement with NEC on outcome measures is reported.
All ELBW infants born at participating NRN centers were screened for the presence of NEC or IP that was thought by the pediatric surgeon and neonatologist to require surgical intervention. Data were collected enrolled infants, including: intraoperative findings recorded by the surgeon and specific post-operative complications.
Neurodevelopmental examinations were conducted on surviving infants at 18-22 months corrected age.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Sage III NEC or isolated intestinal perforation
* Pediatric surgeon decision to perform surgery for suspected NEC or IP
Exclusion Criteria
6 Weeks
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Center for Research Resources (NCRR)
NIH
NICHD Neonatal Research Network
NETWORK
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Martin L. Blakely, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Waldemar A. Carlo, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Alabama at Birmingham
William Oh, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Brown University, Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island
Avroy A. Fanaroff, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Case Western Reserve University, Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital
Edward F. Donovan, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
Barbara J. Stoll, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Emory University
Charles R. Bauer, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Miami
James A. Lemons, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Indiana University
David K. Stevenson, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Stanford University
Abbot R. Laptook, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Texas
Seetha Shankaran, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Wayne State University
Richard A. Ehrenkranz, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Yale University
Ronald N. Goldberg, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Duke University
T. Michael O'Shea, MD MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Wake Forest University
Dale L. Phelps, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Rochester
Neil N. Finer, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, San Diego
W. Kenneth Poole, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
RTI International
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Stanford University
Palo Alto, California, United States
University of California at San Diego
San Diego, California, United States
Yale University
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
University of Miami
Miami, Florida, United States
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Indiana University
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Wayne State University
Detroit, Michigan, United States
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, United States
Wake Forest University
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
RTI International
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Cincinnati Children's Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Case Western Reserve University, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Brown University, Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas
Dallas, Texas, United States
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Blakely ML, Lally KP, McDonald S, Brown RL, Barnhart DC, Ricketts RR, Thompson WR, Scherer LR, Klein MD, Letton RW, Chwals WJ, Touloukian RJ, Kurkchubasche AG, Skinner MA, Moss RL, Hilfiker ML; NEC Subcommittee of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Postoperative outcomes of extremely low birth-weight infants with necrotizing enterocolitis or isolated intestinal perforation: a prospective cohort study by the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Ann Surg. 2005 Jun;241(6):984-9; discussion 989-94. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000164181.67862.7f.
Blakely ML, Tyson JE, Lally KP, McDonald S, Stoll BJ, Stevenson DK, Poole WK, Jobe AH, Wright LL, Higgins RD; NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Laparotomy versus peritoneal drainage for necrotizing enterocolitis or isolated intestinal perforation in extremely low birth weight infants: outcomes through 18 months adjusted age. Pediatrics. 2006 Apr;117(4):e680-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1273. Epub 2006 Mar 20.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
NICHD Neonatal Research Network
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NICHD-NRN-0027
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.