Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
EARLY_PHASE1
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-10-25
2024-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Identifying Treatments to Motivate Smokers to Quit
NCT01122238
Human Laboratory Study of the Effects of Nicotine Product Claims on Appeal, Perceptions, and Use Behavior
NCT06192316
Behavioral Activation Therapy and Nicotine Replacement Therapy in Increasing Smoking Cessation
NCT02697227
Behavioral Activation for Smoking Cessation and the Prevention of Post-Cessation Weight Gain
NCT02906787
A Novel Treatment to Boost Quit Attempts and Cessation Among Unmotivated Smokers
NCT00706979
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Previous studies suggest that Pavlovian bias is a universal phenomenon, but that some individuals are better at overcoming it. Nicotine has been shown to make individuals more sensitive to cues that predict loss and reward. Therefore, it is hypothesized that nicotine will increase individuals' existing Pavlovian bias levels.
Moreover, understanding whether nicotine indeed does impact Pavlovian bias may provide insight into ways in which this bias affects nicotine addiction. For example, nicotine use commonly coexists with other substance use behaviors. If nicotine acutely increases Pavlovian bias, this mechanism could partially explain the general increase of impulsive behaviors among nicotine users.
Purpose/Objectives/Aims/Research Questions The primary aim is to explore the effects of acute nicotine administration on Pavlovian bias. After showing eligibility to take part in the study, participants will come to the lab twice, each after a (self-reported) 10-hour abstinence from nicotine. After completing assessments of nicotine withdrawal and nicotine tolerance, participants will complete a standardized vaping bout, either with a vape with nicotine ("on-nicotine") or a denicotinized one ("off-nicotine"). Although the exact dose of inhaled nicotine depends on the particular puff topography of participants, the standardized vape protocol is designed to deliver approximately 2mg of nicotine. Participants will be encouraged to stop if they feel they are on the verge of having any negative nicotine response (e.g., feeling some nausea). Pavlovian bias will then be assessed via performance on a version of the Go/No-Go task. Specifically, the investigators will record participants' response accuracy on each of the four trials: go-to-win-reward, no-go-to-win-reward, go-to-avoid-losing, and no-go-to-avoid-losing. Finally, participants will complete a measure of their working memory capacity. The researchers will compare performance on the task across the two conditions within each participant: on- and off- nicotine, after controlling for nicotine withdrawal and nicotine tolerance. The investigators will also conduct exploratory analyses to determine whether participants' working memory capacity is affected by the different nicotine conditions.
Aim: Examine the effects of acute nicotine administration on Pavlovian bias. The investigators will explore the effects of acute nicotine on "go-bias" and "no-go bias." They anticipate that some level of Pavlovian bias will be observed across both sessions, on- and off- nicotine. Two patterns are expected to arise: a higher likelihood of making a go-response in the "win reward" condition and a higher likelihood of making a no-go response in the "avoid losing" condition, regardless of whether it is a "go" or "no-go" trial. However, after acute nicotine administration, participants will exhibit higher levels of Pavlovian bias, compared to the off-nicotine condition.
Understanding whether nicotine indeed does impact Pavlovian bias may provide insight into ways in which this bias affects nicotine addiction.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
After completing the vaping session, participants will be instructed on how to complete a version of the Go/No-Go task. They will see geometrical shapes on the screen, each of which will signal a particular trial type: go-win-win-reward, no-go-to-win-reward, go-to-avoid-losing, or no-go-to-avoid-losing. Participants will be explicitly instructed that the color of the cue edge will correspond to a specific trial: green will represent a "win reward" condition and red will represent an "avoid losing" condition.
BASIC_SCIENCE
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Nicotine
Participants will follow a standard vape protocol designed to deliver the approximate nicotine typically consumed from 1 cigarette (1.25 mg)
Nicotine
Nicotine delivered through a vape
Placebo
Participants will follow a standard vape protocol that is equal inhalation to that used in the nicotine condition.
Placebo
Placebo nicotine-free vaping liquid delivered through a vape
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Nicotine
Nicotine delivered through a vape
Placebo
Placebo nicotine-free vaping liquid delivered through a vape
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Current nicotine user (at least monthly use over the past 3 months)
* Reported willingness to abstain from all nicotine for at least 10 hours prior to the two lab visits
* English Language Competency
Exclusion Criteria
21 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Southern California
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
John Robert Monterosso
Assoc Prof Psychology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Algermissen J, Swart JC, Scheeringa R, Cools R, den Ouden HEM. Striatal BOLD and Midfrontal Theta Power Express Motivation for Action. Cereb Cortex. 2022 Jul 12;32(14):2924-2942. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhab391.
Guitart-Masip M, Chowdhury R, Sharot T, Dayan P, Duzel E, Dolan RJ. Action controls dopaminergic enhancement of reward representations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 8;109(19):7511-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1202229109. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
Scholz V, Hook RW, Kandroodi MR, Algermissen J, Ioannidis K, Christmas D, Valle S, Robbins TW, Grant JE, Chamberlain SR, den Ouden HEM. Cortical dopamine reduces the impact of motivational biases governing automated behaviour. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022 Jul;47(8):1503-1512. doi: 10.1038/s41386-022-01291-8. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
Swart JC, Frobose MI, Cook JL, Geurts DE, Frank MJ, Cools R, den Ouden HE. Catecholaminergic challenge uncovers distinct Pavlovian and instrumental mechanisms of motivated (in)action. Elife. 2017 May 15;6:e22169. doi: 10.7554/eLife.22169.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UP-23-00575
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.