Family Teams: A Study to Promote Team Collaboration in Family Medicine Clinics
NCT ID: NCT06011239
Last Updated: 2025-11-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
614 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-09-08
2025-10-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* The Ask: When staff are busy or overwhelmed by work, what tasks can others do (people in each of these groups) to help make your job better or easier?
* The Offer: When people in other groups are busy or overwhelmed, what tasks can your group do to help make staff jobs better or easier?
After this information is collected, at an in-person meeting of all staff and faculty, the study team will divide everyone into groups by clinic and then by the four roles. The study team will hand out the idea list and ask participants to review the list, discuss whether there are new or additional ideas which should be added, and then prioritize staffs top five "asks" and top five "offers" for staff role.
Negotiation of asks/offers: The study team will hold 1-4 subsequent brief meetings at each clinic where staff are again sub-divided into four groups by role. Each group will review the asks from people in other roles and decide whether these are actions that staff can help with or whether there are barriers. The clinic champions will work with the groups to address barriers (which could include lack of information, lack of training, disagreements about need, etc). The ultimate goal will be for groups to come to consensus agreement on at least three ways staff can assist people in other roles. In some clinics this may be straightforward and require just one meeting. In other clinics, it may take several meetings.
Implementation: Once the asks and offers are finalized, it will be up to the physician champions to help promote these agreements at the clinic, follow up with staff and with the nursing, medical assistants, and clerical champions to ensure that people are following thru with commitments to help, and trouble shoot problems that come up.
Coordination with Leadership: a department leader will serve as the liaison between the clinic champions and members of leadership that oversee clinical functions. This leader meets regularly with these leadership groups and will help troubleshoot challenges to implementing the asks and offers which need higher-level approval or input.
Ongoing process improvement: Over time, the study team will send up to four brief, anonymous surveys to all staff asking whether the staff are indeed doing the things that staff committed to do and whether other role groups are following thru on the commitments. This provides an opportunity for people to identify and report problems. This data will be anonymously fed back to the physician champion that is tasked to troubleshoot and address the problems identified, working with the liaison as appropriate. This will likely require continuous process improvement and revisiting to ensure success.
Evaluation: The study team proposes to measure burnout and team centeredness using anonymous on-line surveys.
Brief surveys: At several points during the year, the investigators will send out brief surveys. These ask for the clinic and job role and then ask participant to rate how much effort they have made to help others, how much effort others have made to help them, and if there are open-ended comment about what is or is not working. This information will be used to improve the intervention at each clinic.
Qualitative interviews regarding clinic culture will also be conducted with the project champions at each clinic who are helping to implement the project.
This study is Institutional review board (IRB) exempt and will have a waiver of documentation of informed consent with survey completion representing consent.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Survey participants
All participants in the study will be in a single arm, divided by clinic.
Team-building processes
All staff in one of the four role groups (medical assistants (MAs); clerical/administrative staff; nursing staff; and physicians/nurse practitioners/physician assistants) will be sent an anonymous survey. The survey will ask staff to consider what help participants wish to ask for and what help participants can offer to staff in the other three roles at times when people are busy or overwhelmed. These ideas will be combined into a typed "idea list" for each role and then staff in clinics will discuss. Once these are finalized the clinics will implement these.
At several points during the year, the study team will send out brief surveys. These surveys will collect the clinic and job role and ask participant to rate how much effort has been made in different ways, and if there are open-ended comments about what is or is not working. This information will be used to improve the intervention at each clinic.
Clinic Staff
"Project champions" at each clinic who are helping to implement the project.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Team-building processes
All staff in one of the four role groups (medical assistants (MAs); clerical/administrative staff; nursing staff; and physicians/nurse practitioners/physician assistants) will be sent an anonymous survey. The survey will ask staff to consider what help participants wish to ask for and what help participants can offer to staff in the other three roles at times when people are busy or overwhelmed. These ideas will be combined into a typed "idea list" for each role and then staff in clinics will discuss. Once these are finalized the clinics will implement these.
At several points during the year, the study team will send out brief surveys. These surveys will collect the clinic and job role and ask participant to rate how much effort has been made in different ways, and if there are open-ended comments about what is or is not working. This information will be used to improve the intervention at each clinic.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Must work in one of five family medicine clinics at the University of Michigan.
Exclusion Criteria
* Staff outside of the above roles such as a dietician, social worker, pharmacist
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Michigan
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Katherine Gold
Associate Professor of Family Medicine and of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Katherine Gold, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Michigan
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Michigan-Domino Farms
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
University of Michigan- Briarwood
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Uniiversity of Michigan- Chelsea
Chelsea, Michigan, United States
University of Michigan-Dexter
Dexter, Michigan, United States
University of Michigan-Ypsilanti
Ypsilanti, Michigan, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Stock R, Mahoney E, Carney PA. Measuring team development in clinical care settings. Fam Med. 2013 Nov-Dec;45(10):691-700.
Wee EXM, Fehr R. Compassion during difficult times: Team compassion behavior, suffering, supervisory dependence, and employee voice during COVID-19. J Appl Psychol. 2021 Dec;106(12):1805-1820. doi: 10.1037/apl0001001.
Pommier E, Neff KD, Toth-Kiraly I. The Development and Validation of the Compassion Scale. Assessment. 2020 Jan;27(1):21-39. doi: 10.1177/1073191119874108. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
Linzer M, McLoughlin C, Poplau S, Goelz E, Brown R, Sinsky C; AMA-Hennepin Health System (HHS) burnout reduction writing team. The Mini Z Worklife and Burnout Reduction Instrument: Psychometrics and Clinical Implications. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Aug;37(11):2876-2878. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07278-3. Epub 2022 Jan 19. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HUM00239209
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id