Efficacy & Safety of Pigtail Catheter Drainage Versus Need Based Thoracocentesis for Recurrent Hepatic Hydrothorax.
NCT ID: NCT06007820
Last Updated: 2023-08-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
70 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-08-15
2024-02-27
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparing Outcome of Thoracocentesis and Pigtail Catheter Drainage in Treatment of Patients With Hepatic Hydrothorax
NCT06319547
Pigtail Catheter: a Less Invasive Option for Pleural Drainage of Recurrent Hepatic Hydrothorax
NCT02119169
Efficacy and Safety of Early TIPS (Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunts) in the Management of Cirrhosis With Recurrent Ascites.
NCT04013074
Efficacy of Targeted And Response-Guided Albumin Therapy Versus Standard Medical Treatment In Outcomes Of Recurrent Ascites In Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis.
NCT04679571
TIPS With Coated Stents for Refractory Ascites in Patients With Cirrhosis
NCT00222014
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* Study design - A prospective, randomized, single center open label study
* Block Randomization, block size - 10
* Sample size - Assuming in single time thoracocentesis group 5+/-3.67 thoracocentesis is required, investigator expect a 50 % reduction in pigtail drainage group. Apha error- 5, power -90, 15% dropout 35 patients in each arm
* Intervention - Group 1 - on-demand therapeutic thoracocentensis, Group 2 - small volume frequent thoracocentesis using PCD.
* Monitoring and assessment
* At enrollment:
(A) Complete history and examination
1. Etiology of cirrhosis
2. Severity of ascites, Jaundice
3. Prior Hepatic encephalopathy, bleed, Jaundice
4. Prior Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, large volume paracentesis frequency
5. Pattern and number of prior decompensation
6. Prior Acute on Chronic Liver Failure and Acute Kidney episodes
7. Use of non selective beta blockers, norfloxaxin, rifaximin and albumin
8. History of Endoscopic Variceal ligation or other endotherapy
9. History of Hypertension, Diabetes
10. Fever , signs of sepsis (SIRS)
11. Examination- Sarcopenia, fraility, icterus, pedal edema
At follow-up (at daily till Day - 7, thereafter at Day - 30 and Day 90) Complete history and examination
1. Complications - SBP, SBE, ACLF and Jaundice, HE/ AKI episodes
2. HTN, Diabetes control
3. Fever , signs of sepsis (SIRS)
4. Examination- Sarcopenia, fraility, icterus, pedal edema, ascites, HE Clinical Evaluation
1\. Etiology of chronic liver disease (Baseline) 2. Severity of liver disease (Baseline, Day - 7, Day - 30, Day - 90 ) 3. MELD score, MELD-Na score, CTP score (Baseline, Day - 7, Day - 30, Day - 90 ) 4. Complications (Baseline, Day - 7, Day - 30, Day - 90 ) 5. Overt HE, PHT related Bleed, clinical jaundice, ascites, hyponatremia, AKI, SBP, Infection (specify site and severity), Frequency of Large Volume Paracentesis, On Demand Thoracocentesis
* Labs and follow up Baseline (at admission) -
1. Blood : KFT, LFT, CBC, INR, AFP, PCT, S.PRA, Pro-BNP, Urinary Na
2. Imaging : USG abdomen, X-ray chest, 2D ECHO
3. Pleural fluid/ ascitic fluid - TLC, DLC, Protein, Sugar, SPAG, SAAG, ADA, c/s
4. Hemodynamics : Intrapleural pressures at first TT
5. Baseline (at randomization, Day -3 and Day - 7 in PCD-TT) -
6. Blood : KFT, INR; S.PRA, Pro-BNP, Urinary Na (at Day 7)
7. Imaging : X-ray chest
8. Pleural fluid/ ascitic fluid - TLC, DLC, SPAG, c/s if indicated
9. Day - 60, Day - 90 (end of follow-up)
10. Blood : KFT, LFT, CBC, INR, AFP
11. Imaging : USG abdomen, X-ray chest, 2D ECHO
* STATISTICAL ANALYSIS -
1. Data will be reported as mean + SD.
2. Categorical variables will be compared using the chi-square test or Fisher exact test
3. Normal continuous variables will be compared using the Student's t test
4. Non normal continuous variables will be compared using the Mann-Whitney rank-sum test (unpaired data) or the Wilcoxon test (paired data).
5. The actuarial probability of survival will be calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test.
6. A Cox regression analysis will be performed to identify independent prognostic factors for survival.
7. Univariate and multivariate analysis will be used whenever applicable.
* Adverse effects - Chest pain, pain at the site, Breathlessness, infection, pneumothorax, infection, bleeding
* Stopping rule -
1. Liver Transplant
2. Appearance of SBP, PICD, HE.
3. Mortality
4. End of follow-up
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Large Volume Thoracocentesis
Group 1 - on-demand therapeutic thoracocentensis
Large Volume Thoracocentesis
Large Volume Thoracocentesis
Pigtail Catheter
Group 2 - small volume frequent thoracocentesis using PCD
Pigtail Catheter
Pigtail Catheter
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Large Volume Thoracocentesis
Large Volume Thoracocentesis
Pigtail Catheter
Pigtail Catheter
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. CLD with refilling symptomatic hepatic hydrothorax
Exclusion Criteria
2. Tubercular PE, Ischemic cardiac disease
3. If opting for TIPS/ LT
4. Severe HPS
5. Prior or current SBE/ SBP, septic shock
6. Patients on mechanical ventilator
7. Serum Creatinine \>2 mg/dl
8. Extrahepatic malignancy
9. Serum Sodium \< 120
10. Post TIPS/ BRTO/ SAE patients
11. Post renal or liver transplantation
12. Lack of informed consent
13. Hepatocellular carcinoma outside milan criteria
14. Non-cirrhotic portal HT
15. Known HIV infection
16. Pregnant women
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences
New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, India
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ILBS-Cirrhosis-60
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.