Efficacy & Safety of Pigtail Catheter Drainage Versus Need Based Thoracocentesis for Recurrent Hepatic Hydrothorax.

NCT ID: NCT06007820

Last Updated: 2023-08-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

70 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-08-15

Study Completion Date

2024-02-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In cirrhotic patients with recurrent hepatic hydrothorax liver transplantation is a definitive treatment. But a significant number of individual are ineligible for liver transplantation. In these patients to ameliorate the symptoms various treatment modalities such as TIPS, serial thoracocentesis, pigtail catheter drainage and pleurodesis are used. We are doing this study to assess the safety and efficacy of serial thoracocentesis verus pigtail catheter drainage.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

* Study population - Cirrhotic patients with recurrent hepatic hydrothorax
* Study design - A prospective, randomized, single center open label study
* Block Randomization, block size - 10
* Sample size - Assuming in single time thoracocentesis group 5+/-3.67 thoracocentesis is required, investigator expect a 50 % reduction in pigtail drainage group. Apha error- 5, power -90, 15% dropout 35 patients in each arm
* Intervention - Group 1 - on-demand therapeutic thoracocentensis, Group 2 - small volume frequent thoracocentesis using PCD.
* Monitoring and assessment
* At enrollment:

(A) Complete history and examination

1. Etiology of cirrhosis
2. Severity of ascites, Jaundice
3. Prior Hepatic encephalopathy, bleed, Jaundice
4. Prior Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, large volume paracentesis frequency
5. Pattern and number of prior decompensation
6. Prior Acute on Chronic Liver Failure and Acute Kidney episodes
7. Use of non selective beta blockers, norfloxaxin, rifaximin and albumin
8. History of Endoscopic Variceal ligation or other endotherapy
9. History of Hypertension, Diabetes
10. Fever , signs of sepsis (SIRS)
11. Examination- Sarcopenia, fraility, icterus, pedal edema

At follow-up (at daily till Day - 7, thereafter at Day - 30 and Day 90) Complete history and examination

1. Complications - SBP, SBE, ACLF and Jaundice, HE/ AKI episodes
2. HTN, Diabetes control
3. Fever , signs of sepsis (SIRS)
4. Examination- Sarcopenia, fraility, icterus, pedal edema, ascites, HE Clinical Evaluation

1\. Etiology of chronic liver disease (Baseline) 2. Severity of liver disease (Baseline, Day - 7, Day - 30, Day - 90 ) 3. MELD score, MELD-Na score, CTP score (Baseline, Day - 7, Day - 30, Day - 90 ) 4. Complications (Baseline, Day - 7, Day - 30, Day - 90 ) 5. Overt HE, PHT related Bleed, clinical jaundice, ascites, hyponatremia, AKI, SBP, Infection (specify site and severity), Frequency of Large Volume Paracentesis, On Demand Thoracocentesis

* Labs and follow up Baseline (at admission) -

1. Blood : KFT, LFT, CBC, INR, AFP, PCT, S.PRA, Pro-BNP, Urinary Na
2. Imaging : USG abdomen, X-ray chest, 2D ECHO
3. Pleural fluid/ ascitic fluid - TLC, DLC, Protein, Sugar, SPAG, SAAG, ADA, c/s
4. Hemodynamics : Intrapleural pressures at first TT
5. Baseline (at randomization, Day -3 and Day - 7 in PCD-TT) -
6. Blood : KFT, INR; S.PRA, Pro-BNP, Urinary Na (at Day 7)
7. Imaging : X-ray chest
8. Pleural fluid/ ascitic fluid - TLC, DLC, SPAG, c/s if indicated
9. Day - 60, Day - 90 (end of follow-up)
10. Blood : KFT, LFT, CBC, INR, AFP
11. Imaging : USG abdomen, X-ray chest, 2D ECHO
* STATISTICAL ANALYSIS -

1. Data will be reported as mean + SD.
2. Categorical variables will be compared using the chi-square test or Fisher exact test
3. Normal continuous variables will be compared using the Student's t test
4. Non normal continuous variables will be compared using the Mann-Whitney rank-sum test (unpaired data) or the Wilcoxon test (paired data).
5. The actuarial probability of survival will be calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test.
6. A Cox regression analysis will be performed to identify independent prognostic factors for survival.
7. Univariate and multivariate analysis will be used whenever applicable.
* Adverse effects - Chest pain, pain at the site, Breathlessness, infection, pneumothorax, infection, bleeding
* Stopping rule -

1. Liver Transplant
2. Appearance of SBP, PICD, HE.
3. Mortality
4. End of follow-up

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hepatic Hydrothorax

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Large Volume Thoracocentesis

Group 1 - on-demand therapeutic thoracocentensis

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Large Volume Thoracocentesis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Large Volume Thoracocentesis

Pigtail Catheter

Group 2 - small volume frequent thoracocentesis using PCD

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Pigtail Catheter

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Pigtail Catheter

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Large Volume Thoracocentesis

Large Volume Thoracocentesis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Pigtail Catheter

Pigtail Catheter

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age 18-75 years
2. CLD with refilling symptomatic hepatic hydrothorax

Exclusion Criteria

1. CTP \>12, MELD\>25
2. Tubercular PE, Ischemic cardiac disease
3. If opting for TIPS/ LT
4. Severe HPS
5. Prior or current SBE/ SBP, septic shock
6. Patients on mechanical ventilator
7. Serum Creatinine \>2 mg/dl
8. Extrahepatic malignancy
9. Serum Sodium \< 120
10. Post TIPS/ BRTO/ SAE patients
11. Post renal or liver transplantation
12. Lack of informed consent
13. Hepatocellular carcinoma outside milan criteria
14. Non-cirrhotic portal HT
15. Known HIV infection
16. Pregnant women
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences

New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, India

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

India

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Dr Jaifrin Daniel, MD

Role: CONTACT

01146300000

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Dr . Jaifrin Daniel, MD

Role: primary

01146300000

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ILBS-Cirrhosis-60

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

AI-guided TIPS Procedure
NCT06837974 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA