Testing the Feasibility of the Individualized Positive Psychosocial Intervention (IPPI)
NCT ID: NCT05980299
Last Updated: 2025-11-03
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
200 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-07-10
2025-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Promoting Positive Care Interactions (PPCI) in Assisted Living
NCT05618834
Testing the Implementation of EIT-4-BPSD
NCT03014570
Indiana University Dementia Screening Trial
NCT01699503
Implementation of Function Focused Care in Acute Care
NCT04235374
Coordinating Center for Caregiver Intervention Trial
NCT00177489
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Our goal with this proposal is to partner with United Church Homes (UCH), a 106-year-old nonprofit national senior living provider to conduct a full implementation feasibility pilot of the IPPI program with long-stay residents in 9 of their NHs. Our objective is to conduct a pilot study to evaluate 1) the ability of staff to identify residents who are optimal for the IPPI, 2) implementation of IPPI, and 3) the impact on pragmatic clinical outcome measures (BPSD and depressive symptoms). Staff champions will be identified by the stakeholder team in each NH (e.g., Director of Nursing, Activity Professional) and trained to identify residents optimal for the IPPI (i.e., experiencing cognitive impairment (Minimum Data Set (MDS) Brief Inventory for Mental Status (BIMS) score 0-12) as well as documentation (MDS Section E or D) of distress within the past 3-months. Distress is indicated by a 1 or higher on any of the 5 behavior items from MDS Section E (i.e., physical, verbal, other behavior, rejection of care, wandering) and/or a score of 1 or higher on one of 5 MDS section D items (i.e., anhedonia, sad mood, poor self-esteem, poor appetite, restlessness).
Care partners of identified residents will be invited to be trained to deliver IPPI. The investigators anticipate that each NH will initiate engagement with 4-5 residents per month for each of 3 consecutive months (12-15 residents per NH) in addition to 3-4 care partners who will deliver the IPPI. Resident initiation in the program will occur on a rolling basis (i.e., initiating intervention activities for a given resident when he/she is due for a routine quarterly care plan review). Each selected resident will then receive 2 IPPI sessions per week for 6 months. The project seeks to achieve the following specific aims:
Aim 1. To conduct a pilot embedded Pragmatic Clinical Trial (ePCT) to evaluate and establish the feasibility of implementing the IPPI program in 9 NHs among 108-135 residents. Quantitative implementation endpoints indicating success include (a) that staff in each community will be able to identify and engage 12-15 residents experiencing both dementia (e.g., BIMS 0-12) and distress (either BPSD or depressive symptoms) within the past 2 weeks, measured by a count of participants; (b) that all the implementation team members (champions and care partners) can complete the online training within the first two months of initiating implementation, as indicated by the learning management system; (c) that the implementation team will be able to (i) review existing data from Section F of the MDS for all selected residents; (ii) identify a match between a resident's important preferences and 1-2 IPPI protocols; (iii) identify a targeted expression of distress as measured by documentation in the electronic medical record; and (d) that staff can conduct at least 2 ten-minute sessions per week, per targeted resident with fidelity over the course of 6 months as measured in the electronic medial record (EMR). Qualitative data to evaluate implementation will be ascertained from semi-structured interviews with implementation team members in each community to assess acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness as well as facilitators and barriers to fidelity of the IPPI sessions.
Aim 2. To establish the feasibility of tracking intervention impact on a primary clinical outcome of a targeted behavior (identified by staff) through the MDS Section E (E0200A, B or C; or E0800) or MDS Section D (Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) items of anhedonia, sad mood, poor self-esteem, poor appetite, or restlessness). The primary outcome measure will consist of a single variable indicating improvement, no change, or worsening of a staff-targeted behavior of distress of each resident receiving the intervention, tracked pre- and post-IPPI intervention using routinely collected data in the EMR. Secondary staff outcomes will include knowledge of emotion-focused communication and staff reported self-efficacy in applying the communication skills.
IMPACT: The IPPI program teaches care partners strategies to better identify and manage their own feelings and those of PLWD through our emotion-focused communication course. In addition, the program provides highly structured and feasible protocols to guide short but impactful interactions with PLWD designed to prevent and remediate distress (i.e., BPSD and symptoms of depression). Findings from this pilot study will guide the implementation, approach, and power needed for a full-scale Stage IV effectiveness ePCT study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
experimental
The experimental arm involves a brief positive interaction around a preferred activity or personal care routine.
Individualized Positive Psychosocial Interaction
The intervention involves a brief positive interaction around a preferred activity or personal care routine.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Individualized Positive Psychosocial Interaction
The intervention involves a brief positive interaction around a preferred activity or personal care routine.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Be a long-term resident in a nursing home
2. Have a score of 0-12 on the Brief Inventory for Mental Status (BIMS)
3. Either (could be both) on their most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment A score of 1 or higher on any of the 5 behavior items from MDS Section E (i.e., physical, verbal, other behavior, rejection of care, wandering) A score of 1 or higher on one of 5 MDS section D items (i.e., anhedonia, sad mood, poor self-esteem, poor appetite, restlessness)
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
110 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
United Church Homes
UNKNOWN
Penn State University
OTHER
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
OTHER
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
NIH
Miami University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Katherine Abbott, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Miami University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Trinity Community at Beavercreek
Beavercreek, Ohio, United States
The Chapel Hill Community
Canal Fulton, Ohio, United States
The Trinity Community at Fairborn
Fairborn, Ohio, United States
The Four Winds Community
Jackson, Ohio, United States
The Harmar Place Community
Marietta, Ohio, United States
SEM Haven
Milford, Ohio, United States
The Parkvue Community
Sandusky, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Van Haitsma KS, Curyto K, Abbott KM, Towsley GL, Spector A, Kleban M. A randomized controlled trial for an individualized positive psychosocial intervention for the affective and behavioral symptoms of dementia in nursing home residents. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2015 Jan;70(1):35-45. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbt102. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
Abbott KM, Heid AR, Noble M, Kotterman A, Unroe K, Van Haitsma K. An Embedded Pragmatic Clinical Trial of the Individualized Positive Psychosocial Interaction (IPPI) Program. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2025 Aug;26(8):105700. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105700. Epub 2025 Jun 12.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
403853
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
FY22_Pilot5_Abbott
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.