Searching for Masses and Calcifications at the Same Time in Breast Cancer Screening

NCT ID: NCT05975736

Last Updated: 2025-02-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

70 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-09-01

Study Completion Date

2028-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Brief Summary

A task like breast cancer screening (mammography) can be described as a "hybrid search" task. In basic visual search tasks, observers search for a target among distractors that are not the target. In hybrid search, observers search for two or more target types. In mammography, observers are searching for masses, calcifications ("calcs"), and some other signs of cancer like architectural distortion. In this experiment, the investigators have created a simulated version of mammography where non-expert (non-radiologist) observers can look for simulated masses and calcs. There are two types of stimuli, a 2D version (like an x-ray) and a 3D version (like the output of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis - DBT). The question that is being asked is whether it is better to ask about masses and calcs separately (first one, then the other) or to just let observers look for both at the same time.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Brief Summary

A task like breast cancer screening (mammography) can be described as a "hybrid search" task. In basic visual search tasks, observers search for a target among distractors that are not the target. In hybrid search, observers search for two or more target types. In mammography, observers are searching for masses, calcifications ("calcs"), and some other signs of cancer like architectural distortion. In this experiment, the investigators have created a simulated version of mammography where non-expert (non-radiologist) observers can look for simulated masses and calcs. There are two types of stimuli, a 2D version (like an x-ray) and a 3D version (like the output of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis - DBT). The question that is being asked is whether it is better to ask about masses and calcs separately (first one, then the other) or to just let observers look for both at the same time.

Extended protocol

NOTE: This registration is linked to a Human Subjects registration in ASSIST. That, in turn, is part of an NCI Grant, CA207490. The grant describes many proposed experiments and notes that many others might be done as follow-up studies. At the suggestion of the NIH, the investigators grouped these studies into three "studies", each covering multiple experiments. The experiment described here is part of "Study ID 386409 Projects 1,2,3: Experiments with Non experts". It is not possible to register a set of experiments through the PRS system in CT.gov and it is not possible to file an annual report for the grant (RPPR) without an NCT number for projects that have started collecting participants. Accordingly, the investigators are describing one experiment here that would be part of the "Project 2" bundle of studies.

These experiments take what is known about "hybrid search" tasks from the lab and applies it to clinical mammography. Hybrid search tasks are tasks that involve looking for more than one type of target at the same time (e.g. search for this pillow and any animal in the scene in front of you).

Standard 2D mammography and 3D DBT can be thought of as hybrid search tasks. That is, mammography can be thought of as a hybrid search for masses and calcifications. What is the optimal way to do this task? Should readers look for both types of targets at the same time or should they be asked to look for one target type and then the other. It is likely that the sequential approach improves accuracy but at some cost in time. The investigators will test that hypothesis of a "speed/accuracy tradeoff".

The investigators have developed a version of the 2D mammography task that can be run on non-experts. Breast parenchyma is simulated with 1/fk noise (k=1.8 - 2.8). Artificial masses and calcifications (calcs) can be added to this background. Masses are relatively low contrast blobs that are deemed to be "bad" if they have many irregular bumps and benign if they are smoother. Calcs are brighter, higher contrast, small spots. These are deemed to be benign unless they form a cluster of nearby spots in the image. The task is designed to be hard. The goal is performance producing a d' value in the range of 2.0 to 2.5. Bad and benign stimuli are selected from uniformly distributed stimuli sets. For masses, when the target is 'bad', bad mass is randomly selected from 5 levels of bumpiness. The same rule is applied for selecting benign stimuli from five less-bumpy levels. For calcifications, the number of pixels in a cluster is randomly selected between 4\~12.

There are four conditions to be tested in the first experiment:

1. Search for masses alone
2. Search for calcs alone
3. Search for both together
4. Search for one after the other (mass -\> calc) or (calc -\> mass)

In addition, there are two different ways of presenting the four conditions. These could be considered to be two arms of the study. Either participants could see each condition in a block of 100 trials or the four conditions could be mixed into one set of 400 trials (with breaks every 100 trials to keep the pacing of the experiment consistent.

In the initial experiment, target prevalence will be 60%. In future experiments, lower prevalence will be tested. The measures of interest are accuracy and RT and the most interesting question is whether the sequential condition produces any benefits that might be worth the presumed cost in time.

The 3D version is like the 2D version except that a volume of 1/fk noise is created and masses and calcs are added so that they fade in and out of view as the observer scrolls through "slices" through the 3D volume. This simulates DBT.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mammography Breast Cancer Radiology

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

One group of observers will get separate blocks of each of four conditions. The other group will see all conditions, intermixed.
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Participants will not know the goals of the study but they will be fully informed about the conditions and asked to respond "as quickly and accurately as possible".

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Blocked Trials

There are four conditions in the experiment. Each condition will be presented in a separate block of 100 trials.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Search only for masses

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants search the simulated mammogram for simulated masses.

Search only for calcifications

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants search the simulated mammogram for simulated calcifications.

Search for both together

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Search the simulated mammogram for both simulated masses and simulated calcifications at the same time.

Search for one after the other

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Search the simulated mammogram for first for simulated masses and then for simulated calcifications sequentially (or vice versa).

Mixed Trials

There are four conditions in the experiment. All condition will be presented, randomly mixed in a single block of 400 trials (with breaks every 100 trials).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Search only for masses

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants search the simulated mammogram for simulated masses.

Search only for calcifications

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants search the simulated mammogram for simulated calcifications.

Search for both together

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Search the simulated mammogram for both simulated masses and simulated calcifications at the same time.

Search for one after the other

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Search the simulated mammogram for first for simulated masses and then for simulated calcifications sequentially (or vice versa).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Search only for masses

Participants search the simulated mammogram for simulated masses.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Search only for calcifications

Participants search the simulated mammogram for simulated calcifications.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Search for both together

Search the simulated mammogram for both simulated masses and simulated calcifications at the same time.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Search for one after the other

Search the simulated mammogram for first for simulated masses and then for simulated calcifications sequentially (or vice versa).

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age over 18 yrs
* Pass Ishihara color vision test

Exclusion Criteria

* vision less than 20/25 with correction
* history of neuromuscular or visual disorders
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Brigham and Women's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jeremy M Wolfe, PhD

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jeremy M Wolfe, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2007P000646-E

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.