Comparative Study of Dorzotimol Eye Drops, 20 mg/mL + 5 mg/mL Versus Cosopt® Eye Drops, 20 mg/mL + 5 mg/mL

NCT ID: NCT05973318

Last Updated: 2023-08-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

110 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-04-10

Study Completion Date

2018-09-17

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this study is to compare efficacy and safety of Dorzotimol eye drops, 20 mg/mL + 5 mg/mL manufactured by JADRAN-GALENSKI LABORATORIJ d.d. (Croatia) aimed at lowering elevated IOP in patients with ocular hypertension and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) versus Cosopt® eye drops, 20 mg/mL + 5 mg/mL manufactured by Laboratoires Merck Sharp \& Dohme-Chibret, France. The main questions it aims to answer are:

* if the efficacy of the investigational drug and the reference drug in patients with ocular hypertension and primary open-angle glaucoma is equal;
* if the safety of the investigational drug and the reference drug in patients with ocular hypertension and primary open-angle glaucoma is equal.

A total of 110 participants were screened and randomized 1:1 to the investigational drug (Dorzotimol) group or the reference drug (Cosopt) group. 55 patients were recruited in each group.

Researchers compared the investigational drug (Dorzotimol) group with the reference drug (Cosopt) group to see if the efficacy and safety of the investigational drug and the reference drug in patients with ocular hypertension and primary open-angle glaucoma are equal.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Study Title:

An open-label, randomized, controlled, comparative efficacy and safety study of Dorzotimol eye drops, 20 mg/mL + 5 mg/mL, manufacturer: JADRAN - GALENSKI LABORATORIJ d.d., Croatia, vs. Cosopt® eye drops, 20 mg/mL + 5 mg/mL, manufacturer: Laboratoires Merck Sharp \& Dohme-Chibret, France, in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma.

Protocol No. DORZOTIMOL-10/2015, version No. 1.2 of 16.05.2017. RCT No. 632 of 09.09.2016.

Investigators:

1. Abdulaeva Elmira Abdulaevna (Test facility No.4)
2. Eryomina Alyona Victorovna (Test facility No.6)
3. Lisitsyn Alexey Borisovich (Test facility No.7)
4. Doga Alexander Victorovich (Test facility No.9)

Test facilities:

No.4. State autonomous healthcare institution 'Republican Clinical Ophthalmological Hospital of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Tatarstan', 420012, Republic of Tatarstan, Kazan, Butlerova St., 14.

No.6. Federal state autonomous institution 'Acad. S.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Interbranch Science and Technology Complex', Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 127486, Moscow, Beskudnikovsky Blvd., 59A (branch: 630071, Novosibirsk, Kolkhidskaya St., 10).

No.7. State healthcare institution of Yaroslavl region 'Clinical Hospital No. 8', 150030, Yaroslavl, Suzdalskoe Highway, 39.

No.9. Federal state autonomous institution 'Acad. S.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Interbranch Science and Technology Complex', Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 127486, Moscow, Beskudnikovsky Blvd., 59A

Study period:

First patient enrollment date: 10 April 2017 Study completion date: 17 September 2018

Phase:

III (a safety and efficacy study)

Study objective:

The study objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Dorzotimol eye drops, 20 mg/mL + 5 mg/mL, manufacturer: JADRAN - GALENSKI LABORATORIJ d.d., Croatia, designed to reduce elevated intraocular pressure in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), vs. Cosopt® eye drops, 20 mg/mL + 5 mg/mL, manufacturer: Laboratoires Merck Sharp \& Dohme-Chibret, France.

Study tasks:

* Demonstrate sufficient similarity of the efficacy profiles of the test and reference product in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma.
* Demonstrate sufficient similarity of the safety profiles of the test and reference product in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma.

Study design:

A multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized, comparative, controlled, parallel-arm study evaluating the efficacy and safety in patients with a specific disease.

Study subjects: 110 patients (55 patients in each group) with elevated intraocular pressure induced by primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), males and females in the age bracket of 18 to 75 years conforming to the inclusion/exclusion criteria.

Patients randomized: 110 Dropouts: 0 Per protocol population: 110 Safety population: 110 Drug therapy type

Test product:

Trade name: Dorzotimol INN or generic name: dorzolamide+timolol Pharmaceutical form: eye drops

Composition per 1 mL:

Active ingredients: dorzolamide hydrochloride 22.25 mg (equivalent to dorzolamide 20 mg), timolol maleate 6.83 mg (equivalent to timolol 5 mg).

Excipients: benzalkonium chloride (as 50% solution), mannitol, sodium citrate, sodium hydroxide, hydroxyethyl cellulose, purified water.

Manufacturer: JADRAN - GALENSKI LABORATORIJ d.d., Croatia Posology and method of administration: Instillation into the conjunctival sac of 1 drop twice daily for 12 weeks.

Reference product description and labeling:

Trade name: Cosopt® INN or generic name: dorzolamide+timolol Pharmaceutical form: eye drops

Composition:

Active ingredients: dorzolamide 20 mg (dorzolamide hydrochloride 22.26 mg) and timolol 5 mg (timolol maleate 6.83 mg).

Excipients: benzalkonium chloride (as 50% benzalkonium chloride solution) 0.075 mg (0.15 mg), sodium citrate 2.94 mg, mannitol 16.00 mg, hyetellose (hydroxyethyl cellulose) 4.75 mg, 1M sodium hydroxide solution q.s. to рН 5.6, water for injection q.s. to 1 mL.

Manufacturer: Laboratoires Merck Sharp \& Dohme-Chibret, France Study duration: Screening: 7 days. Washout period: 7 days. The comparison product treatment lasted for 12 weeks (84±2 days), which was consistent with the reference product PIL. Follow-up period for safety evaluation: 7 days. The overall study duration per patient did not exceed 100 days.

The efficacy was established based on analysis of the parameters as follows:

Primary endpoint

* Mean IOP change from baseline. Secondary endpoints
* IOP reduction rate to the target level of ≤ 18 mm Hg.
* IOP reduction rate greater than 20%.
* IOP reduction rate greater than 30%. Safety evaluation
* Incidence of other adverse events to a greater or lesser extent linked to the test or reference product, including those evaluated from laboratory test findings.
* Treatment safety will be assessed from recording adverse events via analysis of complaints and symptoms, evaluation, and interpretation of the findings of instrumental monitoring (biomicroscopy, ophthalmoscopy, IOP measures, perimetry) and laboratory tests.
* Given that the test product may cause miosis resulting in transient visual acuity reduced, the contribution of the visual acuity parameter 'Vis' is not taken into account when assessing the treatment success.

Statistical analysis Statistical analysis was performed using Statsoft Statistica Professional 13 and Microsoft Excel 2016 software.

The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to evaluate the normality of distribution of quantitative attributes. Parametric tests were used for testing statistical hypotheses for parameters with the normal distribution, whereas nonparametric tests were used for parameters with the variance of the distribution. Student's t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used for comparing the study groups in terms of quantitative attributes. The comparison of intragroup parameters before and after treatment was performed using the dependent samples t-test or the Wilcoxon test. The intragroup comparisons were also performed using nonparametric repeated measures ANOVA (the Friedman test). Qualitative attributes were analyzed using Pearson's χ2 test or Fisher's exact test (if the attribute incidence rate in at least one subgroup was ≤ 5).

Statistically significant are differences with p-values \< 0.05. Efficacy analysis of the comparison products provides for a conclusion on

• Noninferiority of the test product Dorzotimol, eye drops (JADRAN - GALENSKI LABORATORIJ d.d., Croatia) vs. reference product Cosopt®, eye drops (Laboratoires Merck Sharp \& Dohme-Chibret, France) by the primary endpoint:

* No statistically significant intergroup differences have been observed regarding a mean intraocular pressure change from baseline either in the treatment or control group (p = 0.0939; Mann-Whitney U test).
* The efficacy differences between the test and reference product by the primary criterion do not exceed the noninferiority margin of 1.5 mm Hg.

Intergroup efficacy comparisons of the comparison products by the secondary endpoints have also been performed, with statistical significance of intergroup differences evaluated:

* No statistically significant intergroup differences have been observed regarding the IOP reduction rate to the target level of ≤ 18 mm Hg either in the treatment or control group (p = 0.3061; Pearson's χ2 test), which is indicative of Dorzotimol noninferiority by this parameter vs. reference product.
* No statistically significant intergroup differences have been observed regarding the IOP reduction rate greater than 20% at visit 6 from baseline either in the treatment or control group (p = 0.6336; Pearson's χ2 test), which is indicative of Dorzotimol noninferiority by this parameter vs. reference product.
* No statistically significant intergroup differences have been observed regarding the IOP reduction rate greater than 30% at visit 6 from baseline either in the treatment or control group (p = 0.4492, Pearson's χ2 test), which is indicative of Dorzotimol noninferiority by this parameter vs. reference product.

The product safety was assessed from the vital parameters evaluation results, laboratory test and instrumental monitoring data as well as the adverse event occurrence and severity.

The safety evaluation provided for the conclusions as follows:

* Analysis of these AEs is indicative of comparable safety of the test product:

* AE occurrence in the treatment group does not differ reliably from AE occurrence in the control group (p = 0.3242; Pearson's χ2 test).
* AE link to the test product was most characterized as 'probable'; there were no statistically significant intergroup differences by this parameter either (p = 0.2774).
* AE severity was most characterized as mild; there were no statistically significant intergroup differences by this parameter either (p = 0.4309).
* There were no statistically significant intergroup differences either when assessing physical examination parameters or in terms of individual dynamics level.
* Analysis of the patients' laboratory test findings has identified statistically reliable differences by certain parameters (hemoglobin, glucose levels); however, these differences are also linked to patients' personality traits.

Thus, based on all criteria specified in the Clinical Trial Protocol, the test product Dorzotimol and reference product Cosopt® demonstrate close efficacy and safety parameters. There are no statistically significant intergroup differences by any efficacy criteria tested. The efficacy differences between the test and reference product by the primary criterion do not exceed the noninferiority margin of 1.5 mm Hg. The above-stated provides for a conclusion on the test product Dorzotimol noninferiority vs. reference product Cosopt®.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Primary Open Angle Glaucoma of Both Eyes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients with primary open-angle glaucoma receiving Dorzotimol eye drops, 20 mg/mL + 5 mg/mL

Dosing schedule b.i.d., 12 weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dorzotimol eye drops, 20 mg/mL + 5 mg/mL

Intervention Type DRUG

Dosing schedule b.i.d.

Patients with primary open-angle glaucoma receiving Cosopt eye drops, 20 mg/mL + 5 mg/mL

Dosing schedule b.i.d., 12 weeks

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cosopt eye drops, 20 mg/mL + 5 mg/mL

Intervention Type DRUG

Dosing schedule b.i.d.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dorzotimol eye drops, 20 mg/mL + 5 mg/mL

Dosing schedule b.i.d.

Intervention Type DRUG

Cosopt eye drops, 20 mg/mL + 5 mg/mL

Dosing schedule b.i.d.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Dorzotimol Cosopt

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Females or males in the age bracket of 18 to 75 years.
* Established stage I and II primary open-angle glaucoma in one or both eyes.
* Intraocular pressure (IOP) level: 22-36 mm Hg (by Goldmann applanation tonometry).
* Visual acuity 0.3 or better on the tested eye.
* Taking topical prostaglandin analogs as monotherapy at least 3 months prior to the enrollment into the study and poor IOP control (\> 21 mm Hg) or failure to achieve the target IOP, as estimated by the physician.
* Patients who have signed an informed consent to participate in the study.
* For females of child-bearing potential - a negative pregnancy test and consent to use reliable contraception methods throughout the study

Exclusion Criteria

* The only eye.
* Visual acuity ˂ 0.3 after correction.
* An active infectious inflammatory process on the tested eye within 3 months prior to pre-study medical examination.
* Pronounced visual field defects (III and IV stage open-angle glaucoma).
* IOP \> 36 mm Hg or \< 22 mm Hg as at the IOP measuring at 11:00 a.m. (±1 h) in any of the eyes on the screening visit day.
* Closed or nearly closed anterior chamber angle (ACA) or history of acute angle close.
* Surgical and laser eye interventions over the last 3 months.
* Manifest ocular media opacification hindering the treatment efficacy evaluation.
* Other eye diseases that may affect dynamics of the parameters used for the treatment efficacy evaluation.
* Inflammatory conditions of the eye and appendages (blepharitis, conjunctivitis).
* Corneal dystrophies.
* The patient's participation in another clinical trial for the last 3 months.
* Sinus bradycardia.
* Second-degree and third-degree AV block.
* Cardiogenic shock.
* Decompensated cardiovascular diseases (angina pectoris \> functional class II, arterial hypertension \[systolic pressure \> 140 mm Hg, diastolic pressure \> 90 mm Hg\]), apparent heart failure.
* Severe renal failure (CC \< 30 mL/min).
* Airway hyperresponsiveness, bronchial asthma, history of bronchial asthma, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
* Any other systemic or mental disorder/condition (unmanageable arterial hypertension, decompensated diabetes mellitus, severe renal impairment, hyperchloremic acidosis) or clinically relevant abnormal laboratory tests at screening that, in the Investigator's opinion, may put a patient to a significant risk, or compromise the study results, or appreciably affect the possibility for the patient to participate in the study.
* A patient who is unlikely to comply with the protocol requirements, e.g., is undisposed to cooperation, and is unlikely to complete the study.
* Females and males of reproductive age refusing to use efficacious contraception methods.
* Females during pregnancy and breastfeeding
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Jadran Galenski laboratorij d.d.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Elmira Abdulaeva

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Republican Clinical Ophthalmological Hospital of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Tatarstan

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Republican Clinical Ophthalmological Hospital of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Tatarstan

Kazan', , Russia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Russia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DORZOTIMOL-10/2015

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cosopt Versus Xalacom
NCT00273481 COMPLETED PHASE4
Cosopt Versus Xalatan
NCT00273429 COMPLETED PHASE4
Assessing Cosopt Switch Patients
NCT00273442 COMPLETED PHASE4