Efficiency and Safety of Nasal Positive Airway Pressure Systems During Endoscopy
NCT ID: NCT05972304
Last Updated: 2023-08-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
98 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-04-01
2022-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Nasal CPAP - The Treatment IMpact on Oxygenation in High-risk Patients During Deep Sedation for Endoscopy
NCT06168682
Efficacy of High Flow Nasal Oxygen During Sleep Endoscopy in Patients of Obstructive Sleep Apnea
NCT03777202
Observation of Clinical Effect of New Oropharyngeal Airway in Patients With OSHAS During Painless Gastroenteroscopy
NCT06594380
Ansa Cervicalis and Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation in OSA
NCT05501236
Efficacy of Simple Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea
NCT03782844
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This especially because standard oximetric monitoring displays only hypoxia and not the preceding hypercapnia. Therefore, the question arises whether the implication of a nasal positive airway pressure (nPAP) system can decrease the rate of sedation associated events.
The Null Hypothesis: The incidence of hypoxia in interventional group, using nasal positive airway pressure system, in comparison to control group with conventional oxygen supplementation canula is not significant.
Alternative Hypothesis: The incidence of hypoxia in interventional group, using nasal positive airway pressure system is significantly lower, than in a control group with conventional oxygen supplementation canula
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention Group
Patients undergoing endoscopic procedures receiving oxygen supplementation through nasal positive airway pressure system ( 10 litters/minute).
Nasal positive airway System by Vyaire Medical
Incidence of Hypercarbia and Hypoxia in interventional group and its monitoring using transcutaneous (SpO2) and (tCO2) Sensor
Control Group
Patients undergoing endoscopic procedures receiving conventional oxygen supplementation through nasal cannula (6 litters/minute).
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Nasal positive airway System by Vyaire Medical
Incidence of Hypercarbia and Hypoxia in interventional group and its monitoring using transcutaneous (SpO2) and (tCO2) Sensor
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ASA IV (recent (\<3 months MI, CVA, TIA, or CAD/stents, ongoing cardiac ischemia or severe valve dysfunction, severe reduction of ejection fraction, sepsis, ARD or ESRD not undergoing regularly scheduled dialysis
* Active Malignancy (ECOG Performance \>2)
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnancy
* Intubation assisted endoscopy
* Procedure without sedation
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Ulm
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Thomas Seufferlein
Prof. Dr. med. Benjamin Walter
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Universitätsklinikum Ulm
Ulm, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EndoBreath
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.