Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
22 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-06-18
2024-05-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
type of study: interventional participant population: 20-40years, both gender, healthy Participants will be exposed for 4 different sessions of 8 hours at a time, to 32˚ C or 25˚ C in combination with relative humidity of 30 %RH or 70 %RH.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Indoor Air Quality, Temperature and Cognitive Performance
NCT06380582
Effect of Time-restricted Eating on Cognitive Function and Other Biopsychosocial Factors in Menopausal Women Undertaking a 12-week Exercise Programme
NCT06138015
Suitability of a 26 °C Indoor Environment for Mitigating Heat Strain in Young Adults
NCT07267598
The Effect Of Balance Training With Dual Task On Cognitive Status And Functionality In Elderly
NCT05333172
Effects of Forest Therapy on Physical and Psychological Parameters in the General Population
NCT05338372
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Main research question and primary objective:
What is the impact of being exposed for 8 hours to a high humidity (RH 70%) versus low humidity (RH 30%) on cognitive performance of individuals if the room temperature is 25ºC or 32ºC?
This leads to the following hypotheses:
* Exposure to an indoor high relative humidity (RH 70%) at a warm temperature (32ºC) of a long duration (8 hours) reduces the composite score, speed and accuracy of cognitive performance compared to an exposure to a low RH (30%) at the same temperature (32ºC) due to the humidity.
* An exposure to an indoor high relative humidity (RH 70%) at a neutral temperature (25ºC) of a long duration (8 hours) would reduce the composite score, speed and accuracy of cognitive performance compared to an exposure to a low RH (30%) at a neutral temperature (25 ºC) due to previous literature for humidity influences at neutral temperatures.
Secondary research question and secondary objective:
What is the effect of high vs. neutral temperature (32˚ C vs. 25˚ C) in combination with high vs. low humidity (30 %RH vs. 70 %RH) on physiological responses, environmental perception, decision making, and bias behaviour?
This leads to the following hypotheses:
1. Does an 8 hour exposure to an elevated concentration of indoor humidity lead to an increase in energy expenditure and/or a greater difference in proximal and distal blood flow and skin temperature gradients compared to a lower indoor humidity for each of the temperature settings?
2. What are the effects of high humidity on substrate oxidation, blood pressure, heart rate variability, proximal and distal skin temperature, risk behavior and decision-making responses of individuals?
3. What are the effects of higher humidity on environmental perception (thermal, air quality, moisture/wetness) comfort, perception, and sensation?
* An exposure to an indoor high relative humidity (RH 70%) at a warm temperature (32ºC) of a long duration (8 hours) reduces the composite score, speed and accuracy of cognitive performance compared to an exposure to a high RH (70%) at a neutral temperature (25 ºC) due to the humidity and temperature.
* An exposure to an indoor low relative humidity (RH 30%) at a warm temperature (32ºC) of a long duration (8 hours) would reduce the composite score, speed and accuracy of cognitive performance compared to an exposure to the same low RH (30%) at a neutral temperature (25 ºC) due to the temperature.
Exploratory research question and objective:
What is the interaction effect of high vs. neutral temperature (32˚ C vs. 25˚ C) in combination with high vs. low humidity (30 %RH vs. 70 %RH) on cognitive performance, physiological responses, environmental perception, decision making, and bias behaviour?
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Temperature and Humidity
32C or 25C and 30%RH or 70%RH
Temperature and Humidity
Temperature and Humidity of room changed
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Temperature and Humidity
Temperature and Humidity of room changed
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age between 20-40 years
* Proficient with the English language in both verbal and written form
* Healthy; no illness or disease or prescribed medication within the last 3 months
* Steady dietary and sleeping habits
* Regularly physically active (i.e., regularly active but less than 3 times a week for less than 2 hours per session at moderate intensity)
* Non-smoker or person who quit smoking more than five years ago
* Reside in the Netherlands (or surrounding countries) for at least 6 months
Exclusion Criteria
* Subjects with any medical condition requiring treatment and/or medication (except oral contraceptives) that might interfere with the investigated parameters E.g., Extreme chronotype, colour blindness, epilepsy
* Subjects with a disorder or disease (Parkinson, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Alzheimer, diabetes, cardiovascular disorder, respiratory impairments (for example asthma), hypertension, obesity, or any other condition that can impair the lung function), or Raynaud's phenomenon
* Subjects with abnormal diet and sleeping patters and/or abnormal body weight (weight gain or loss \>3kg in the past month)
* Subjects who recently participated in other interventional biomedical study within 1 month prior to screening visit
* Subjects, who do not want to be informed about unexpected medical findings, or do not wish that their treating physician will be informed, cannot participate in this study
* Subjects with previous covid infection in the past 3 months or any subject with persistent long covid symptoms that may have caused ongoing loss of or altered sense of smell
* Subjects who had severely altered sleep patterns in the past year
* Subjects employed with night shift work within the past year
* Subjects who consume more than two standard drinks of alcohol per day
* Subjects who consume more than two standard drinks of coffee per day
* Subjects who are pregnant
20 Years
40 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Maastricht University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Guy Plasqui, PHD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Maastricht University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Maastricht University
Maastricht, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NL81104.068.22
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.