Regorafenib Combined With TAS-102 Versus Regorafenib Monotherapy in Third or Later Line Therapy of mCRC

NCT ID: NCT05970705

Last Updated: 2023-08-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

101 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-07-01

Study Completion Date

2026-07-04

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical benefit of regorafenib combined with TAS-102 compared with regorafenib monotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who have failed at least two lines of treatment, to explore the rationality of this combination therapy strategy and to obtain relevant survival and safety data.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Based on the current diagnostic and treatment guidelines, regorafenib and TAS-102 monotherapy are both standard third-line treatment options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), yet the overall treatment sequence or preference is not clear. A retrospective study directly compared the efficacy of regorafenib and TAS-102 monotherapy for third-line treatment of mCRC, and found similar efficacy between the two treatments. However, the benefits of current third-line monotherapy for mCRC are still limited. Patients who receive oral regorafenib monotherapy have an ORR of less than 5%, disease control rate of 50-60%, and TAS-102 has an ORR of 1.1%-1.6% and a disease control rate of less than 50% in third-line treatment of mCRC. These drugs have limited prolongation of progression-free survival (PFS), and disease progression and drug resistance often occur shortly after medication use. Most mCRC patients have a high tumor burden during third-line treatment, and how to improve the remission rate of treatment, improve patients' quality of life due to high tumor burden, increase disease control, and further bring better survival benefits is still a big challenge for third-line treatment. Regorafenib and TAS-102 have different mechanisms of action and different adverse reaction spectra. When the two drugs are used in combination, they may complement each other in terms of efficacy and are also less likely to have toxic effects.

In the RECOURSE study, 17% of patients in the TAS-102 treatment group had received prior treatment with regorafenib. Subgroup analysis showed that the efficacy of TAS-102 was not dependent on whether or not the patient had previously received regorafenib treatment. Therefore, the combination of regorafenib and TAS-102 may be a valuable treatment option for refractory mCRC. However, there is little clinical research data on whether the combination therapy could further improve efficacy and prolong patient survival compared to monotherapy. In 2021, a phase Ib small-sample study from Germany explored the combined use of regorafenib and TAS-102 in third-line treatment of mCRC. The study included 12 patients who received combined treatment with regorafenib and TAS-102 in third-line treatment. After a 3+3 dose-exploration trial, three cases of DLT were all grade 3 hypertension related to regorafenib. The combination of TAS-102 25 mg/m2 twice daily and regorafenib 120 mg was well tolerated, with a median PFS of 3.81 months (95% CI: 1.51-5.2), and a median OS of 11.1 months (95% CI: 2.3-18.2). The results of this early-phase clinical trial suggest that compared to regorafenib monotherapy in the CORRECT study with a median PFS of less than two months and a median OS of less than seven months, the third-line combination treatment of regorafenib and TAS-102 may potentially provide patients with greater clinical benefits. In conclusion, the combination therapy of regorafenib and TAS-102 may be further explored and studied for late-stage colorectal cancer in third-line or after third-line treatment.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical benefits and safety of the combination of regorafenib and TAS-102 compared to regorafenib monotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer who have failed second-line or later treatments. The efficacy and safety of the combination therapy will be fully evaluated, and explorations of efficacy, PFS, OS, safety, and related biomarkers associated with the combined treatment of regorafenib and TAS-102 will be conducted.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

controlled, randomized
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A: Regorafenib+TAS-102 combination therapy

Regorafenib 80mg ,orally, once a day, d1-28, every 28 days, TAS-102,35mg/m2, orally,twice a day, d1-5 \& d15-19,every 28 days

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Regorafenib

Intervention Type DRUG

this anti-angiogenesis targeting drug is one of the standard third-line treatment options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Trifluridine/Tipiracil

Intervention Type DRUG

this chemotherapeutic drug is also one of the standard third-line treatment options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

B:Regorafenib monotherapy

Regorafenib, 120mg orally, once a day, d1-21, every 28 days (If the patient's body surface area is less than 1.5m2, the starting dose of regorafenib is 80mg)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Regorafenib

Intervention Type DRUG

this anti-angiogenesis targeting drug is one of the standard third-line treatment options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Regorafenib

this anti-angiogenesis targeting drug is one of the standard third-line treatment options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Intervention Type DRUG

Trifluridine/Tipiracil

this chemotherapeutic drug is also one of the standard third-line treatment options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Stivaga TAS-102

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

The subjects must meet all of the following criteria to be eligible for this study:

1. Patients with histologically confirmed recurrent/metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma.
2. Patients who have failed at least one prior standard first- or second-line therapy, including fluoropyrimidine-based therapy, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and bevacizumab. Treatment failure is defined as either radiographic evidence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity during treatment or within three months following completion of therapy.

(Note: a. each line of therapy should include at least one or more chemotherapy agents administered for at least one cycle; b. adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy is allowed. If relapse or metastasis occurs during or within six months after completion of adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy, it is considered a failure of first-line chemotherapy for progressive disease. c. For patients with RAS/RAF wild-type tumors, the use of an EGFR inhibitor is not required.)
3. At least one measurable lesion, with the longest diameter ≥10 mm on spiral CT or ≥20 mm on conventional CT (RECIST 1.1 criteria).
4. ECOG performance status of 0-2.
5. Life expectancy of ≥12 weeks.
6. Adequate bone marrow, hepatic, and renal function measured within the screening period prior to randomization: absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1.5 × 109 /L, hemoglobin ≥ 8.0 g/dL, platelet count ≥ 75 × 109 /L, total bilirubin \<1.5 × ULN, ALT and AST \<2.5 × ULN (≤5 × ULN for patients with liver involvement), serum creatinine ≤1.5 × ULN, and creatinine clearance ≥50 mL/min.
7. Women of childbearing potential must use effective contraception.
8. Voluntarily participating in this study, signing the informed consent form, understanding the purpose of the study and the necessary procedures, and willing to participate in this study.

Exclusion Criteria

Patients who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from the study:

1. Proteinuria ≥2+ on dipstick or 24-hour urinary protein ≥1.0 g/24 h.
2. Abnormal coagulation function (PT\>16s, APTT\>43s, TT\>21s, Fbg\<2g/L), bleeding tendency, or receiving thrombolysis or anticoagulation therapy.
3. Patients at risk of gastrointestinal bleeding, including those with active digestive ulcers and fecal occult blood (++) and those with histories of black stools or hematemesis within three months.
4. Receiving systemic antitumor therapy, including chemotherapy, signal transduction inhibitors, or immune therapies, within three weeks prior to screening.
5. Patients with uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure \>140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure \>90 mmHg) despite antihypertensive medication, grade I or higher coronary heart disease, grade I or higher arrhythmia (including QTc interval prolongation with ≥450 ms for men and ≥470 ms for women), or grade I or higher heart failure.
6. Patients with a history of thrombotic or embolic events requiring treatment within the preceding six months.
7. Patients who have received radiation therapy targeting the selected target lesion.
8. Symptomatic brain or meningeal metastasis.
9. Uncontrolled pleural or peritoneal effusion.
10. Receiving kidney dialysis.
11. Serious or uncontrolled infection.
12. Pregnant or lactating women or women of childbearing potential without adequate contraception.
13. Multiple factors affecting oral drug administration (dysphagia, chronic diarrhea, and bowel obstruction).
14. Patients who have been treated with small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors containing VEGFR (such as apatinib, fruquintinib, anlotinib, and lenvatinib).
15. Patients who have been treated with TAS-102.
16. Participation in another clinical study within four weeks prior to screening.
17. Patients with comorbidities that could seriously endanger patients' safety or affect their completion of the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fudan University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Weijian Guo

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Chenchen Wang, M.D

Role: primary

862154561523

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FDZL-REGOT

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.