Survey Evaluating Elements in Choosing Mentors/ Mentees in Anesthesia

NCT ID: NCT05968339

Last Updated: 2024-02-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

1000 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-09-15

Study Completion Date

2024-12-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Mentorship is increasingly recognised as a core component of career advancement, medical education and psychosocial support.

Mentorship is defined as the relationship between a mentor and a mentee, where both collegially gain from an open and active relationship

Overall, there is little known about mentorship in anaesthesia.

To our knowledge, no study has yet explored the fostering of an anaesthetic mentor-mentee relationship from the point of view of the mentor and mentee themselves. Preferences with regards to implementation programs versus free choice and the importance of sociodemographic characteristics (gender, ethnicity, sexuality, disability, age) have also yet to be investigated.

The prevalence of mentor-mentee relationships/ the understanding of mentor and mentee choice in anaesthesia will be studied.

In parallel, key socio-demographics that are linked to the choice of mentor-mentee, as well as evaluate availability of mentors, and other barriers to finding mentorship will also be investigated.

Hypothesis: mentorship might be affected by demographics such as gender, age, ethnicity, working country, experience, academia and subspecialty.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Mentorship is increasingly recognised as a core component of career advancement, medical education and psychosocial support.

Mentorship is defined as the relationship between a mentor and a mentee, where both collegially gain from an open and active relationship.

A mentor can be seen as a role model, a supervisor, an advisor, and a career coach.

A mentee is counselled, trained, or advised by a mentor and can be assimilated to a protégé.

A mentee has the potential to gain multiple advantages from their mentorship such as protection, sponsorship, exposure, promotion and transmission of professional ethics.

Moreover, psychosocial support in the form of identity fostering, sense of competence and role effectiveness might protect the mentee from burdens such as burnout. As a mentee's needs often change over the course of their career, it is therefore possible to have multiple mentors at different stages.

When engaging in an mentoring relationship, free choice has been shown to be more effective than automatic assignment. Unfortunately, free choice can enhance inequities in mentorship as various groups lack representation, social connections and experience a lack of opportunities to find the right mentor. Gender inequities in finding mentorship have been reported and may affect job satisfaction and career advancement.

When establishing mentorship, it is important to foster trust. Even though free choice has been reported as essential, some mentoring programs (endorsed by societies such as ESAIC / ASA) have been successfully implemented within anaesthesia(6). Sub-societies, such as ASRA, have established well-defined mentor/mentee programs (ASRA Pain Medicine Mentor Match program) where mentor/ mentee match is based on common interests.

However, there is overall little known about mentorship in anaesthesia.

A survey of mentorship in Canadian anaesthesiology residents reported multiple barriers to successful mentorship: time constraint, personal or professional incompatibility (in mentorship programs) and lack of resident choice in mentor selection(3).

A qualitative study of perceptions of mentorship by both faculty and residents identified the following:

* Evolution of the mentor-mentee relationship during residency from a primary focus on psychosocial aspect to a need of career facilitation in the end.
* Importance of congruence/ representation of gender, culture and ethnicity.

An anaesthesia specific survey has already investigated the practices of mentorship and career development during residency in the USA from the point of view of program directors.

To our knowledge, no study has yet explored the fostering of an anaesthetic mentor-mentee relationship from the point of view of the mentor and mentee themselves. Preferences with regards to implementation programs versus free choice and the importance of sociodemographic characteristics (gender, ethnicity, sexuality, disability, age) have also yet to be investigated.

The prevalence of mentor-mentee relationships/ the understanding of mentor and mentee choice in anaesthesia will be studied.

In parallel, key socio-demographics that are linked to the choice of mentor-mentee, as well as evaluate availability of mentors, and other barriers to finding mentorship will also be investigated.

Hypothesis: mentorship might be affected by demographics such as gender, age, ethnicity, working country, experience, academia and subspecialty.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Survey

The survey will be distributed via scientific anesthesiology societies and will be open for a total of 12 consecutive months.

Participation in the survey will be voluntary and anonymous - individual consent will be implied by willingness to complete the survey.

The survey will be conducted via SurveyMonkey. SurveyMonkey allows "Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act" (HIPAA)(12) compliant surveys to be created. These follow strict rules around the protection of health information. Of note, SurveyMonkey is also GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) compliant.

Data gathered from the questionnaires will be safely stored. Access to the database will be password protected and only the authors will have access for the purpose of data analysis at the end of the survey period. Analysis using chi squared tests and logistic regressions will be performed by trained statisticians.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Anesthesiologists who are members of ESAIC/ASA
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AZ Sint-Lucas Brugge

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Université Libre de Bruxelles

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sarah Saxena

Staff

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sarah Saxena, MD; PHD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Université Libre de Bruxelles

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

AZ Sint Jan Brugge

Bruges, , Belgium

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Sarah Saxena, MD; PHD

Role: CONTACT

+3250452111

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Sarah Saxena, MD; PHD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gisselbaek M, Marsh B, Soriano L, Jackman S, Seidel L, Albert A, Matot I, Coppens S, Narouze S, Barreto Chang OL, Saxena S. Gender and Race/Ethnicity dynamics in anesthesiology mentorship: results of a European survey. BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Sep 6;24(1):311. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02692-6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39242999 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Mentor-Anesth

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Anaesthesia and mHealth
NCT03750084 UNKNOWN