Magnesium Versus Prochlorperazine Versus Metoclopramide for Migraines

NCT ID: NCT05967442

Last Updated: 2024-10-08

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

157 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-08-23

Study Completion Date

2023-04-06

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This investigation describes a proposed clinical trial that will evaluate the relative efficacy of intravenous magnesium sulfate for the treatment of migraine compared to intravenous metoclopramide (Reglan) and intravenous prochlorperazine (Compazine) in the treatment of acute headache and migraine in adult patients. The ultimate objective will be clinical application of these drugs in the emergency department for the treatment of acute headache and migraine.

The two phenothiazines (metoclopramide and prochlorperazine) have been routinely utilized in the treatment of acute headache and migraine in the emergency department setting. Per the 2017 American Headache Society guidelines, both intravenous metoclopramide and intravenous procholorperazine are recommended as "clinicians should offer" agents with level B evidence. Of note, there are no agents with level A evidence purported by this guideline for acute management of migraine. The same guideline offers "no recommendation can be made regarding the role of intravenous magnesium for adults who present to the ED with acute migraine. However intravenous magnesium may be of benefit to patients who present with migraine with aura." Multiple trials have evaluated intravenous magnesium's safety and efficacy in the management of acute migraine. These have demonstrated the tolerability of intravenous magnesium on a with breadth of patients. Most commonly the primary adverse event was flushing which self-resolved. No cases of hypotension were reported.

None of these study agents have been withdrawn from the market.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Migraine or severe headache affected one-fifth of women and one-tenth of men in 2015 and is one of the leading causes of disability in the world. Over one million visits to emergency departments (ED) in the US are due to migraines. Migraine, previously believed to be a vascular disorder, is caused by inflammation due to vasodilation in the meninges secondary to the release of vasoactive neuropeptides by stimulation of the trigeminal nerve. This inflammation can result in symptoms such as headache, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, photophobia and phonophobia.

Despite migraine being a common disorder, there has yet to be a cure. Several classes of medications have been studied for the treatment of migraine. Recently, conventional therapy has shifted to the use of antidopaminergics including prochlorperazine, metoclopramide and haloperidol, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as ibuprofen and naproxen, and triptans, sumatriptan being the most commonly utilized. 5Although intravenous opioids have historically been the most common treatment for migraines, their use has fallen out of favor due to their association with increased recurrence of headaches and ED visits, abuse potential, and most recently severe intravenous opiate shortage. Alternative treatments include ketamine, propofol, dihydroergotamine and magnesium.

Magnesium is an intracellular cation that has been associated with both the function of serotonin and regulation of vascular tone, which are both mechanisms that implicate its role in the treatment of migraine. Intravenous magnesium sulfate has been studied as a treatment for migraine compared to placebo, metoclopramide and prochlorperazine. These studies have shown that magnesium is well-tolerated with a good safety profile and may be efficacious in the treatment of migraine. Metoclopramide, prochlorperazine and magnesium have been recommended in clinical practice guidelines and have become routine standard of care for treatment of migraine in this emergency department. However, no trial has evaluated these modalities simultaneously in the same population. The purpose of our study is to compare the relative efficacy for magnesium, metoclopramide, and prochlorperazine in the treatment of headache and migraine.

Via monthly block randomization, patients will be given one of three guideline recommended study drugs. Allocation will be concealed by a pharmacist (not participating in the rest of the study) solely designated to choose which drug will be the assigned study drug for each month. The pharmacists, physicians, and nurses participating in administration of the medications will be blinded to which drug is being administered during each month. Metoclopramide, prochlorperazine and magnesium have been recommended in clinical practice guidelines and have become routine standard of care for treatment of migraine in this emergency department. All three study drugs will be stored in the investigational medication refrigerator located in the main pharmacy. A pharmacist on duty in the emergency department will obtain the medication from the refrigerator and deliver it to the bedside nurse who is actively caring for the patient after an order from the physician.

The primary outcome of this study will be mean change in pain from baseline to 30 minutes after initiation of infusion (as defined on a 11-point Numeric Rating Scale. Secondary endpoints include mean change in pain from baseline to 60 minutes and 120 minutes after initiation of infusion (as defined on a 11-point Numeric Rating Scale), time to emergency department discharge, and adverse effects due to administration of study drug (hypotension, flushing, akathisia, dystonia, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, drowsiness, other self-reported adverse effects).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Migraine Headache

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Magnesium

Magnesium Sulfate 2gm in 50ml D5W over 20 minutes

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Magnesium Sulfate

Intervention Type DRUG

Magnesium Sulfate 2gm in 50ml D5W over 20 minutes

Metoclopramide

Metoclopramide 10mg in 50ml D5W over 20 minutes

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Metoclopramide 10mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Metoclopramide 10mg in 50ml D5W over 20 minutes

Prochlorperazine

Prochlorperazine in 50ml D5W over 20 minutes

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Prochlorperazine (Compazine) Injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Prochlorperazine 10mg in 50ml D5W over 20 minutes

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Magnesium Sulfate

Magnesium Sulfate 2gm in 50ml D5W over 20 minutes

Intervention Type DRUG

Metoclopramide 10mg

Metoclopramide 10mg in 50ml D5W over 20 minutes

Intervention Type DRUG

Prochlorperazine (Compazine) Injection

Prochlorperazine 10mg in 50ml D5W over 20 minutes

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \> 18 years or older
* Able to provide informed consent
* Primary diagnosis of headache or migraine
* Between October 1, 2018 to April 1, 2020
* Presenting to Advocate Christ Medical Center emergency department and meet clinical assessment per physician

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy defined as a positive urine HCG
* Stated history of renal impairment
* Allergy or sensitivity to any study drugs
* Concomitant treatment at the time of study drug administered in the emergency department
* Patients with a history of this study participation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael Cirone, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

advocate christ medical center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Advocate Christ Medical Center

Oak Lawn, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AHC-7192-D5000322

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Zonisamide Versus Propranolol in Migraine
NCT06361446 RECRUITING PHASE3