MRLinac Boost for Gynecological Cancers if Brachytherapy is Not Feasible (MARGARITA)
NCT ID: NCT05937958
Last Updated: 2023-07-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
30 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-04-01
2027-10-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main questions this study aims to answer are:
* In how many cases could local control (i.e. total disappearance of the tumor) is be achieved with this treatment?
* Which side effects are observed in patients receiving this treatment?
Participants will be asked to fill out questionnaires (e.g. regarding side effects). Furthermore, participants are asked if their clinical data may be used for study purposes.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
MRI-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Ovarian Cancer
NCT02582931
Stereotactic Pelvic Adjuvant Radiation Therapy in Cancers of the Uterus.
NCT04458597
Stereotactic Pelvic Adjuvant Radiation TherApy in Cancers of the UteruS
NCT04866394
High Dose SBRT for Abdominal-Pelvic Lymph Nodal Lesions in Oligometastatic Patients
NCT02570399
Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy - Gyne Cancer (GY03.2)
NCT00188578
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Like in IGBT, an MRL treatment provides the possibility to perform repetitive imaging before and even during each fraction and allows for dose adaptation to anatomical changes in individual patients. This way not not only the daily position of OARs in relation to the target can be taken into account, but also possible tumor regression which often is obtained during chemoradiation. Based on the experience collected so far, the MRL treatment may be an interesting treatment option in selected cases as daily MRI and plan adaptation leads to more confined dose distribution compared to CBCT-Linac options. However, dose levels for the MRL-boost are likely to be lower than for IGBT, therefore its effectiveness is still unsure.
Aims of the study:
* To introduce MRL-boost in locally advanced cervical cancer in a multicenter setting within the frame of a prospective observational study.
* To establish a bench-mark for clinical outcome with MRL-boost in a multi-center patient population with respect to local control, survival and toxicity.
* To establish reference material with regard to MRL-based DVH parameters; if applicable delineations according to the guidelines from the GEC-ESTRO gynecology working group will be used.
* To report image-based DVH parameters for target (GTV, CTV, PTV) and for OARs
* To report recurrence patterns
* To report Quality of Life
Type of design
This study is a multicenter prospective observational study. Patient registration and dosimetric reporting will be performed in the individual centers.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with para-aortic metastatic nodes (stage IVB) to the level of L2 are also eligible but patients with further dissemination are not.
* Staging according to FIGO (2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12611) and TNM (version 9, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21663) staging.
* Patients who gave informed consent to take part in the MOMENTUM study (NCT04075305) to use their clinical data for publication and share their data with other (European) sites.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Odense University Hospital
OTHER
UMC Utrecht
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Astrid van Lier
Clinical Physicist
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Odense University Hospital
Odense, , Denmark
UMC Utrecht
Utrecht, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Tine Schytte, PhD, MD
Role: primary
Ina Schulz, PhD,MD
Role: backup
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.