Evaluation of the Perception of Quality of Care of Patients Admitted to a Medical-Surgical ICU
NCT ID: NCT05931809
Last Updated: 2023-07-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
200 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-07-01
2023-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Long-term Quality of Life Among Survivors of Sepsis in China Assessed by EQ-5D
NCT04033653
The Impact of a Bundle of Preventive Measures for Post-intensive Care Syndrome on the Outcome of Critically Ill Patients
NCT03398707
Quality of Life and Patient-centered Outcomes After ICU Admission for COVID-19
NCT04416464
Impact of Interventions on Admission SOFA Score on Clinical Outcomes of Critically Ill Patients
NCT05790915
Health Related Quality of Life After Intensive Care for Sepsis, a National Cohort Study.
NCT06368336
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) highlights three domains (Triple aim) in which health systems must develop. Among them is "Improving the patient experience". One of the 6 domains of quality of care is patient-centeredness. Several funding institutions and scientific authorities have, in recent years, encouraged patient-centered clinical research with the use of outcomes that are also patient-centered.
The perception of the quality of the service provided to the critically ill patient or even is an uncommon outcome in the literature, especially evaluated with an objective and effective tool.
The SERVQUAL tool proposed by Parasuraman et al. It aims to compare the expectations and perceptions of the patient/companion regarding the quality of care provided.
In the literature, data on patient-centered perspectives and demands are scarce.
Purpose: To identify the difference between expectation and perception of care quality during the stay in the general ICU of a tertiary hospital. Objectives: To evaluate the perception of quality of care of patients admitted to a general ICU through the SERVQUAL tool translated and culturally adapted to the portuguese idiom.
Methods: A prospective, observational cohort study involving adult patients admitted to the general ICU (53 beds) of a tertiary hospital from July 1 to September 30, 2023. The SERVQUAL tool questionnaire of expectations will be applied in the first 24 hours after admission to the ICU and the perception questionnaire applied in the first 24 hours after discharge from the unit.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Serqual tool
The SERVQUAL scale will be applied with the questionnaire of expectations in the first 24 hours after admission and perception questionnaire within the first 24 hours after discharge.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* consent form signed by the patient or a family member.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients readmitted to the ICU during the study period.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital Sao Domingos
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
José Raimundo Araujo de Azevedo
ICU Assistent Physician
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Burstin H, Leatherman S, Goldmann D. The evolution of healthcare quality measurement in the United States. J Intern Med. 2016 Feb;279(2):154-9. doi: 10.1111/joim.12471.
Sixma HJ, Kerssens JJ, Campen CV, Peters L. Quality of care from the patients' perspective: from theoretical concept to a new measuring instrument. Health Expect. 1998 Nov;1(2):82-95. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.1998.00004.x.
Jonkisz A, Karniej P, Krasowska D. The Servqual Method as an Assessment Tool of the Quality of Medical Services in Selected Asian Countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 26;19(13):7831. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137831.
Malathi A, Jasim KM. Validating the relationship between service quality, patient sensitivity and experience towards medical applications using SERVQUAL. Int J Med Inform. 2022 Dec;168:104883. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104883. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
Regaira Martinez E, Sola Iriarte M, Goni Viguria R, Del Barrio Linares M, Margall Coscojuela MA, Asiain Erro MC. [Care quality in intensive care evaluated by the patients using a service quality scale (SERVQUAL)]. Enferm Intensiva. 2010 Jan-Mar;21(1):3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.enfi.2009.10.001. Epub 2010 Feb 1. Spanish.
Lu SJ, Kao HO, Chang BL, Gong SI, Liu SM, Ku SC, Jerng JS. Identification of quality gaps in healthcare services using the SERVQUAL instrument and importance-performance analysis in medical intensive care: a prospective study at a medical center in Taiwan. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Sep 29;20(1):908. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05764-8.
Fan LH, Gao L, Liu X, Zhao SH, Mu HT, Li Z, Shi L, Wang LL, Jia XL, Ha M, Lou FG. Patients' perceptions of service quality in China: An investigation using the SERVQUAL model. PLoS One. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):e0190123. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190123. eCollection 2017.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HSD 2023 2
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.