Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
7 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-02-01
2023-06-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Researchers will compare \[conventional impression technique to digital impression\]
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy of a Scarf to Facilitate Mother-newborn Contact Designed to Facilitate Skin-to-skin Contact
NCT04881071
Effect of Implementing Evidence Based Practices on Prevention of Associated Nasal Pressure Injuries Among Preterm Neonates With Non-Invasive Respiratory Support
NCT06642285
Nasal Problems in Neonates and Infants Subjected to CPAP
NCT06557915
Ventilatory Management of the Preterm Neonate in the Delivery Room
NCT01255826
NHFOV Vs NIPPV Post-extubation in Preterm Neonates
NCT06620107
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Conventional impression
Conventional impression
Palatal impressions obtained using an irreversible hydrocolloid impression material
Digital impression
Digital impression
after obtaining stone models from conventional impression material, stone models were scanned using the I700 (Medit) scanner and Patients were directly scanned intraorally using an intraoral 3D scanner Subsequently, the printed 3D model scan data of the seven patients were then used for standard triangulated language (STL)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Conventional impression
Palatal impressions obtained using an irreversible hydrocolloid impression material
Digital impression
after obtaining stone models from conventional impression material, stone models were scanned using the I700 (Medit) scanner and Patients were directly scanned intraorally using an intraoral 3D scanner Subsequently, the printed 3D model scan data of the seven patients were then used for standard triangulated language (STL)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* neonates
Exclusion Criteria
* bilateral cleft lip and palatal
* incomplete cleft lip
1 Day
28 Days
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Alexandria University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hams Hamed Abdelrahman
Assistant lecturer of DPH and Clinical statistician
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Alexandria Faculty of Dentistry
Alexandria, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Digital_impression_neonates_23
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.