Stopping Antibiotics After 3 Days for the Treatment of High-risk FEbrile Neutropenia
NCT ID: NCT05926063
Last Updated: 2024-03-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE4
410 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-02-26
2026-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main question it aims to answer is: whether the short-term treatment is equally safe for patients, hence the name 'SAFE study'.
Participants will be randomly assigned (randomized) to one of two treatment options once they develop neutropenic fever: short-term or long-term antibiotic treatment. An additional blood sample, urine sample and stool sample will be collected.
Researchers will compare the short-term and the long-term antibiotic treatment groups to see if the short treatment is equally safe as the long-term treatment group.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy of Antibiotic Short Course for Bloodstream Infections in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients With Febrile Neutropenia
NCT04910698
Antimicrobial Revision in Persistent Febrile Neutropenia
NCT05784844
Association of Cefepime Trough Levels With Clinical Efficacy and Neurotoxicity in Patients With Febrile Neutropenia
NCT04250038
Early Antibiotic Discontinuation in FUO
NCT02906254
Probability of Optimal Target Attainment of Amikacin in Patients With Febrile Neutropenia During Treatment for a Hematological Disorder
NCT05689450
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Short treatment group
Empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics (EBAT) as per local protocol:
* Meropenem 3 x 1(/2) g IV; OR
* Piperacilline-Tazobactam 4 x 4 g IV; OR
* Cefepime 3 x 2 g IV; OR
* Ceftazidim 3 x 2 g IV
Short treatment group: EBAT will be discontinued:
* After 3x24 hours;
* Irrespective of presence of fever; AND
* If no clinical of microbiological infection is documented.
Comparison short vs extended EBAT treatment group
This study compares two management strategies of patients undergoing treatment with chemotherapy or a stem cell transplantation. One strategy is to treat these patients at the time of febrile neutropenia with a fixed 72 hours course of EBAT. The other, more commonly followed strategy is a longer minimum EBAT duration of 5 days as well as other variables like neutrophil recovery and defervescence. In both arms, definitive treatment is given when an infectious cause of the fever is found according to local guidelines (e.g. pneumonia or mucosits with bacteremia).
Extended treatment group
Empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics (EBAT) as per local protocol:
* Meropenem 3 x 1(/2) g IV; OR
* Piperacilline-Tazobactam 4 x 4 g IV; OR
* Cefepime 3 x 2 g IV; OR
* Ceftazidim 3 x 2 g IV
Extended treatment arm: EBAT will be continued:
* At least 5x24 hours;
* Until afebrile (TMT\<38.0°C) for at least 5 consecutive days; OR
* Until resolution of neutropenia (ANC \>0,5 x109/L); OR
* Until they have been treated 10 days, whatever comes first.
Comparison short vs extended EBAT treatment group
This study compares two management strategies of patients undergoing treatment with chemotherapy or a stem cell transplantation. One strategy is to treat these patients at the time of febrile neutropenia with a fixed 72 hours course of EBAT. The other, more commonly followed strategy is a longer minimum EBAT duration of 5 days as well as other variables like neutrophil recovery and defervescence. In both arms, definitive treatment is given when an infectious cause of the fever is found according to local guidelines (e.g. pneumonia or mucosits with bacteremia).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Comparison short vs extended EBAT treatment group
This study compares two management strategies of patients undergoing treatment with chemotherapy or a stem cell transplantation. One strategy is to treat these patients at the time of febrile neutropenia with a fixed 72 hours course of EBAT. The other, more commonly followed strategy is a longer minimum EBAT duration of 5 days as well as other variables like neutrophil recovery and defervescence. In both arms, definitive treatment is given when an infectious cause of the fever is found according to local guidelines (e.g. pneumonia or mucosits with bacteremia).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age older than 16 years;
* Intensive therapy is started within three days before randomization for one of the following haematological conditions:
* Remission induction chemotherapy for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS); OR
* Re-induction chemotherapy for relapsed after haematological remission lasting for a minimum duration of 6 months; OR
* Conditioning regimen to prepare for an allogeneic HCT; OR
* Conditioning regimen to prepare for an autologous HCT.
* Expected longstanding (≥ 7 days) neutropenia (ANC \< 0.5x10\^9/L);
* Expected length of hospital stay of at least 10 days.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patient already receives broad spectrum antibiotic therapy;
3. Any critical illness for which Intensive Care Unit treatment is required;
4. SOFA score ≥ 11;
5. Longstanding neutropenia (\>21 days) prior inclusion;
6. Previous enrolment in this study;
7. Not able to provide written informed consent;
8. Any disorder, which in the Investigator's opinion might jeopardise the participant's safety or compliance with the protocol;
9. Any prior or concomitant treatment(s) that might jeopardise the participant's safety or that would compromise the integrity of the Trial.
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Ghent
OTHER
Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
OTHER
University Hospital, Antwerp
OTHER
AZ Sint-Jan AV
OTHER
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liege
OTHER
Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain
OTHER
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Johan Maertens, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospitals Leuven
Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2022-500389-84
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
S66527
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.