Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback Following Traumatic Brain Injury

NCT ID: NCT05913505

Last Updated: 2023-06-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

EARLY_PHASE1

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-02-15

Study Completion Date

2024-04-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Individuals with mild traumatic brain injury will be randomly assigned to an active heart rate variability biofeedback condition and a sham condition. The investigators will use a randomized pre-post design that will consist of two data collection phases and a 5-week treatment condition. The heart rate variability biofeedback active condition is designed to increase heart rate oscillations (Osc+ condition) consistent with current best practices, while the sham control heart rate variability biofeedback condition is designed to decrease heart rate oscillations (Osc- condition).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

There are two primary aims of the study: (1) examine whether heart rate variability increases at rest in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury from pre-treatment to post-treatment following heart rate variability biofeedback; (2) to test whether heart rate variability recovery following a stressor improves in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury following heart rate variability biofeedback. Regarding the first primary aim, the investigators hypothesize that heart rate variability will be higher in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury following heart rate variability biofeedback compared to those in the control/sham condition where the investigators do not expect such improvement pre- to post-testing. For the second aim, consistent with previous work, the investigators hypothesize that heart rate variability recovery following a stressor will be faster in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury following heart rate variability biofeedback compared to a sham control condition. There are three secondary aims for this study: (1) to evaluate whether improvements in heart rate variability in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury following heart rate variability biofeedback are associated with improvements in physical symptoms common after head injury (i.e., headaches, dizziness, sleep disturbance); (2) to evaluate whether improvements in heart rate variability in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury following heart rate variability biofeedback are associated with improvements in emotional functioning (i.e., life satisfaction, anxiety symptoms, depression symptoms); and (3) to evaluate whether improvements in heart rate variability in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury following heart rate variability biofeedback are associated with improvements in cognitive functioning (i.e., attention, inhibitory control).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Traumatic Brain Injury

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Twenty-five participants will complete the treatment condition in a pseudo-randomized order (determined by random number generator with constraints) such that half of the participants will be given the heart rate variability biofeedback active condition and half will be given the sham control condition. However, the participants in the sham control condition will be offered treatment with heart rate variability biofeedback after study completion. The heart rate variability biofeedback active condition is designed to increase heart rate oscillations (Osc+ condition) consistent with current best practices, while the sham control heart rate variability biofeedback condition is designed to decrease heart rate oscillations (Osc- condition).
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
Baseline measurements will be collected by undergraduate research assistants blinded to group conditions to reduce possible experimenter bias effects. Additionally, research assistants will be blinded to conditions for all testing sessions.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

OSC+

Twenty-five participants will complete five weeks of heart rate variability biofeedback using emWave software (HeartMath®Institute, 2020). Participants will receive a weekly 30-minute heart rate variability biofeedback session for five weeks at the University Parkway Center, Brigham Young University. The heart rate variability biofeedback protocol will be based on Lehrer et al., 2013 and Yoo et al., 2022. This format will aid participants in implementing and learning breathing and heart rate variability biofeedback skills (Lehrer et al., 2020). All participants will wear an ear sensor to measure their pulse. The heart rate variability biofeedback will focus on autonomic balance through slow breathing at a resonance frequency of approximately 6 breathes per minute. The best approximate breathing pace for resonance frequency will be estimated and participant's resonance frequency will be provided and used for their homework and subsequent training sessions.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

OSC+

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The first session of the HRVB intervention will focus on introducing the client to HRVB and calculating the participant's resonance frequency which typically range from 4.5-7 breaths per minute. Participants will first complete a five-minute baseline breathing condition. Following the breathing condition, the participants will complete five conditions for five minutes each. Specifically, each condition will have the person breath at 6, 6.5, 5.5, 5, and 4.5 breaths per minute with a minute break between. Session two will focus on practicing resonance frequency breathing and solidifying the correct resonance frequency for the participant. Additionally, this session will introduce the technique of breathing through pursed lips and abdominal breathing. For sessions three through five, participants will practice resonance frequency breathing and review previous strategies.

OSC-

Twenty-five participants will complete five weeks of Osc-. Similarly, for the Osc- procedures, the client will be required to complete a five-week intervention. During the weekly session, participants will also be wearing an earlobe monitor with HeartMath. Participants will be administered the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience at the beginning of each session to assess for mood. Participants will also be administered the 3-item Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire at the beginning of each session. Participants will be instructed that the purpose of this portion of the study is to decrease their breathing oscillations. A program was designed by Yoo and colleagues (2022) that gives feedback regarding a "calmness" score which reflects a better score (i.e., higher) when participants breath in a pattern that elicits less variability (i.e., less oscillations).

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

OSC-

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

During the first week, the baseline will be assessed and resonance frequency. Specifically, during their first intervention session the participants will be told that the goal of the sessions includes decreasing heart rate variability and avoiding slow and steady breathing. The participants will then be asked to choose five strategies to lower their heart rate oscillations. Participants will be told to avoid slow breathing as it causes large heart rate oscillations. For the second session, the therapist will check in with the participant and discuss how the practice went. Participants will then select three strategies that they will practice for three five-minute conditions following a five-minute baseline. Sessions three, four, and five will include three conditions: a five-minute baseline and two strategies of their choice. For each session, the best strategy will be calculated and written on the assignment sheets to be used during the week for their four homework sessions.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

OSC+

The first session of the HRVB intervention will focus on introducing the client to HRVB and calculating the participant's resonance frequency which typically range from 4.5-7 breaths per minute. Participants will first complete a five-minute baseline breathing condition. Following the breathing condition, the participants will complete five conditions for five minutes each. Specifically, each condition will have the person breath at 6, 6.5, 5.5, 5, and 4.5 breaths per minute with a minute break between. Session two will focus on practicing resonance frequency breathing and solidifying the correct resonance frequency for the participant. Additionally, this session will introduce the technique of breathing through pursed lips and abdominal breathing. For sessions three through five, participants will practice resonance frequency breathing and review previous strategies.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

OSC-

During the first week, the baseline will be assessed and resonance frequency. Specifically, during their first intervention session the participants will be told that the goal of the sessions includes decreasing heart rate variability and avoiding slow and steady breathing. The participants will then be asked to choose five strategies to lower their heart rate oscillations. Participants will be told to avoid slow breathing as it causes large heart rate oscillations. For the second session, the therapist will check in with the participant and discuss how the practice went. Participants will then select three strategies that they will practice for three five-minute conditions following a five-minute baseline. Sessions three, four, and five will include three conditions: a five-minute baseline and two strategies of their choice. For each session, the best strategy will be calculated and written on the assignment sheets to be used during the week for their four homework sessions.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* At least six months post-injury to account for spontaneous recovery
* Aged 18-55 years
* Fluent in English
* Able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Presence of a pacemaker
* Previous self-reported heart attack with hospitalization
* Diagnosed learning disability
* Other neurological difficulties or diagnoses (i.e., stroke, epilepsy)
* Participation in current litigation
* Uncorrected visual impairment.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Brigham Young University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Leah Talbert

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael J Larson, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Brigham Young University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Brigham Young University

Provo, Utah, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Leah D Talbert, MS

Role: CONTACT

3343141078

Michael J Larson, PhD

Role: CONTACT

8014226125

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Michael J Larson, PhD

Role: primary

801-422-6125

Leah D Talbert, MS

Role: backup

3343141078

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TBI_HRVB

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Remotely Deployed TBI Study
NCT01882244 UNKNOWN NA