Rehabilitation of Traumatic Brain Injury in Active Duty Military Personnel and Veterans
NCT ID: NCT00540020
Last Updated: 2007-10-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
360 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
1996-07-31
2003-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Objective: To determine the relative efficacy of two different acute TBI rehabilitation approaches - cognitive-didactic versus functional-experiential. Secondarily to determine relative efficacy for different patient subpopulations based on baseline cognitive functioning.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
All patients admitted to the Commission for Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF) accredited acute inpatient rehabilitation brain injury programs at 4 participating Veterans Administration Medical Centers (VAMCs) (Minneapolis, Palo Alto, Richmond, and Tampa) during the study enrollment period were screened for eligibility.
The design was a randomized-controlled trial with two treatment arms (cognitive-didactic and functional-experiential), both embedded within an interdisciplinary TBI rehabilitation program. All treatment was hospital based. The interactive nature of the experimental conditions precluded subject blinding. Since each participating site serves a wide geographic area, the protocol permitted post-hospital outcome assessments by structured telephonic interview, to minimize drop out.
Participants completed baseline assessment then received by random assignment one of the two standardized protocol rehabilitation programs (summarized below and described in detail elsewhere). Participants received 1.5 to 2.5 hours daily of protocol-specific therapy plus another 2 to 2.5 hours daily of occupational and physical therapy. Independent teams of therapists functioned at each site to deliver the separate treatments and by necessity were not blinded to treatment. Protocol monitoring site visits, biweekly conference calls, and biannual investigator meetings were conducted to ensure uniformity of protocol treatment over time.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cognitive-Didactic
Developed by Sohlberg \& Mateer to target four cognitive domains often impaired by TBI: attention, memory, executive functions, and pragmatic communication. Subjects practiced progressively more difficult paper-and-pencil or computerized cognitive tasks in 1:1 cognitive therapy sessions (1.5-2.5 hours daily).
Rehabilitation
Functional-Experiential
The works of Giles and Clark-Wilson and Hartley guided the basic concepts and treatment of the functional-experiential arm (Functional). The objective of the functional protocol was to use real life performance situations and common tasks to remediate or compensate for functional deficits after brain injury. Functional protocol treatment interventions (1.5-2.5 hours daily) typically occurred in group settings and natural environments (hospital recreation areas, group rooms, simulated home environments in the dining room, community outings, etc.).
Rehabilitation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Rehabilitation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* documented traumatic brain injury within 6 months of randomization
* Rancho Los Amigos Scale (RLAS) cognitive level of 5-7 at time of randomization
* age 18 or older
* active duty military member or veteran
* anticipated length of needed acute interdisciplinary TBI rehabilitation of 30 days or more
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
James A. Haley Veterans Administration Hospital
FED
Hunter Holmes Mcguire Veteran Affairs Medical Center
FED
Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center
FED
VA Palo Alto Health Care System
FED
US Department of Veterans Affairs
FED
The Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center
FED
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Deborah L. Warden, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center
Elaine Date, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
VA Palo Alto Health Care System
Steven Scott, D.O.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
James A. Haley VA
Barbara Sigford, M.D., Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Minneapolis VA
William Walker, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hunter H. McGuire VAMC
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Vanderploeg RD, Schwab K, Walker WC, Fraser JA, Sigford BJ, Date ES, Scott SG, Curtiss G, Salazar AM, Warden DL; Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center Study Group. Rehabilitation of traumatic brain injury in active duty military personnel and veterans: Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center randomized controlled trial of two rehabilitation approaches. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Dec;89(12):2227-38. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.06.015.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
F292BL-C8
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
F292BL-C7
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
F292BL-C6
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
F292BL-C9
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id