Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
35 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-02-01
2024-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Functional and Sexual Outcomes After Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for Complex Rectocele
NCT05894226
Sacrocolpopexy With Posterior Repair Obstructed Defecation Symptoms
NCT03658395
The Efficacy of Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women With or Without Avulsion of the Levator Ani Muscle
NCT03049020
Cohort Study of Bowel Function Following Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT01618292
Surgical Treatment for ODS With Rectal Prolapse Surgical Treatment for Rectal Prolapse
NCT03487640
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The surgical treatment aims at the anatomic reconstruction of the bowel and pelvic floor and has been characterized by individual approaches.
This pilot study established and standardized an interdisciplinary surgical approach of laparoscopic resection rectopexy (L-RRP) combined with a laparoscopic mesh sacrocolpopexy (L-SCP) used synonymously for all surgical reconstructions. Additionally, an absorbable biological mesh (BM) for L-SCP was offered for women who wished to preserve the uterus in cases of a planned pregnancy and those, who asked for an alternative to the synthetic mesh (SM).
* Endpoints of the study The primary study outcome parameters were the safety and efficacy of the combined laparoscopic procedure.as measured by postoperative morbidity and mortality and measured. The secondary outcome parameters were clinical and anatomical outcomes as measured by scores.
* Data management and statistical analysis The necessary clinical data were collected preoperatively, during the hospital stay, and during the follow-up examinations. All scores were documented on paper and transferred to a data bank. Data were analyzed. Quantitative variables are described as means (± standard deviation) and were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis H test and Mann-Whitney U test. Qualitative variables are summarized using count, percentage, median, and interquartile range and were compared using the Fisher's exact test. A two-sided p value of \<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Because no adjustments for multiple testing were performed, the analysis were exploratory.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Women with ODS and POP
This pilot study established and standardized an interdisciplinary surgical approach of laparoscopic resection rectopexy (L-RRP) combined with a laparoscopic mesh sacrocolpopexy (L-SCP) used synonymously for sacrohysteropey and sacrocervicopexy, as well. Additionally, an absorbable biological mesh (
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* can undergo general anesthesia
* is eligible for laparoscopic surgery
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Evangelisches Klinikum Köln Weyertal gGmbH
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Claudia Rudroff
Chief of the Department of General and visceral Surgery
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Claudia Rudroff
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
EVK Köln Weyertal
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
EVK Koeln Weyertal
Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rudroff C, Madukkakuzhy J, Hernandez AV, Otten J, Ulrici C, Karapanos L, Ludwig S. Early safety and efficiency outcomes of a novel interdisciplinary laparoscopic resection rectopexy combined with sacrocolpopexy for women with obstructive defecation syndrome and pelvic organ prolapse: a single center study. BMC Surg. 2024 Jun 14;24(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02474-4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RRP_SCP_interdisciplinary
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
EVK KOELN
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.