Researching the Useful of Barb Suture in Obese Patients Undergoing Posterior Cervical Surgery

NCT ID: NCT05895968

Last Updated: 2025-04-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-01-01

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Through a single-center, exploratory clinical study, the safety and effectiveness of using barb wire in the incision and suture of posterior cervical surgery in obese patients were evaluated, providing a basis for its wide clinical application in posterior cervical surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cervical Spinal Stenosis Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery Barbed Suture

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Preoperative

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

postoperative (2 weeks)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

posterior cervical surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The patients were operated by the posterior cervical surgery, which were used with the barbed to suture the deep fascia.

postoperative (4 weeks)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

posterior cervical surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The patients were operated by the posterior cervical surgery, which were used with the barbed to suture the deep fascia.

postoperative (3 months)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

posterior cervical surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The patients were operated by the posterior cervical surgery, which were used with the barbed to suture the deep fascia.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

posterior cervical surgery

The patients were operated by the posterior cervical surgery, which were used with the barbed to suture the deep fascia.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Symptoms and signs of the patients were typical. MRI showed single or multiple central herniation of C3-C7 intervertebral discs or spinal stenosis at corresponding levels, which confirmed cervical myeloid cervical spondylosis or cervical spinal stenosis.
* Preoperative routine tests and examinations showed no contraindications.
* BMI≥28
* Informed consent was obtained from the patient and his family, informed consent was signed, and a complete follow-up was completed after surgery.

Exclusion Criteria

* A history of wasting diseases associated with malignancy and chemoradiotherapy that may interfere with wound healing
* History of dermatosis
* History of immune system diseases
* History of blood diseases
* Skin injury or defect at the back of the neck
* Severe hypersensitivity
* Cold, fever, trauma or other infections in the week before surgery
* Infectious disease
* Psychosis could not cooperate with follow-up
Minimum Eligible Age

28 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Xijing Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Jia Yanyan

Xi'an, Shannxi Province, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Yanyan Jia

Role: CONTACT

15902984776

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Yanyan Jia

Role: primary

15902984776

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Chan VWK, Chan PK, Chiu KY, Yan CH, Ng FY. Does Barbed Suture Lower Cost and Improve Outcome in Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2017 May;32(5):1474-1477. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.015. Epub 2016 Dec 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28089469 (View on PubMed)

Lee SW, Kawai M, Tashiro K, Nomura E, Tokuhara T, Kawashima S, Tanaka R, Uchiyama K. Laparoscopic gastrointestinal anastomoses using knotless barbed absorbable sutures are safe and reproducible: a single-center experience with 242 patients. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr;46(4):329-35. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyv212. Epub 2016 Jan 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26819279 (View on PubMed)

Greenberg JA, Einarsson JI. The use of bidirectional barbed suture in laparoscopic myomectomy and total laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 Sep-Oct;15(5):621-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.06.004. Epub 2008 Jul 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18619922 (View on PubMed)

Sarsam OM, Dunning J, Pochulu B, Baste JM. Robot-assisted bronchoplasty using continuous barbed sutures. J Vis Surg. 2018 Jan 4;4:3. doi: 10.21037/jovs.2017.12.14. eCollection 2018.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29445589 (View on PubMed)

Yang S, Qi-Heng T, Yi-Xin Z. Comparison of Standard Suture vs Barbed Suture for Closing the Porcine Knee Joint: Evaluation of Biomechanical Integrity and Permeability. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Mar;33(3):903-907. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Oct 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29103781 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KY20232136-F-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.