Use of the Harmonic Scalpel in Neck Dissection

NCT ID: NCT00875953

Last Updated: 2010-12-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

34 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-01-31

Study Completion Date

2010-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Neck dissection is the main technique used by head and neck surgeons to treat known or suspected metastatic cancer to the neck. The traditional radical neck dissection was effective at treating metastatic cancer to the neck however the downside to this technique was significant morbidity. Since the early 1960's there has been several proposed techniques to treat metastatic head and neck cancer that involves preserving important anatomical structures in the neck. The disadvantage to these techniques are that they require meticulous dissection and can lead to bleeding and an increase in operative time. One particular tool that has been proposed in other surgical subspecialties, including head and neck surgery, is the harmonic scalpel. Using this tool, tissue dissection and vessel occlusion at the same time can occur with a reduced thermal damage to the surrounding tissue when compared to traditional cautery. In this study, our purpose is to determine if the harmonic scalpel will lead to a decrease in blood loss and operative time in patients undergoing a modified radical neck dissection compared to electrocautery.

Hypothesis: Use of the harmonic scalpel as a surgical adjunct will reduce operative time for neck dissection and will reduce intraoperative blood loss.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients who are referred to either the clinic of Dr. Joseph Dort or Dr. Wayne Matthews and are deemed to benefit from a modified radical neck dissection alone or as part of treatment for head and neck cancer will be given an opportunity to be a subject in this study. Once informed consent for both the surgery and the study is obtained, the lead author will be contacted and randomization will occur using a computer generated block-randomization allocation. The neck dissection will be carried out in the operating room using either electrocautery (control group) or harmonic scalpel (experimental group). The primary outcomes, blood loss (mLs) and operative time (minutes) will be assessed at the time of surgery. The blood loss in milliliters will be calculated using suction canister output, weight of sponges and irrigation used. The operative time in minutes will be calculated between the beginning of the actual neck dissection to the completion of the neck dissection defined as the removal of the surgical specimen and hemostasis of the surgical field. Intraoperative complications, namely vascular, nerve damage and lymphatic damage will be assessed at the time of surgery. Post-operative complications, both early and late will be assessed after the surgery using the Clavien post-operative complication scale. In addition, the length of time that operative drains are left in the neck will be measured with all drains being removed when their 24 hour drain output is less than 20 mls. Patients will then be followed up 2 weeks after their hospital discharge in the surgeon's clinic or the Tom Baker Cancer Centre.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neck Dissection

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

squamous cell carcinoma head and neck cancer neck dissection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard dissection

standard neck dissection technique: scalpel and cautery.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

standard neck dissection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

standard surgical technique

Harmonic Scalpel

Harmonic scalpel used in neck dissection.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Harmonic Scalpel Dissection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

harmonic scalpel used for neck dissection after flaps are raised.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

standard neck dissection

standard surgical technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Harmonic Scalpel Dissection

harmonic scalpel used for neck dissection after flaps are raised.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ethicon harmonic scalpel used

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age \> 18 years
* undergoing neck dissection (levels I-IV)

Exclusion Criteria

* no prior head and neck surgery
* no prior head and neck cancer
* no prior head and neck radiation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Calgary

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

University of Calgary

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Joseph C Dort, BSc, MSc, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Calgary - Faculty of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Foothills Medical Centre

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UCENT003

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id